  |
はてなキーワード: fukushimaとは
まーたデマ播いてるな
そもそも福島では事故後に県が放射線被ばく量の測定を妨害したから被曝影響を確定できないだけやね
にもかかわらず、若年の甲状腺がんが多発して論文にもなってるんよね
Individual Dose Response and Radiation Origin of Childhood and Adolescent Thyroid Cancer in Fukushima II: Possibility of High I-131 Exposure as in Chernobyl
https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1360584346300962048
Fukushima: A Nuclear Nightmare 2026年3月10日公開
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aKTmUdQQoZI
原子力は「安全が第一だ」なんてことは皆よく分かってるんだけれども
で、じゃあ安全はどうしたかって言ったら、まぁ結構きちんと、結構じゃなくて、あの、少なくともミニマムはもう言われたことはやってて、だからこそ許可されて運転しているわけですけども。
まぁ、こういう言い方はちょっと俗っぽいかもしれないけれども、安全にはお金がいるんで、やっぱり。それは、あの、そしたら原子力っていうのは民間でやっていいのかいけないのかっていう問題にも発展するわけなんですけども。
あの、まぁいち民間企業でそれだけやっぱきちんと稼ぎながら安全を確保していくっていうような仕組みが、ほんとにキープできるのかって経営者は当然考えるわけで、やっぱりなんとか稼働率も良くしないといけないと。
事故がヒューマンエラーの結果であったかって言ったら、ヒューマンエラーっていいうは違うと思いますね。あの、人間的要素ですね。
福島原子力事故の人間面・組織面の教訓と原子力安全改革の取り組み
事故を防ぐことはできたのか?
日本の都道府県を「知名度順」にリスト化するのは主観的な要素を含むため、完全に客観的な順序を決めるのは難しいですが、一般的な知名度を考慮する際によく使われる基準（観光地、人口、文化的な影響力、メディアでの露出など）をもとに推定してみます。
この話題だけど、IT系のサービス名に限った話ではなく有名なところでアナ雪がFrozenだったりカールじいさんの空飛ぶ家がUpだったり作品タイトルすら全くの一般的な単語が使われている。
実話系だと一般人の人名タイトルなことも多いし、アメリカで起きた飛行機不時着事故を描いた「ハドソン川の奇跡」なんて原題はSully。
日本で「Fukushima 50」が「よっしー」だったら誰が見に行くだろうか。
要するにあちらはそれが普通っぽい。
被りだとか検索性だのググラビリティだのとか気にしてないしそもそも名前にこだわってない。
多分ひらがなカタカナ漢字英語を組み合わせられてやたら表現の幅が広い日本人がこだわりすぎなだけで、世界のほとんどはそんなもんなんじゃないだろうか。
中国語はどうなんだろうね？
Natureにすら疑われてるもんな
全然信用されてない
Is Fukushima wastewater release safe?
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-02057-y
国連演説で世界的な注目を浴びた環境活動家グレタ・トゥンベリさんが、有名な原発推進派のスポークスマン的人物として知られる
ジャーナリストのジョージ・モンビオット氏と環境問題に関する短編ドミュメンタリー映画を共同制作していた事実が注目を集めている。
このモンビット氏はバリバリの原子力推進派として知られ、福島原発の事故直後には、次のような原子力賛成の記事を
英紙ガーディアン誌に寄稿して物議を醸したことで知られている。
Why Fukushima made me stop worrying and love nuclear power
「福島の事故により私は如何にして心配するのを止めて原子力を愛するようになったか」
(George Monbiot The Guardian 2019/3/21)
全文は以下に
またグレタさん自身もIPCC（気候変動に関する政府間パネル）の「原発は脱炭素エネルギーの大いなる解決策」という主張を
ふと気になったので、総務省の選管リンク集 https://www.soumu.go.jp/senkyo/senkyo_s/links/senkan/ から各都道府県の選管のサイトに行って、そこから参院選についてのページを調べてみた。
独自ドメインだったら何だというんだ、という話は以下を参照。
独自ドメインのサイトは総じて力が入っていてそれ自体は良いことだと思うのだけれど、その情報を置くのに相応しい場所はどこか、という点も気にしてほしいと思う。
（以下、リンクが多いせいかうまく投稿できなかったので先頭の h を削っている)
ttps://fukushima-senkyo2022.com/
ttps://202207-chibaken-senkan.jp/
ttps://niigata-saninsen2022.jp/
ttps://2022sangiin-senkyo-aichi.jp/
ttps://hiroshima-sangiinsenkyo2022.com/
ttps://www.yamaguchi-sangiin2022.net/
これらは継続的に利用しているものかもしれないが追えていない。（継続的に利用していれば良い、というものでもないが）
ttps://k-senkyo.com/sangiin
ttps://fukuoka-pref-senkan.com/sangiin/
ttps://www.miyazaki-senkyo.jp/
(ttp://www.pref.kagoshima.jp/kensei/senkyo/26sangi/index.html の「特設サイトはコチラ！」のリンク先が sakura.ne.jp になっていて怪しく見える。アクセスすると上記のページにリダイレクトされる)
まとめは県のサイトにある (ttps://www.pref.aomori.lg.jp/soshiki/senkan/26sangiin.html) けど投開票速報が外部にある (ttps://www.aomori-se1.jp/sangi-koukai/)
総務省の一覧からのリンクは .jp になってるけど現在は lg.jp にあって (ttps://www.pref.akita.lg.jp/pages/genre/15273) リンクが切れてる。
まとめは県のサイトにある (ttps://www.pref.yamanashi.jp/senkyo/r4_26_sangin.html) けど投開票速報が外部にある (ttp://www.yamanashi-senkyo.jp/)
総務省の一覧からのリンクは .jp になってるけど現在は lg.jp (ttps://www.pref.fukui.lg.jp/doc/senkan/index.html) にある。.jp の方もサーバは動いてるようだけど証明書エラーが出る
