  |
はてなキーワード: JOURNEYとは
We're actually gonna keep this interview going for about five days. FaceTime, Fred, and one more interview with one more Rolling Stone writer in a car, and, yeah, that's right. That's nice of thing I've ever heard. Thank you. Oh, you're welcome. Yeah. Um, let's start from the very, very beginning. Now, do you remember when David Foster Wallace's name first registered with you, like when you knew who he was?
⸻
司会：
どこかへ車で出かけて、また『Rolling Stone』のライターにも来てもらってね。
ええ、そうですね（笑）。
司会：
今まで聞いた中で一番いいアイデアかもしれない。
司会：
デヴィッド・フォスター・ウォレスという名前を初めて意識したときのことを覚えていますか？
つまり、「この人が誰なのか」を初めて知ったのはいつだったか、覚えていますか？
⸻
Now, do you remember when David Foster Wallace’s name first registered with you, like when you knew who he was?
直訳すると、
「デヴィッド・フォスター・ウォレスという名前が、あなたの中で初めて『認識された』のはいつだったか覚えていますか？ つまり、この人が誰なのかを知った最初の時のことです。」
But anyway, he was a guy who was just so forward seeing about what technology was going to become, and these things that were meant to connect us were ultimately going to dehumanize interaction. But that section in particular was about how everyone's so excited when video chat became available, but then there was realization that they can no longer do other things while they're talking to somebody.
⸻
でもとにかく、彼（デヴィッド・フォスター・ウォレス）は、テクノロジーが将来どのようなものになっていくのかを非常に先見の明をもって見抜いていた人でした。
そして、人と人とをつなぐために作られたはずのものが、最終的には人間同士のやり取りを非人間的なものにしてしまう、ということも見抜いていたんです。
特にその箇所では、ビデオチャットが利用できるようになったとき、人々はみんな大喜びしていたことについて書かれています。
でもその後になって、ビデオチャットをしながらでは、相手に見られているから、もう会話の最中に別のことはできないという現実に気づくんです。
⸻
these things that were meant to connect us
「私たちをつなぐために作られたもの（テクノロジー・通信手段）」
were ultimately going to dehumanize interaction
ここでの dehumanize は「非人間化する」という直訳よりも、「人間らしい温かみや自然さを奪う」という意味です。
they can no longer do other things while they’re talking to somebody
電話なら、本を読んだり歩いたり洗い物をしたりしながら話せますが、ビデオチャットでは画面に映っているため、そうした「ながら」がしづらくなる、というウォレスらしい観察を指しています。
connect us, we're ultimately going to dehumanize interaction. But that section in particular was about how everyone's so excited when video chat becomes available, but then they have this realization that they can no longer do other things while they're talking to somebody because they can see them. And it evolves to people creating elaborate masks and dioramas so it looks like they're giving full attention until eventually they've taped off the camera and they're back to the auditory phone conversation. So the first thing that I read, and I supposedly something will never do again, which is called shiva, at one point. A lot of the short form fiction I had and tried to tackle. No, it's a mountain rest. It's something that definitely requires time and effort to tackle. Well worth it, I think, but. Oh, I think that by the end it is the most satisfying experience you can have, and I think that there's something that he tries to remind us that we're capable. You know, you're sort of given this very subtle and sometimes not so subtle message that what you're good at is watching TV. No, really, like that what is a good life culturally is to work really hard so that you can come home and crack open a beer and watch reality TV on a big giant television, and that that should satisfy you. And it's no wonder that we feel dissatisfied, I guess. And so my experience with reading Infinite Jest was by the time I finished it, I really felt like, I feel like how you feel after you go for like a long jog. I don't really know what that's like, but. But then told, you feel like, oh, I did that. So, prior to going on this long jog, you're sitting at home with a script.
音声認識にかなり誤りがありますが、文脈を補って省略せずに訳します。
⸻
（彼は、）人と人とをつなぐために作られたものが、最終的には人間同士のやり取りを非人間的なものにしてしまう、と考えていました。
特にその箇所では、ビデオチャットが利用できるようになったとき、人々はみんな大喜びします。でもやがて、「相手に自分が見えている以上、会話をしながら別のことはできない」ということに気づくんです。
すると、人々はまるでちゃんと相手に注意を向けているように見せるため、手の込んだ仮面や背景セット（ジオラマ）まで作るようになります。
そして最終的には、カメラをテープでふさいでしまい、結局は昔ながらの「声だけの電話」で話すようになる、という話なんです。
その後、『Infinite Jest（インフィニット・ジェスト）』を読みましたが、二度とあんなことはしないだろうと思いました（笑）。
⸻
司会：
短編小説はかなり読んだんですか？
⸻
ええ、短編もたくさん読みました。そして『インフィニット・ジェスト』にも挑戦しました。
⸻
司会：
あれはまさに登るべき山ですよね。
⸻
本当にそうです。
⸻
司会：
読み終えたときには、それ以上ないくらい満足感がありますよね。
⸻
ええ。本当にそう思います。
彼が私たちに思い出させようとしていることの一つは、人間には本来もっと大きなことができる力があるということなんです。
世の中では、「あなたが得意なのはテレビを見ることなんだ」というような、とてもさりげない、ときには露骨なメッセージを絶えず浴びせられています。
本当にそうなんです。
つまり、「文化的に見て良い人生とは、一生懸命働いて、家に帰ったらビールを一本開け、大きなテレビでリアリティ番組を見て満足することなんだ」という価値観を押し付けられている。
そして、それだけで満たされるはずだと言われている。
でも、そんなことで私たちが満たされないと感じるのは、ある意味当然なんですよ。
だから僕は、『インフィニット・ジェスト』を読み終えたとき、本当に達成感がありました。
長距離ジョギングを終えたあとのような気分、と言えばいいでしょうか。
……まあ、実は長距離ジョギングなんてしたことないんですけど（笑）。
でも、とにかく「ああ、自分はやり遂げた」という感覚になるんです。
⸻
司会：
では、その長い「ジョギング」に出発する前──つまり、この役に挑む前のことですが。
I was at an airport. I was in an airport flying to Boston, and I remember it really distinctly. So, to set up where I was when I got the script, because I think it's an important part of the story. I was feeling, I was at a point where it was the last season of my TV show, and I was also, I was 34 years old. Maybe I was 33 when I got the script. And Forgetting Sarah Marshall is really an honest reflection of where I was at 24. You know, that is, I mean, that is really like, I'm really proud of it. That is what I was thinking about, and it is those times when a breakup with the girl you think you're gonna marry is devastating. The world is ending, you know what I mean? You call it the breakup, because the only one cares. Like, and a fire makes it a whole different thing. Yeah, yeah, you know, because that's what it is in your mind. It's like, the breakup. But what I had found was, I think by nature of the way the business works, by nature of doing big movies, you, you're encouraged in a lot of different ways to continue to do what has been successful. So I did a lot of movies that were sort of in that realm, or sort of felt that way. And by the time I was 33, I was starting to feel like my interior life wasn't matching up with what I was putting on screen. I was feeling a real pull. And that's not a good feeling when you write your own material, and when you, you know, I try to, a lot of different types of acting, but I kind of try to, to a submersion, being a surrogate, like, I am you for the next hour and a half. Do you feel this way too? So I put out into the ether, like, a decision. I wanted to do something different. I needed to make a change. If I'm gonna do this for 50 more years, if I'm lucky, it needs to be stuff that is reflective of how I'm, I'm in the airport, and this script arrives, and I read it on the plane. And I thought, this is really cool you sent this to me.
音声認識の誤りを補いながら、省略せず自然な日本語に訳します。
⸻
空港にいたんです。
ボストンへ向かう飛行機に乗るため空港にいて、その時のことは今でも本当にはっきり覚えています。
この脚本を受け取ったとき、自分がどんな状況にいたのかを説明しておきたいんです。そこはこの話では重要だと思うので。
当時、僕は出演していたテレビシリーズの最後のシーズンを撮っていました。
それに、34歳でした。いや、脚本を受け取った時は33歳だったかもしれません。
『Forgetting Sarah Marshall（寝取られ男のラブ♂バカンス）』という作品は、24歳だった頃の僕を、本当に正直に映し出した作品なんです。
当時の僕が実際に考えていたこと、そのままなんです。
24歳くらいの頃って、「この人と結婚するんだ」と思っていた恋人との別れは、本当に壊滅的な出来事ですよね。
⸻
司会：
だから「あの別れ（the breakup）」って呼ぶんですね。
⸻
そう（笑）。
そうなんです。
自分の頭の中では、まさに**「あの別れ」**なんですよ。
⸻
この業界の仕組み上でもあるし、大作映画に出るようになると特にそうなんですが、成功したものを繰り返し続けるよう、いろいろな形で促されるんです。
でも33歳になる頃には、自分の内面と、スクリーンの上で演じている人物が噛み合わなくなっていると感じ始めていました。
心の中では、何か別の方向へ進みたいという強い気持ちが湧いていたんです。
自分で脚本も書く人間にとって、それは決して健全な状態ではありません。
僕はいろいろなタイプの演技をしますが、基本的には役に完全に没入するタイプなんです。
つまり、
「これから90分間は、僕があなたになります。あなたも同じように感じますか？」
そういう感覚で演じたいんです。
だから僕は、まるで宇宙に向かって願いを放つみたいに、自分の中で一つ決意しました。
何か違うことをやりたい。
変わらなければいけない。
もし幸運にも、この仕事をあと50年続けられるなら、演じる作品も、その時々の自分自身を映し出しているものでなければならない。
そんなことを考えていたんです。
飛行機の中で読んで、
「これを僕に送ってくれたなんて、本当にすごいな」
と思ったんです。
And I landed and I called my agent. I said, yes, this is the type of material that I'd like to do. But, you know, maybe if someday they'll let me do this kind of stuff. And she said, no, James Ponsoldt, the director, wants to talk to you about it because he thinks that you might be able to do it. And there was a line in that script that I almost like cried on the airplane, which was uncomfortable because there was a little person next to me who was a stranger. You've been full frontal naked on screen, but you were uncomfortable crying on a plane? Oh, I had a bad experience, and that's a short tangent that probably, but one time, I think it was due to the altitude, I was watching a movie on the plane, and I started crying like really hard. I think a good way of putting it is disproportionate to the occasion. And the woman next to me looked over at me like, is he okay? And then she like peeked over to look at what I was watching. It was Dreamgirls.
音声認識の崩れを補正しながら、省略せず自然な日本語に訳します。
⸻
「うん、こういう作品こそ、僕がやりたい仕事なんだ。でも、いつかこういう役をやらせてもらえたらいいな、って感じかな」
そう言ったんです。
すると彼女は、
「違うのよ。監督のジェームズ・ポンソルトが、あなたとこの作品について話したいと言ってるの。あなたなら演じられると思っているから」
と言いました。
脚本には、飛行機の中で読んでいて、思わず泣きそうになったセリフが一つあったんです。
隣にまったく知らない小柄な人が座っていたので、それはちょっと気まずかったですね。
⸻
司会：
スクリーンでは全裸になることも平気なのに、飛行機で泣くほうが恥ずかしかったんですか？
⸻
ええ（笑）。
少し話がそれますけど。
たぶん高度のせいだったと思うんですが、機内で映画を観ていたら、本当に号泣し始めちゃって。
その状況に対して、泣き方が完全に度を超えていたんですよ。
⸻
司会：
⸻
隣に座っていた女性が僕を見て、
「この人、大丈夫なの？」
みたいな顔をしていました。
それから彼女は、僕が何を観ているのか気になったんでしょうね。
身を乗り出して画面をのぞき込んだんです。
そしたら……
⸻
補足
I think a good way of putting it is disproportionate to the occasion.
これは直訳すると、
という意味です。
つまり、「少し感動して涙ぐむ」程度ではなく、周囲が心配するくらい激しく泣いてしまった、というジョークになっています。
また、
You’ve been full frontal naked on screen
という映画
アニオリの『けいおん！』に限らず、『ちはやふる』も『中二病』も『バジリスク』も許してくれないらしい
福井はメガネブ！の恐怖があったこともあったが、『ちはやふる』は無視されたらしい
2026年に『ざつ旅-That’s Journey-』で雑選出
2026年に『男女の友情は成立する?（いや、しないっ!!）』が選出
現在は『【推しの子】』もあるのだが、それよりも前に『うしおととら』もあるといえばある（そもそもが行きにくい場所なので聖地にならない？）
『ガーリッシュナンバー』と『ミス・モノクローム』が2020年で外れた後、2025年の『好きでも嫌いなあまのじゃく』まで5年空いている（また2026年に選出から外れている）
さくらんぼ小学校の騒動で選出されにくいのか、それとも『おにまい』が『おもひでぽろぽろ』したのか
2022年に『ハンドシェイカー』が外れたのを最後に4年間ずっと選出されていない
そもそも『ハンドシェイカー』以外にも聖地は大量にあるのにもかかわらずすべて無視することには発足当初から疑問を抱かれていたはず
2020年に『RDG レッドデータガール』が外れたのを最後に6年間ずっと選出されていない
後に政治家となった作品はもう選出されないとかのルールがあるのかは謎である
2018年に『ユーリ!!! on ICE』が選出されてから以降7年間何も選出されていない
『ゾンビランドサガ』は何のために作られたのか疑問を抱く
そのアニメ作品の聖地ではなく、作家や会社などのキャラクターによるロケーションなだけな場所しかないものを指す
宮沢賢治童話村のみ選出されており、2026年の『ざつ旅』による雑選出以外は何も作品としての選出はない
『すずめの戸締まり』が選ばれていないのは『君の名は。』における選出問題が尾を引いていると思われる
2024年に『Do It Yourself!! -どぅー・いっと・ゆあせるふ-』が選出されたためここには含まれないが、また戻る可能性有
『ドカベン』も『めぞん一刻』も『のんのんびより』も『魔法少女育成計画』も無視されるらしい
かつては『おへんろ。』が選出されていたが、現在は「マチ★アソビ」しかない
徳島をメインにした作品自体がなかなか無いのもあるが、その割には上記のイベントをテーマにした作品も出さないのには疑問を抱く
『おへんろ。』と『竜とそばかすの姫』があるので含まれていないだけ
『海がきこえる』はジブリのため無視されているが、坂本龍馬の場所でもあるため、『薄桜鬼』など困ることはない
『ものべの』はアニメ化されていないし、『ヨスガ』るですら無視されるのだからそりゃあそうである
長らくサンリオのハーモニーランドしか選出されておらず、追加された『進撃の巨人』も舞台が大分ではない
ただ『あたしンち』も『ReLIFE』も難しく、『デトロイト・メタル・シティ』ぐらいしかないという事情もある
日経平均株価が半導体指数になってニュースで話題になるが、製造装置や材料は盛り上がっているが、日本に半導体チップ設計の仕事がない。
一方、中国はというと沢山あって羨ましい。
なんか知らんけどサービス日からやってる。AFKアリーナの関連タイトルらしいけど、そっちは名前しか知らん。
メインストーリーのみフルボイス、毎シーズンストーリー更新あり、割とP2Wな設計ながらもいろんな領域のPvP・PvEがあって途中から初めても楽しめそう。
全体的に品質が高くてコンテンツ量多い割には大して時間を使わないのでやりやすい。
メインストーリーは端折りすぎでテーマパークのアトラクションかな？って感じだけど骨格は悪くなくて良い
所属しているギルドのギルマスは3代目。皆去っていく。なんとなく続けている
コーデはめっちゃ楽しい！ けどゲーム部分が割とガッツリ目でメインコンテンツ回すのも大変
アスレチック要素も原神くらいしっかりあるのでアクションゲーム苦手だったら割と大変。俺も大変
ここでコーデと撮影のスキルは得られたと思う。時間が無いのでやらなくなった
基本キャラガチャ無料で話題をかっさらったゲーム。とはいえ有料スキンメインはFacebookゲーム時代から続く歴史ある課金形態
実際無料でキャラクタは回せるが、ガチると投入時間が半端ない。そんなにはつき合えない
シナリオのノリが00年代のラノベと露悪さがあってちょい懐かしく、世界観のディストピアも相まって制作している中国人たちの内心が気になって仕方がない。
しかし前述のインフィニティニキより後にこのスキンの量とセンスでお金稼ぎは無理があると思いました。
あとフレーバーテキストが崩壊スターレイルフォロワー過ぎてキショイっす
mihoyoのタイトルは原神以降一応やってる。メインコンテンツが重たい。シナリオの品質は高い
作業量が多くて手が痛くなるのでいつの間にかやらなくなった。釣りのシーズンで離脱
シーズンイベントがワンパターンだし、別にリアルタイムで追い続ける必要ないかも？ってなった
ちゃんとえっちなシーンあって実用性はあるんじゃないでしょうか。育成要素と連動していてマゾいです。
シナリオは破破破転転破終わらんのかーい！で疲れる。なんか何でもありすぎて何でもあり
シンプル楽しくないのでやめた
微エロでビックリした！。ブラダス2以上アークレコード未満の領域。直接描写しないだけでえっちはえっちか
声優未公表だけど、なんかどっかで聞いたことありそうな人がチラホラいて、そこに刺さるといいかも。
特定キャラの要素全開放まで進めたら親愛度最終イベントだけボイスなかったんですが(憤怒)
3まで喘いでたでしょうが！ クソが！
Linuxを始めるには、まずはLinuxを体験してみて、それから基本的な操作を学ぶという2つのステップで進めるのがおすすめです。インストールにはいくつかの選択肢があり、初心者向けに作られたディストリビューションから始めるとスムーズです。
現在のPC環境を変えずにLinuxを試す方法は複数あります。
仮想マシンを使う: VirtualBoxやVMwareなどの仮想化ソフトウェアを使えば、WindowsやmacOS上でLinuxを動かすことができます。これは、現在の環境に影響を与えずにLinuxを試せる最も安全な方法です。
ライブUSBで起動する: Linuxのインストールイメージ（ISOファイル）をUSBメモリに書き込むと、「ライブ環境」としてPCを起動できます。この場合も、PCのストレージには何も変更が加えられません。
WSL (Windows Subsystem for Linux): Windows 10/11を使用している場合、WSLを使えばWindows内にLinuxの実行環境を構築できます。
ステップ2：初心者向けディストリビューションを選ぶ
Linuxにはさまざまな種類（ディストリビューション）があり、それぞれ特徴が異なります。初心者は以下の使いやすいものから始めるのがよいでしょう。
Ubuntu: 最も有名で、初心者向けのLinuxとして定番です。ユーザー数も多く、ネット上に情報が豊富にあります。
Linux Mint: Ubuntuをベースに、よりWindowsライクな操作感を目指して開発されたディストリビューションです。直感的な操作が可能なため、Windowsユーザーから乗り換える場合に適しています。
Zorin OS: WindowsやmacOSから移行するユーザー向けに、デザインや操作性を最適化したディストリビューションです。
ISOファイルをダウンロード: 選んだディストリビューションの公式サイトから、ISOファイルをダウンロードします。
ブータブルUSBを作成: Rufus（Windows）やBalenaEtcher（クロスプラットフォーム）といったツールを使い、USBメモリにISOファイルを書き込みます。
PCを再起動: 作成したブータブルUSBからPCを起動し、インストールを開始します。
デュアルブート: Windowsなどの既存のOSと共存させる方法です。起動時にOSを選択できますが、少し複雑な作業になります。
単独インストール: PCのストレージをすべてLinuxで使用する方法です。
仮想マシンにインストール: ステップ1で試した仮想マシンに本格的にインストールします。
Linuxの真価を発揮するのは、コマンドライン操作です。ターミナルを開いて、以下の基本的なコマンドを試してみましょう。
オンライン学習サイト: Linux Foundationの無料コースやLinux Journeyなど、無料で学べるオンラインリソースが多数あります。
書籍: 初心者向けの入門書は、体系的に学習するのに役立ちます。
コミュニティ: Redditのr/linux4noobsや地域のLinuxユーザーグループに参加して、質問や情報交換をするのも効果的です。
いつか空から札束が降ってきましたら、わたくし、歌だのキャラデザインだの動画だのを片っ端から外注して、豪華絢爛なミュージックビデオをお作りあそばせようと思っておりましたの。
……ところがどっこい、AI様がその夢を叶えてくださる時代が来たのですから、これはもうやらねば詐欺ですわよね！？ということでJust Do Itいたしましたの。
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Znw6q9o3Ssw
長年わたくしの脳内という狭苦しい檻でカビていた世界観が、ようやく陽の目を浴びましてよ……あぁ、涙でモニターが見えませんわ。
でも、この魔法のような力にもすぐ慣れてしまいそうですので、今のうちに自慢と感想を置き逃げいたしますわ。
お試しにボカロ風の楽曲を作ってみたくなりまして「ボカロといえばメンヘラ曲ですわよね？」という根拠不明な偏見をフル装備。
じいやに出してもらった狭心症のお薬をガン見しながらデカフェコーヒーをがぶ飲み、心臓をテーマにした歌詞をSuno様にえいやっと投げ捨てましたの。
ジャンルは「心拍ビートの憂鬱アンビエント＋ウィスパー女子」でしてよ。ええ、きっとアンビエントですわ。
出来上がりは……もぅ最高❤
文字数てきとーな歌詞なのに完璧なリズムで歌い上げ、吐息混じりで耳に直接ささやいてくるんですのよ。わたくし、思わず「結婚して」と言いかけましたわ。
しかもこのボーカル様と作曲者様、実在しないのですって！ この世にいないのにわたくしの脳を直撃してくるとか罪深いにも程がございますわ。
テクとしては、漢字は時々お中国語読みをしでかしますので、怪しいところは平仮名に開くのが吉ですわ。
再生成で微修正もできるので、間違えても泣く必要はございませんの。
複数キャラ並べるのは大変ですって？ あら、そんな面倒なこと庶民にお任せあそばせ。
わたくしは「少女！天使！羽！骸骨！心臓！」という王道厨二キャラ一択で、niji・journey様に丸投げいたしましたの。
余計な物を切り捨て、体を差し替え、お着替えさせ、全身を拵え、Midjourney様の背景と合体……もうモデルさんもビックリの撮影会でしてよ。
実写背景に二次キャラを置くのって、本当に背徳的で大好きですの。アクスタで世界旅行してるみたいでウフフ。
さらにちびキャラ、線画、油絵風まで取り揃えて、MVを宝石箱のように彩って差し上げましたの。
物語の都合上、世界中に心臓が溢れ返ったのでキャラと同数くらい心臓を量産いたしましたの。
洞窟から覗く巨大心臓を巡って兵士が撃ち合う？ 意味不明ですわね。でもAI様は文句も言わず描いてくださいますの。
なお「heart」だけですとハートマーク祭りになるので、「heart organ」や「human heart」で命を吹き込むのがコツですわ❤
まさか画像生成から動画生成の時代にワープするとは……技術革新って怖かわですわね。
ノンアルビールをたしなみつつ、Kling様にスチルをぶん投げて延々ガチャ。
実写背景二次キャラも線画も油絵も全部動きますのよ。ええ、怖いくらい。
とはいえ破綻は盛りだくさん。空と海の速度がバラバラ、傘の骨が頬骨を貫通マジックして、宙を舞う金魚がフュージョンしては分裂……まるで深夜のテンションですわ。
こういう時はプロンプト調整沼に沈むより、編集でマスク抜きやエフェクトで誤魔化すのが勝ち筋。そもそも生成させるシーンがおかしい？ それはもうお約束ですわよ❤
裏技として、背景とキャラを別々に当たりガチャし、合成してから中割りさせる方法もございますの。
AI生成なのにグリーンバック？ ええ、わたくしも笑いましたわ。けれど抜きやすいのですもの。
年初に歌を生成、「あらこれイケますわ！」と確信してGWに仮完成。
そこからワインのように「寝かせて熟成させましょう」と思ったら、お盆になっておりましたの……。
言い訳はございますのよ？ 幾度も引退したソシャゲに復帰してしまったり、ギックリ腰になったりと、庶民的アクシデントに見舞われまして。
気づけばAIモデルが一世代前に……うふふ、時代はお待ちくださらないのですわ。
それでも、この虚弱体力でも四半期に一本くらいは作れそうな手応えがございますので、今後も優雅に量産して参りますわ。おほほほほ……
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Znw6q9o3Ssw
"Bookmarking for travel is the process of saving and organizing online resources related to your trip—such as destination guides, hotel options, flight deals, restaurant recommendations, activity lists, maps, and travel blogs—so you can easily return to them later. As travel planning often involves browsing multiple websites and gathering information from various sources, bookmarking allows you to keep everything in one convenient, accessible place. Whether you're researching places to visit, comparing prices, or building a day-by-day itinerary, bookmarking helps streamline the planning process by preventing you from losing track of important pages. It also enhances your travel experience by making it easy to revisit saved content while you're on the move, even offline in some cases. With the help of browser bookmarks, travel apps, or specialized tools like Google Maps or Pinterest boards, bookmarking becomes an essential part of staying organized, inspired, and prepared throughout your journey."
"Bookmarking for travel is the process of saving and organizing online resources related to your trip—such as destination guides, hotel options, flight deals, restaurant recommendations, activity lists, maps, and travel blogs—so you can easily return to them later. As travel planning often involves browsing multiple websites and gathering information from various sources, bookmarking allows you to keep everything in one convenient, accessible place. Whether you're researching places to visit, comparing prices, or building a day-by-day itinerary, bookmarking helps streamline the planning process by preventing you from losing track of important pages. It also enhances your travel experience by making it easy to revisit saved content while you're on the move, even offline in some cases. With the help of browser bookmarks, travel apps, or specialized tools like Google Maps or Pinterest boards, bookmarking becomes an essential part of staying organized, inspired, and prepared throughout your journey."
"Bookmarking for travel is the process of saving and organizing online resources related to your trip—such as destination guides, hotel options, flight deals, restaurant recommendations, activity lists, maps, and travel blogs—so you can easily return to them later. As travel planning often involves browsing multiple websites and gathering information from various sources, bookmarking allows you to keep everything in one convenient, accessible place. Whether you're researching places to visit, comparing prices, or building a day-by-day itinerary, bookmarking helps streamline the planning process by preventing you from losing track of important pages. It also enhances your travel experience by making it easy to revisit saved content while you're on the move, even offline in some cases. With the help of browser bookmarks, travel apps, or specialized tools like Google Maps or Pinterest boards, bookmarking becomes an essential part of staying organized, inspired, and prepared throughout your journey."
"Bookmarking for travel is the process of saving and organizing online resources related to your trip—such as destination guides, hotel options, flight deals, restaurant recommendations, activity lists, maps, and travel blogs—so you can easily return to them later. As travel planning often involves browsing multiple websites and gathering information from various sources, bookmarking allows you to keep everything in one convenient, accessible place. Whether you're researching places to visit, comparing prices, or building a day-by-day itinerary, bookmarking helps streamline the planning process by preventing you from losing track of important pages. It also enhances your travel experience by making it easy to revisit saved content while you're on the move, even offline in some cases. With the help of browser bookmarks, travel apps, or specialized tools like Google Maps or Pinterest boards, bookmarking becomes an essential part of staying organized, inspired, and prepared throughout your journey."
"Bookmarking for travel is the process of saving and organizing online resources related to your trip—such as destination guides, hotel options, flight deals, restaurant recommendations, activity lists, maps, and travel blogs—so you can easily return to them later. As travel planning often involves browsing multiple websites and gathering information from various sources, bookmarking allows you to keep everything in one convenient, accessible place. Whether you're researching places to visit, comparing prices, or building a day-by-day itinerary, bookmarking helps streamline the planning process by preventing you from losing track of important pages. It also enhances your travel experience by making it easy to revisit saved content while you're on the move, even offline in some cases. With the help of browser bookmarks, travel apps, or specialized tools like Google Maps or Pinterest boards, bookmarking becomes an essential part of staying organized, inspired, and prepared throughout your journey."
"Bookmarking for travel is the process of saving and organizing online resources related to your trip—such as destination guides, hotel options, flight deals, restaurant recommendations, activity lists, maps, and travel blogs—so you can easily return to them later. As travel planning often involves browsing multiple websites and gathering information from various sources, bookmarking allows you to keep everything in one convenient, accessible place. Whether you're researching places to visit, comparing prices, or building a day-by-day itinerary, bookmarking helps streamline the planning process by preventing you from losing track of important pages. It also enhances your travel experience by making it easy to revisit saved content while you're on the move, even offline in some cases. With the help of browser bookmarks, travel apps, or specialized tools like Google Maps or Pinterest boards, bookmarking becomes an essential part of staying organized, inspired, and prepared throughout your journey."
放送中のアニメ『ざつ旅-That's Journey-』にムカついている。浅いオタクどもが高級夜行バスだとかで叩いてるがそんなことはどうでもいい。
このアニメの許しようのない問題点はただ一つ、キャラクターが全く生きていないことだ。たとえば主人公が漫画家女子大学生であるという設定だが大学生という設定が活かされることは一切ない。学業についての描写も大学の知り合いの描写もないし交通機関を学割で安く購入するといった描写もない。
旅行の参加者によって内容が変わるということもない。真っ当な作品ならその回の登場人物によって着眼点が変わったりするが、ざつ旅においては展開は作劇を薄めているだけだ。酒飲みの先輩が参加したら酒飲み描写がプラスされて旅先描写が削られるだけ。酒飲み描写が面白いわけでもないのに薄まるから困る。「ひとり旅の方が面白い」という意見があるのはそのためだろう。
Today was one of those days that reminds us why we do what we do.
The day began with an urgent call from a family in Patna. Their loved one had suffered a major cardiac event and needed to be transported to Delhi for specialized care. Within minutes, our air ambulance team sprang into action—coordinating doctors, checking equipment, preparing the aircraft, and ensuring every second counted.
By noon, the patient was stabilized and airborne. Watching the aircraft take off was a quiet, powerful moment. Behind the logistics, the calls, and the checklists, there’s always a family holding on to hope. And it’s our job to carry that hope safely across the skies.
Meanwhile, in another corner of the city, our road ambulance team was transferring a trauma patient from Gaya to Patna. Despite traffic, heat, and pressure, our paramedics remained calm, focused, and compassionate. Every heartbeat matters, and they know it.
In the evening, our team wrapped up a successful intercity train ambulance case from Ranchi to Mumbai. Long journey, steady hands, and another life moved closer to healing.
Save Life isn’t just a name. It’s a commitment.
Sometimes it’s exhausting. Sometimes it’s heartbreaking. But every day, we get the chance to make a difference. And that’s a rare, beautiful gift.
Yoshihiro Mochizuki
Japanese Language Lecturer
How does your work engage with DEI topics? Could you share a particular story related to your work in DEI?
As a Japanese language teacher at the University of Michigan, my journey in DEI education has been a profoundly enriching experience that reaches far beyond the classroom. In 2023, I had privilege of speaking at various conferences and teacher training workshops, including delivering a keynote address at the fourth Northwest Conference on Japanese Pedagogy hosted by the University of Washington. This milestone allowed me to advocate for the profound importance of DEI and social justice in Japanese language education.
Through these experiences, I have come to a profound realization: while children and students often readily embrace DEI principles, having grown up in an era where these concepts are more ingrained in education, our primary focus must be on the education of adults, particularly educators themselves.
During my presentations and workshops, I have engaged with educators, many of whom have decades of experience. They raise questions that sometimes reveal unconscious biases or microaggressions. Yet, they openly admit feeling out of touch with the ever-evolving landscape of diversity and inclusion. They express genuine concerns about their ability to relate to and support students from diverse backgrounds.
This interaction spotlights a substantial challenge faced by educators today, a reminder that the world is in constant flux, and it is our shared responsibility as educators to adapt alongside it. These encounters are what drive my passion for DEI education. My work extends beyond the classroom, aiming to bridge the gap between theory and practice, guiding fellow educators toward inclusivity, understanding, and social justice.
As we move forward, it is imperative to recognize that fostering diversity, equity, and inclusion is not solely the responsibility of students but a collective endeavor that starts with us, the educators.
In conclusion, my journey in Japanese language education has taught me that the true power of DEI education lies in its ability to transform educators. This transformation, in turn, shapes a more inclusive future for our students. Embracing DEI principles enriches not only our teaching but also our society as a whole. Together, as a community of educators dedicated to diversity, equity, and inclusion, we take significant strides toward creating a more just and inclusive world, one classroom at a time.
あなたの仕事はDEIのテーマとどのように関わっていますか？DEIに関する具体的なエピソードがあれば教えていただけますか？
ミシガン大学で日本語教師としてDEI教育に携わってきた私の歩みは、教室の枠をはるかに超えた、非常に豊かな経験でした。2023年には、ワシントン大学主催の第4回北西日本語教育学会議での基調講演をはじめ、様々な会議や教師研修ワークショップで講演する機会に恵まれました。この節目を通して、日本語教育におけるDEIと社会正義の深遠な重要性を訴えることができました。
これらの経験を通じて、私は深い認識に達しました。それは、DEI の原則が教育に深く根ざした時代に育った子供や学生は、多くの場合、積極的に DEI の原則を受け入れますが、私たちが主に重点を置くべきは、大人、特に教育者自身の教育であるということです。
プレゼンテーションやワークショップを通して、私は教育者の方々と交流してきました。その多くは数十年の経験を持つ方々です。彼らは、時に無意識の偏見やマイクロアグレッションを露呈するような疑問を投げかけます。しかし同時に、彼らは常に進化を続ける多様性と包摂性という状況に疎外感を抱いていることを率直に認めています。多様な背景を持つ生徒たちと関わり、サポートしていく能力について、真摯な懸念を表明しています。
この交流は、今日の教育者が直面する重大な課題を浮き彫りにし、世界は常に変化し続けており、教育者としてそれに適応していくことが共通の責任であることを改めて認識させてくれます。こうした出会いが、DEI教育への私の情熱を駆り立てています。私の仕事は教室にとどまらず、理論と実践のギャップを埋め、他の教育者を包摂性、理解、そして社会正義へと導くことを目指しています。
今後、多様性、公平性、包括性を育むことは学生だけの責任ではなく、私たち教育者から始まる共同の取り組みであることを認識することが不可欠です。
最後に、日本語教育に携わってきた経験を通して、DEI教育の真の力は教育者を変革する力にあることを学びました。この変革は、ひいては生徒たちにとってよりインクルーシブな未来を形作ります。DEIの原則を受け入れることは、私たちの教育だけでなく、社会全体を豊かにします。多様性、公平性、そしてインクルージョンに献身する教育者のコミュニティとして、私たちは共に、一つ一つの教室から、より公正でインクルーシブな世界の創造に向けて大きく前進していきます。
https://lsa.umich.edu/asian/dei/spotlight.html
もっちりんだ 🇺🇸 🇯🇵 🏳️🌈
@mochiey
学部からのお達しで、私のこのページ、もうすぐ消えることになったので、よかったら消える前に読んでくださ～い。
https://x.com/mochiey/status/1912156111953662160
もっちりんだ 🇺🇸 🇯🇵 🏳️🌈
@mochiey
Teaching Professor of Japanese Language | University of Michigan 🇺🇸生活・Podcasts・日本語教育・人権 (LGBTQ+, フェミニズム), etc. Posts are my own. 他のSNSも 全て
@mochiey
でやってます。
すごく軽いね。もうすこしなんかないの？学問の自由とか言うことはないの？
大変申し訳ないのですが、これは消されて当然だし
6分
大学のサイトからDEIのページを消さないと、というより大学からDEIを排除しないと連邦政府からの支援金がもらえなくなるからね。
こういう報いを受けても仕方ないのでは。だって何一つ書いていないんだもの。
「profound importance」「profound realization」「shared responsibility」「transform educators」など、抽象度の高いフレーズばかりで、具体的な教育実践が見えません。
例：「どんな学生に、どのような教材を用いて、どういった変化が見られたのか」といった具体的な成果・実例が欠如。
「教育者と話して無意識のバイアスに気づいた」ことを語っていますが、どんな内容だったのか、どういう改善に繋がったのか、事例がないため説得力が弱い。
そもそもこの文章では、DEI（Diversity, Equity, Inclusion）を日本語教育の中でどう具体的に扱うのかが一切記述されていません。
たとえば「教材に出てくる名前や職業を見直した」「LGBTQの観点を授業で扱った」などの実施例が欠落。
トランプがカネを出さないというのは極めて至極まっとうで、この文章で人が感動することも共感することも同情することも理解することもない。
なに言ってるんだ。そのアカウント名もふざけている場合じゃないだろう。
あと大学もお金をもらわなくても大丈夫なんだから、大学にお金を出さなくてもいいのかも。
日本も見習うべきですね。
First dates can be exciting and nerve-wracking all at once. You’re meeting someone new, learning about their interests, and trying to figure out if there’s chemistry between you. And then there’s flirting, that delicate dance of showing someone you’re interested without being too forward or awkward.
Flirting doesn’t have to be a high-pressure situation. In fact, it can be the most fun part of getting to know someone. Whether you're meeting someone on MixerDates or any other platform, the most important thing is to be genuine, stay calm, and let the connection develop naturally.
If you’ve ever found yourself wondering how to flirt on a first date without feeling uncomfortable, you’re not alone. Everyone has their awkward moments, but the more you understand the art of flirting, the easier it becomes. In this article, we’ll break down how to flirt in a way that feels natural, exciting, and authentic to who you are. So, let's dive in and learn how to make the most of your first date experience—without overthinking it.
When it comes to flirting, confidence is key. But what does it really mean to be confident on a first date? Confidence doesn’t mean you need to be perfect, or even outgoing—it simply means being comfortable in your own skin and showing up as your authentic self.
Have you ever noticed how people are drawn to those who radiate self-assurance? It’s not about bragging or dominating the conversation—it’s about presenting yourself with ease. If you feel good about yourself, it will naturally show. A great smile, good posture, and eye contact can go a long way in making a good first impression.
For instance, think about the last time someone walked into a room and immediately caught your attention—not because they were the most attractive person in the room, but because of their energy. They were confident, they were present, and they made you feel at ease. That’s the kind of confidence you want to project on your date.
When you're confident, you're not worried about saying the perfect thing. Instead, you focus on enjoying the moment, making the other person feel comfortable, and letting the connection happen naturally. That’s the magic of confidence—it allows you to be present, fun, and, most importantly, yourself.
Let’s face it—no one wants to feel like they’re being “worked” or put through a game. That’s why subtlety is such a powerful tool when it comes to flirting. It's all about showing interest without being over-the-top or too obvious.
Flirting doesn’t always mean complimenting someone non-stop or using cheesy pickup lines. In fact, the most successful flirting is the kind that happens behind the scenes—subtle, playful, and lighthearted. Think about the little moments, like a teasing comment about how they always order the same thing at a restaurant or the way you laugh at a silly joke they make.
The key is to find a balance. A simple smile or a playful comment can convey interest without being too much. For example, if your date tells you they love hiking but they tend to get lost easily, you could say something like, “So, you’re telling me you need a personal guide? I could get behind that!” It’s lighthearted, humorous, and most importantly, it keeps the conversation fun without putting too much pressure on the situation.
By keeping it subtle, you allow your date to feel at ease. It takes the pressure off them to be perfect and allows both of you to enjoy the interaction more naturally. Flirting doesn’t need to be a performance—it’s about creating an environment where both of you can feel comfortable and authentic.
Now, let’s talk about something incredibly important in the flirting game: active listening. When we’re on a date, we often get caught up in thinking about what to say next, how we’re coming across, or if we’re being interesting enough. But the best way to make an impression? Truly listening to your date.
Active listening means you’re fully engaged in the conversation, giving your date your full attention and responding thoughtfully. It’s about showing that you care about what they’re saying and that you’re genuinely interested in getting to know them better. When you listen actively, you’re also giving them space to open up, and that can create an immediate connection.
For example, if your date mentions they recently traveled to Japan, instead of simply saying, “That’s cool!” you could follow up with something like, “What was the most memorable experience you had there?” This shows that you’re not just hearing their words but are genuinely curious and invested in their experiences. It’s a great way to build rapport and let them know you’re not just there to impress them—you’re there to connect.
While your words are important, body language often speaks louder than anything you can say. Whether you realize it or not, your body is constantly communicating how you feel. How you sit, stand, and move tells your date whether you’re relaxed, engaged, or distracted.
Small gestures can go a long way in flirting. A light touch on the arm, a subtle lean in when they’re speaking, or maintaining good eye contact—all these body language cues help signal your interest. And the great thing is, when done naturally, these cues can be just as effective as words.
For example, if you’re sitting at a café on your date and you lean in slightly when they’re sharing a funny story, you’re not just showing that you’re interested—you’re inviting them into your space. It’s an invitation to connect further. And when they respond by leaning in too, that’s when the magic happens—the unspoken connection that tells you both that there’s potential for more.
Flirting through body language doesn’t mean making grand gestures or being overly touchy. It’s about being present and showing that you’re engaged with your date in a subtle, but meaningful way.
It’s easy to get caught up in overthinking how to flirt or trying to figure out if your date is into you. But here’s a secret—when you let go of the pressure and allow yourself to have fun, everything flows much more naturally. Flirting on a first date doesn’t need to feel like a test or an assignment. It’s supposed to be a fun, lighthearted experience that sets the stage for more great dates ahead.
When was the last time you had a genuinely fun date? Was it when you were trying too hard to impress, or when you were both laughing, chatting, and enjoying each other's company? Flirting becomes effortless when you're present, enjoying the moment, and letting the connection grow naturally.
Sometimes, it's the small moments—like sharing a laugh or swapping embarrassing stories—that make a first date truly special. When you focus on having fun, you create an environment where both of you can relax, flirt, and let the chemistry grow. That’s the secret to a great date.
One of the best things about using a platform like MixerDates is that it takes the guesswork out of the equation. By connecting with someone who already shares your interests and values, you’ve got a head start on making a real connection. No more swiping through countless profiles hoping for a spark—on MixerDates, you already know there’s something in common.
When you’re already on the same page with your date, flirting comes more easily. There’s less of that awkward, “Are we even on the same wavelength?” feeling, and more of the fun, “Wow, we really click!” vibe. Whether you’re talking about favorite hobbies, movies, or life goals, the conversation flows naturally, making the flirting feel effortless.
If you're looking for a place to meet like-minded people and build genuine connections, MixerDates is the perfect platform. It's a great place to find someone who appreciates you for who you are and who you can naturally flirt with, without the stress.
Flirting on a first date is all about confidence, connection, and fun. When you let go of the pressure and focus on enjoying the experience, the chemistry will naturally follow. Remember, the best way to flirt is by being yourself—let your personality shine through, listen with intention, and embrace the moment.
And if you’re ready to meet someone new, who’s just as interested in making a connection as you are, MixerDates is the perfect place to start. So go ahead, take the leap, and see where it leads. Who knows? Your next great connection might be just a click away.
Sign up for MixerDates today and start your journey to exciting first dates and meaningful connections!
Please consider the histroy of humanity from biological perpsecitve and current known fact in nearby universe, which expo-planet (from the Sol system perspective) is most likely to have civlizaed society? Please add percentage next to it in the chart
ChatGPT
Reasoned about exoplanet civilization likelihoodを28 秒行う
Evaluating planetary prospects
OK, I’m looking at the likelihood of a civilized society on an exoplanet within our Solar System. I’ll consider biological history and current space knowledge, aiming to identify the most promising candidate.
Identifying potential candidates
I'm considering exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1e, which might suggest they are within or observed from our Solar System.
Assessing potential candidates
I’m evaluating Proxima Centauri b, Barnard's Star, LHS 1140, and TRAPPIST-1, focusing on their habitable zones and available data. The Drake equation might help estimate their civilized society likelihoods.
Identifying promising exoplanets
I’m noting key exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1, which have Earth-like characteristics and are in habitable zones. This narrows down the potential candidates for advanced civilizations.
I'm gathering info on planets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1, considering factors like magnetic fields, atmospheres, and proximity to G-type stars for their potential to support advanced civilizations.
Evaluating exoplanet prospects
I'm noting that Proxima Centauri b, despite being close and around a red dwarf star, might support life if it has a magnetic field and atmosphere. This makes me think about its potential.
Charting probabilities
I'm estimating civilization probabilities for exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e, using speculative percentages based on the Drake equation and the lack of evidence for intelligent life.
I'm crafting a chart with exoplanet names and civilization likelihood percentages, grounded in the long timeline of life's evolution, despite the speculative nature of these figures.
Identifying exoplanet contenders
I’m evaluating exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b, TRAPPIST-1 e, and Kepler-186f, considering their star types and distances, to gauge their potential for supporting advanced civilizations from our solar system's viewpoint.
Weighing proximity and observation
I'm leaning towards Proxima Centauri b due to its closeness and observational potential, despite concerns about its flare star dynamics. TRAPPIST-1 e, f, or g are also worth considering.
I'm focusing on exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b, Ross 128 b, LHS 1140 b, TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, and K2-18b, aiming to chart their likelihood of hosting a civilized society based on current knowledge.
Assessing exoplanet potentials
I'm gathering speculative probabilities for exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, using the Drake equation and current understanding, to better estimate their chances of hosting a civilized society.
Refining speculative probabilities
I’m refining speculative probabilities for exoplanets, including Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, to estimate their chances of hosting a civilized society, considering Earth's long biological history.
Refining odds
I'm considering the astronomical timeline for intelligent life on Earth, leading me to assign even lower speculative odds for exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e.
I’m crafting a simplified chart with arbitrary percentages, clearly noting the speculative nature and lack of scientific data, while considering the target audience's basic understanding of the topic.
I’m charting arbitrary percentages for exoplanets, clarifying their speculative nature, and ensuring the data is accessible for young audiences with minimal scientific detail.
Crafting a chart
I’m creating a markdown table with speculative percentages for the likelihood of civilized life on exoplanets, emphasizing their purely theoretical nature and considering the understanding level of an 8-year-old.
Integrating speculative analysis
I’m mapping out a markdown chart with speculative percentages for the likelihood of a civilized society on exoplanets, mindful of the complexity and simplifying for an 8-year-old's understanding.
I’m piecing together markdown for exoplanets, noting Proxima Centauri b's reduced civilized life chance due to the red dwarf's activity. This inclusion highlights the speculative nature of the analysis.
Piecing together speculative odds
I’m detailing a markdown chart for audience-friendly exoplanet likelihoods, considering environmental challenges and adding a disclaimer about the speculative nature and lack of evidence.
Piecing together
I’m leaning towards Proxima Centauri b for its proximity and silent star, but I’ll add a speculative chart ranking nearby exoplanets, noting their advanced civilizations' hypothetical likelihood.
Assessing civilization probabilities
I'm emphasizing the slow emergence of intelligent life on Earth, which suggests that the odds of any habitable planet developing a complex civilization might be as low as a few percent.
Below is a very speculative chart that—based on what we know about Earth’s long, winding path from simple life to a “civilized society” and our limited observations of nearby exoplanets—gives some fun, made‑up percentage chances for a few of our best candidate exoplanets. Remember: Scientists have not yet found any proof of life (let alone advanced civilizations) on any exoplanet. These numbers are just playful estimates to help you think about the ideas!
Speculative Chances of Finding an Advanced Civilization on Nearby Exoplanets
Exoplanet Estimated Likelihood of a Civilized Society
Proxima Centauri b ~2%
LHS 1140 b ~0.5%
How Did We (Very Roughly) Guess These Numbers?
Earth’s Example:
On Earth, life began as simple single‑celled organisms and took billions of years to evolve into a species that built complex societies. This long journey suggests that—even if a planet is in the “habitable zone” (where liquid water could exist)—developing an advanced, civilized society might be rare.
Proxima Centauri b:
This is the closest exoplanet to us. Even though its star (Proxima Centauri) is a red dwarf that sometimes sends out strong flares (which might harm life), its closeness makes it one of our most interesting candidates. That’s why we give it a slightly higher guess (~2%).
These planets are part of a group orbiting a very cool star. Their environments might be challenging (for example, they could be tidally locked, meaning one side always faces the star), so the chance of a complex, advanced civilization might be a bit lower.
LHS 1140 b:
This planet is promising in some ways but is a little farther away and around a dimmer star, so our playful estimate is even lower.
All of these percentages are extremely rough guesses based on what little we understand about the conditions for life and intelligence. Scientists use ideas like the Drake Equation to think about these chances—but until we have concrete evidence, these numbers remain just for fun and imagination.
Enjoy exploring these ideas—and remember, space is full of mysteries waiting to be discovered!
あなた:
Please examine the Drake Equation itself and see if this euqation is acculate or more opition in the equation you will use
ChatGPT
Reasoned about the Drake Equationを6 秒行う
re-examining the Drake Equation
evaluating the Drake Equation's value
OK, let me see. The Drake Equation isn't a precise formula; it's more of a guiding heuristic that tackles numerous uncertainties regarding extraterrestrial civilizations.
Thinking through the Drake Equation, I’m evaluating its conceptual nature, its uncertain parameters, and its criticism to conclude on its reliability as an accurate predictive model.
Understanding the Drake Equation
I’m mapping out the Drake Equation as a conceptual guide, detailing its parameters, which are often based on estimates or opinions, to evaluate its reliability for predicting extraterrestrial civilizations.
The Drake Equation is a famous formula that was created to help scientists think about the many factors involved in estimating the number of detectable extraterrestrial civilizations in our galaxy. However, when we look at the equation closely, we see that it is more of a conceptual framework or heuristic tool than a precise, predictive formula. Let’s break down why:
The equation is usually written as:
𝑁
=
𝑅
∗
×
𝑓
𝑝
×
𝑛
𝑒
×
𝑓
𝑙
×
𝑓
𝑖
×
𝑓
𝑐
×
𝐿
N=R
∗
×f
p
×n
e
×f
l
×f
i
×f
c
×L
Where:
𝑅
∗
R
∗
: The average rate of star formation per year in our galaxy.
𝑓
𝑝
f
p
: The fraction of those stars that have planetary systems.
𝑛
𝑒
n
e
: The average number of planets that could potentially support life per star with planets.
𝑓
𝑙
f
l
: The fraction of those planets where life actually develops.
𝑓
𝑖
f
i
: The fraction of planets with life where intelligent life evolves.
𝑓
𝑐
f
c
: The fraction of civilizations that develop technology that releases detectable signals into space.
𝐿
L: The length of time such civilizations release detectable signals.
Why the Drake Equation Is More of a Guideline Than a Precise Formula
Uncertain Inputs:
𝑅
∗
R
∗
𝑓
𝑝
f
p
(fraction of stars with planets), have become better known through modern astronomy.
The parameters related to the development of life and intelligence—
𝑓
𝑙
f
l
,
𝑓
𝑖
f
i
,
𝑓
𝑐
f
c
, and
𝐿
L—are based on very limited data. For example, Earth is the only planet we know where life has developed, so we have no way to compare or derive a statistically robust estimate for these factors. This means that the values chosen for these parameters are largely subjective estimates or educated guesses.
Wide Ranges of Possible Values:
Because many of these factors are not well-constrained, if you change one of the more uncertain parameters even slightly, the final estimate for
𝑁
N (the number of civilizations) can vary by many orders of magnitude. This wide range shows that the equation can lead to very different outcomes based on personal or theoretical assumptions.
The Drake Equation was never meant to provide a precise answer. Instead, it serves as a way to organize our thinking about what conditions might be necessary for the development of extraterrestrial civilizations. It encourages discussion about the relative importance of different factors and highlights where our scientific knowledge is limited.
Is the Drake Equation Accurate or More Opinion-Based?
Accurate?
In the sense of being a strict mathematical model with well-defined inputs and predictable outputs, the Drake Equation is not accurate. Its accuracy is limited by the extreme uncertainties in several of its key parameters.
Many of the terms in the equation, especially those concerning the evolution of life and intelligence, are based on opinion, interpretation, and the single example of Earth. Therefore, while the structure of the equation is logical, the numbers you put into it (and hence the final result) are often more reflective of our current opinions and assumptions than of robust empirical data.
The Drake Equation is a valuable tool for framing the question of extraterrestrial life. It helps scientists and enthusiasts break down a complex problem into smaller, more manageable questions. However, because several of its factors are highly uncertain and subject to personal interpretation, it is more of a conceptual guide—or even a way to stimulate discussion—than a formula that provides a definitive, accurate prediction of the number of extraterrestrial civilizations.
In summary, while the Drake Equation is useful for thinking about the various factors that might lead to the emergence of a civilization, its outputs should be taken as highly speculative estimates rather than precise measurements.
あなた:
Please also consider the possiblities of non-human intelligent emrgencing from the long history of Sol system and nearby planets and see if there is any possiblites that in one time intelligent life emerged in nearby planets and see this to the equation
ChatGPT
Reasoned about non-human intelligence and the Drake Equationを19 秒行う
Evaluating non-human intelligence
I'm thinking about the potential for non-human intelligent life forms in the Sol system and neighboring planets, and how this might factor into the equation.
Piecing together possibilities
I'm thinking about how to integrate the emergence of non-human intelligent life, possibly on Mars or Europa, into the Drake Equation for the Sol system and neighboring planets.
It's interesting to think about the hypothesis of intelligent life emerging on Mars or Venus, though Earth remains the only known life-supporting planet in the solar system.
Considering other realms
I'm examining if intelligent life could have emerged on planets like Mars, Venus, or Europa, and how this possibility aligns with the predictions of the Drake Equation.
Hmm, I’m thinking about how non-human intelligent life on Mars or Venus could intersect with the assumptions of the Drake Equation, which seems to focus solely on Earth-based evolution.
I’m piecing together the hypothesis of non-human, advanced, intelligent life in the solar system. Mars, Venus, and Titan present challenges, but Europa and Enceladus might harbor microbial life.
Adapting the equ
Please consider the histroy of humanity from biological perpsecitve and current known fact in nearby universe, which expo-planet (from the Sol system perspective) is most likely to have civlizaed society? Please add percentage next to it in the chart
ChatGPT
Reasoned about exoplanet civilization likelihoodを28 秒行う
Evaluating planetary prospects
OK, I’m looking at the likelihood of a civilized society on an exoplanet within our Solar System. I’ll consider biological history and current space knowledge, aiming to identify the most promising candidate.
Identifying potential candidates
I'm considering exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1e, which might suggest they are within or observed from our Solar System.
Assessing potential candidates
I’m evaluating Proxima Centauri b, Barnard's Star, LHS 1140, and TRAPPIST-1, focusing on their habitable zones and available data. The Drake equation might help estimate their civilized society likelihoods.
Identifying promising exoplanets
I’m noting key exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1, which have Earth-like characteristics and are in habitable zones. This narrows down the potential candidates for advanced civilizations.
I'm gathering info on planets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1, considering factors like magnetic fields, atmospheres, and proximity to G-type stars for their potential to support advanced civilizations.
Evaluating exoplanet prospects
I'm noting that Proxima Centauri b, despite being close and around a red dwarf star, might support life if it has a magnetic field and atmosphere. This makes me think about its potential.
Charting probabilities
I'm estimating civilization probabilities for exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e, using speculative percentages based on the Drake equation and the lack of evidence for intelligent life.
I'm crafting a chart with exoplanet names and civilization likelihood percentages, grounded in the long timeline of life's evolution, despite the speculative nature of these figures.
Identifying exoplanet contenders
I’m evaluating exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b, TRAPPIST-1 e, and Kepler-186f, considering their star types and distances, to gauge their potential for supporting advanced civilizations from our solar system's viewpoint.
Weighing proximity and observation
I'm leaning towards Proxima Centauri b due to its closeness and observational potential, despite concerns about its flare star dynamics. TRAPPIST-1 e, f, or g are also worth considering.
I'm focusing on exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b, Ross 128 b, LHS 1140 b, TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, and K2-18b, aiming to chart their likelihood of hosting a civilized society based on current knowledge.
Assessing exoplanet potentials
I'm gathering speculative probabilities for exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, using the Drake equation and current understanding, to better estimate their chances of hosting a civilized society.
Refining speculative probabilities
I’m refining speculative probabilities for exoplanets, including Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, to estimate their chances of hosting a civilized society, considering Earth's long biological history.
Refining odds
I'm considering the astronomical timeline for intelligent life on Earth, leading me to assign even lower speculative odds for exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e.
I’m crafting a simplified chart with arbitrary percentages, clearly noting the speculative nature and lack of scientific data, while considering the target audience's basic understanding of the topic.
I’m charting arbitrary percentages for exoplanets, clarifying their speculative nature, and ensuring the data is accessible for young audiences with minimal scientific detail.
Crafting a chart
I’m creating a markdown table with speculative percentages for the likelihood of civilized life on exoplanets, emphasizing their purely theoretical nature and considering the understanding level of an 8-year-old.
Integrating speculative analysis
I’m mapping out a markdown chart with speculative percentages for the likelihood of a civilized society on exoplanets, mindful of the complexity and simplifying for an 8-year-old's understanding.
I’m piecing together markdown for exoplanets, noting Proxima Centauri b's reduced civilized life chance due to the red dwarf's activity. This inclusion highlights the speculative nature of the analysis.
Piecing together speculative odds
I’m detailing a markdown chart for audience-friendly exoplanet likelihoods, considering environmental challenges and adding a disclaimer about the speculative nature and lack of evidence.
Piecing together
I’m leaning towards Proxima Centauri b for its proximity and silent star, but I’ll add a speculative chart ranking nearby exoplanets, noting their advanced civilizations' hypothetical likelihood.
Assessing civilization probabilities
I'm emphasizing the slow emergence of intelligent life on Earth, which suggests that the odds of any habitable planet developing a complex civilization might be as low as a few percent.
Below is a very speculative chart that—based on what we know about Earth’s long, winding path from simple life to a “civilized society” and our limited observations of nearby exoplanets—gives some fun, made‑up percentage chances for a few of our best candidate exoplanets. Remember: Scientists have not yet found any proof of life (let alone advanced civilizations) on any exoplanet. These numbers are just playful estimates to help you think about the ideas!
Speculative Chances of Finding an Advanced Civilization on Nearby Exoplanets
Exoplanet Estimated Likelihood of a Civilized Society
Proxima Centauri b ~2%
LHS 1140 b ~0.5%
How Did We (Very Roughly) Guess These Numbers?
Earth’s Example:
On Earth, life began as simple single‑celled organisms and took billions of years to evolve into a species that built complex societies. This long journey suggests that—even if a planet is in the “habitable zone” (where liquid water could exist)—developing an advanced, civilized society might be rare.
Proxima Centauri b:
This is the closest exoplanet to us. Even though its star (Proxima Centauri) is a red dwarf that sometimes sends out strong flares (which might harm life), its closeness makes it one of our most interesting candidates. That’s why we give it a slightly higher guess (~2%).
These planets are part of a group orbiting a very cool star. Their environments might be challenging (for example, they could be tidally locked, meaning one side always faces the star), so the chance of a complex, advanced civilization might be a bit lower.
LHS 1140 b:
This planet is promising in some ways but is a little farther away and around a dimmer star, so our playful estimate is even lower.
All of these percentages are extremely rough guesses based on what little we understand about the conditions for life and intelligence. Scientists use ideas like the Drake Equation to think about these chances—but until we have concrete evidence, these numbers remain just for fun and imagination.
Enjoy exploring these ideas—and remember, space is full of mysteries waiting to be discovered!
あなた:
Please examine the Drake Equation itself and see if this euqation is acculate or more opition in the equation you will use
ChatGPT
Reasoned about the Drake Equationを6 秒行う
re-examining the Drake Equation
evaluating the Drake Equation's value
OK, let me see. The Drake Equation isn't a precise formula; it's more of a guiding heuristic that tackles numerous uncertainties regarding extraterrestrial civilizations.
Thinking through the Drake Equation, I’m evaluating its conceptual nature, its uncertain parameters, and its criticism to conclude on its reliability as an accurate predictive model.
Understanding the Drake Equation
I’m mapping out the Drake Equation as a conceptual guide, detailing its parameters, which are often based on estimates or opinions, to evaluate its reliability for predicting extraterrestrial civilizations.
The Drake Equation is a famous formula that was created to help scientists think about the many factors involved in estimating the number of detectable extraterrestrial civilizations in our galaxy. However, when we look at the equation closely, we see that it is more of a conceptual framework or heuristic tool than a precise, predictive formula. Let’s break down why:
The equation is usually written as:
𝑁
=
𝑅
∗
×
𝑓
𝑝
×
𝑛
𝑒
×
𝑓
𝑙
×
𝑓
𝑖
×
𝑓
𝑐
×
𝐿
N=R
∗
×f
p
×n
e
×f
l
×f
i
×f
c
×L
Where:
𝑅
∗
R
∗
: The average rate of star formation per year in our galaxy.
𝑓
𝑝
f
p
: The fraction of those stars that have planetary systems.
𝑛
𝑒
n
e
: The average number of planets that could potentially support life per star with planets.
𝑓
𝑙
f
l
: The fraction of those planets where life actually develops.
𝑓
𝑖
f
i
: The fraction of planets with life where intelligent life evolves.
𝑓
𝑐
f
c
: The fraction of civilizations that develop technology that releases detectable signals into space.
𝐿
L: The length of time such civilizations release detectable signals.
Why the Drake Equation Is More of a Guideline Than a Precise Formula
Uncertain Inputs:
𝑅
∗
R
∗
𝑓
𝑝
f
p
(fraction of stars with planets), have become better known through modern astronomy.
The parameters related to the development of life and intelligence—
𝑓
𝑙
f
l
,
𝑓
𝑖
f
i
,
𝑓
𝑐
f
c
, and
𝐿
L—are based on very limited data. For example, Earth is the only planet we know where life has developed, so we have no way to compare or derive a statistically robust estimate for these factors. This means that the values chosen for these parameters are largely subjective estimates or educated guesses.
Wide Ranges of Possible Values:
Because many of these factors are not well-constrained, if you change one of the more uncertain parameters even slightly, the final estimate for
𝑁
N (the number of civilizations) can vary by many orders of magnitude. This wide range shows that the equation can lead to very different outcomes based on personal or theoretical assumptions.
The Drake Equation was never meant to provide a precise answer. Instead, it serves as a way to organize our thinking about what conditions might be necessary for the development of extraterrestrial civilizations. It encourages discussion about the relative importance of different factors and highlights where our scientific knowledge is limited.
Is the Drake Equation Accurate or More Opinion-Based?
Accurate?
In the sense of being a strict mathematical model with well-defined inputs and predictable outputs, the Drake Equation is not accurate. Its accuracy is limited by the extreme uncertainties in several of its key parameters.
Many of the terms in the equation, especially those concerning the evolution of life and intelligence, are based on opinion, interpretation, and the single example of Earth. Therefore, while the structure of the equation is logical, the numbers you put into it (and hence the final result) are often more reflective of our current opinions and assumptions than of robust empirical data.
The Drake Equation is a valuable tool for framing the question of extraterrestrial life. It helps scientists and enthusiasts break down a complex problem into smaller, more manageable questions. However, because several of its factors are highly uncertain and subject to personal interpretation, it is more of a conceptual guide—or even a way to stimulate discussion—than a formula that provides a definitive, accurate prediction of the number of extraterrestrial civilizations.
In summary, while the Drake Equation is useful for thinking about the various factors that might lead to the emergence of a civilization, its outputs should be taken as highly speculative estimates rather than precise measurements.
あなた:
Please also consider the possiblities of non-human intelligent emrgencing from the long history of Sol system and nearby planets and see if there is any possiblites that in one time intelligent life emerged in nearby planets and see this to the equation
ChatGPT
Reasoned about non-human intelligence and the Drake Equationを19 秒行う
Evaluating non-human intelligence
I'm thinking about the potential for non-human intelligent life forms in the Sol system and neighboring planets, and how this might factor into the equation.
Piecing together possibilities
I'm thinking about how to integrate the emergence of non-human intelligent life, possibly on Mars or Europa, into the Drake Equation for the Sol system and neighboring planets.
It's interesting to think about the hypothesis of intelligent life emerging on Mars or Venus, though Earth remains the only known life-supporting planet in the solar system.
Considering other realms
I'm examining if intelligent life could have emerged on planets like Mars, Venus, or Europa, and how this possibility aligns with the predictions of the Drake Equation.
Hmm, I’m thinking about how non-human intelligent life on Mars or Venus could intersect with the assumptions of the Drake Equation, which seems to focus solely on Earth-based evolution.
I’m piecing together the hypothesis of non-human, advanced, intelligent life in the solar system. Mars, Venus, and Titan present challenges, but Europa and Enceladus might harbor microbial life.
Adapting the equ
NCSOFTから「Journey of Monarch - 君主の道ってゲームが出たでー遊んでくれやでー」ってメールが来たから
一応どんなもんか公式開いてみたんすわ
なーんも分からん、とにかく公式は一見AAAタイトルと見紛う映像美でトレーラーを流してくる
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=drX4s3RO92A
中身は一切伝わってこないのが潔いくらいPV詐欺ゲー感を醸し出してる
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OkJznn04-NQ
リネージュの後継作で一応MMOらしいんだが、見下ろし型の放置RPGだな
自軍の数キャラと相手のボスで棒立ち殴り合いをする放置バトルを繰り返すだけに見える
はー、フォトリアル調ってのはゴミを一見まともなもんに見せかけるのに本当便利だな
日本人でやる人おらんやろ…いや韓国人も欧米人もまずやらんかな
もはやリネージュシリーズのファンにすら唾吐くような出来といっても過言
NCSOFT大丈夫なのか
ライバルだったNEXONはブルーアーカイブやらThe First Descendantやら時代に即したヒット作を出せているのに
JOURNEYは曲が良いのはもちろんだけど、色んなフェードアウトのパターンがあるのでいくつか紹介。
Don't Stop Believin'
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1k8craCGpgs
JOURNEYで一番有名のなこの曲はサビが一番ラストに来るという構成で、そのサビを繰り返しながらにフェードアウト。
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fEpFf2towVU
この曲は逆にサビから始まってサビでフェードアウトという構成。
Be Good to Yourself
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KhsRulRxCas
JOURNEYのリーダーと言えば名ギタリストのニール・ショーンということで、特にロックチューンはギターソロでフェードアウトしていくパターンも。
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EX-_WkUxyLU
バラードでラストに泣きのギターをかき鳴らしながらフェードアウトするパターンもあり、ギターソロをもっと聞かせてほしいというところでフェードアウト。
Stone in Love
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4fKOzeUBIMI
これはニール・ショーンがギターソロを聞かせつつ、スティーブ・ペリーがサビの一節のコーラスで入れつつフェードアウト。
Wheel in the Sky
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dag_t8W-71w
このアルバムで脱退したドラマーのエインズレー・ダンバーのカッコいいプレイをフィーチャーして、まだまだ曲が続きそうなところでフェードアウト。
Why Can't This Night Go On Forever
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J9vuGWjAIzQ
スティーブ・ペリーの熱唱、ニール・ショーンの泣きのギターソロで盛り上がった後、ジョナサン・ケインの印象的なピアノがリフレインしつつフェードアウト。
ちなみにこんなに色んなパターンのフェードアウト曲を作ったJOURNEYだけど、90年代以降のアルバムではフェードアウトで終わる曲がかなり少なくなるので、音楽にも流行り廃りはあるなと思いました。
ここでいう「そのまま」とは、例えば「呪術廻戦」→「Jujutsu Kaisen」といったものを指す。
| 日本語タイトル | 英語タイトル | 所感 |
| 名探偵コナン | Case Closed | 全然ピンとこない |
| 覚悟のススメ | Apocalypse Zero | 全然ピンとこない |
| こちら葛飾区亀有公園前派出所 | KochiKame: Tokyo Beat Cops | 下町要素どこいった |
| 鬼滅の刃 | Demon Slayer:Kimetsu no Yaiba | 鬼滅感どこいった |
| 侵略!イカ娘 | Squid Girl | 侵略要素どこいった |
| 行け!稲中卓球部 | The Ping Pong Club | 稲中要素どこいった |
| Re:ゼロから始める異世界生活 | Re:Zero -Starting Life in Another World | 日本語版副題どこいった |
| 五等分の花嫁 | The Quintessential Quintuplets | 花嫁要素どこいった、だが響きは良い |
| 古見さんは、コミュ症です。 | Komi Can't Communicate | なんか響きが良い |
| ヤンキー君とメガネちゃん | Flunk Punk Rumble | なんか響きが良い |
| 地獄先生ぬ〜べ〜 | Hell Teacher: Jigoku Sensei Nube | なんか響きが良い |
| 食戟のソーマ | Food Wars!: Shokugeki no Soma | もう少しなんとかならなかったのか |
| 北斗の拳 | Fist of the North Star | もう少しなんとかならなかったのか |
| 浦安鉄筋家族 | Super Radical Gag Family | もう少しなんとかならなかったのか |
| 私がモテないのはどう考えてもお前らが悪い! | No Matter How I Look at It, It's You Guys' Fault I'm Not Popular! | もう少しなんとかならなかったのか |
| 銀魂 | Gintama | これだとジンタマではないのか |
| ゲゲゲの鬼太郎 | GeGeGe no Kitarō | これだとじぇじぇじぇではないのか |
| 魔法先生ネギま! | Negima! Magister Negi Magi | ギはどこから出てきた |
| 魔入りました!入間くん | Welcome to Demon School! Iruma-kun | 英訳不可能なのでしゃあない |
・Re:ゼロから始める異世界生活について、ロゴに記載の英語タイトルは「Re:Life in a different world from zero」に対し、英語タイトルは「Starting Life in Another World」と結構違う。
・葬送のフリーレンの英題「『Frieren: Beyond Journey's End」は、旅の終わりと仲間の喪失の意味がかかっていて良いと思った。
・るろうに剣心の英題「Samurai X」は知っていたのだが、調べた範囲ではどうもアニメのタイトルのようであるので入れてない。
・進撃の巨人の英題「attack on titan」はやや不自然な表現らしい。
https://uo.com/ultima-online-new-legacy/
MMORPG の元祖にして最高峰 Ultima Online に27年目にして新ルールセットの新シャード New Legacy が 2024/10/15 にリリースされたのに日本ではいっさい話題になってなくて悲しい。
ClassicUO というサードパーティークライアントが公式認定され、WebAssembly でなんと Web ブラウザだけで UO 2D が動く。
3DクライアントのようなコンテナやUOAにあったような便利機能が標準搭載。
そんなことより人がいっぱいのブリタニアを懐かしの音楽とともに駆け巡るのがすごい楽しい。
残念ながら New Legacy シャードがあるのがアメリカなのでラグがひどく、言語も英語のみ。 UO がでた当時アメリカのシャードしかなかった頃 Catskills でラグでバウンスしながら、拙い英語で遊んでいた時代を思い出す。まだ始まったばかりなので新ルールセットがどんなものなのか、今後のシナリオもみんな手探り。PK はないのかな？PvP はあるらしい。