総務省の一覧からのリンクは .jp になってるけど現在は lg.jp にある (ttps://www.pref.mie.lg.jp/SENKAN/index.htm) ようでリンクが切れてる。
DeepLで翻訳してみた
The main issue...the bid price has been reaching ¥80/kWh every day since the beginning of the year.
I can finally get into what I really want to tell you.
The reason why new power companies have stopped accepting bids or have withdrawn from the business is because the days when this JEPX spot market price reaches 80 yen/kWh have been going on and on since the beginning of 2010.
The electricity market is a market. If there is a surplus of electricity, the bid price goes down, and if there is a shortage of electricity, the bid price goes up. The spot market is a blind single-price auction, which means that once a contract price is determined, all market prices are traded at that price. Even if Masuda-san bids 10 yen, if many people bid 20 yen, it will be 20 yen, and if many people bid 5 yen, it will be 5 yen.
And as I said before, if they fail to purchase, the power retailer has to pay the imbalance fee.
Then what happens? Many people think, "I'm going to buy it at the imbalance fee of 80 yen/kWh anyway, so I'll bid 80 yen for it. Here is the URL of Enexchange's website, which shows the spot market price in an easy-to-understand manner.
https://insight.enechange.jp/markets
For March 31, it's in the 20 yen range. That's bright red. It is cheaper than the 80 yen I mentioned earlier.
Imagine this. TEPCO's Standard S plan is 20~30 yen/kWh. You see, what we sell for 20-30 yen, we have to buy for more than 20 yen, or even 80 yen.
How much is the gross profit on something that sells for 25 yen? 8 yen, 5 yen, 3 yen? Let's assume that 90 out of every 100 jobs generate a gross profit of 5 yen, which is a profit of 450 yen. If 10 out of 100 sell at that price, the profit is 550 yen.
450 - 550 = -100.
This is the impact of a spot market price of 80 yen. Imagine if you had a customer base of tens of thousands of dollars, and you have to blow millions of dollars every day for a month. I think you can understand a little bit of the logic behind the suspension of acceptance and shutdown of business.
Of course, calculating the cost of procuring electricity is not this simple. I mean, I can't write about the inside story of procurement in my business because it would violate confidentiality. I wrote what I could find out just from the spot market, where the amounts are visualized by the general public. I didn't tell the whole story, if you think about it. Sorry. It's a title fraud.
Supplement... why is this happening?
To be honest, even as someone in the new power company, I am troubled by this situation. How did this happen? ......
In essence, I think "don't liberalize the infrastructure in the first place" is right. However, to put some position talk into it, I think that the various things that happened in the aftermath of Fukushima and the licking at the Kashiwazaki nuclear power plant were the result of being lenient because it was infrastructure, and I think there is some nuance to that.
However, I don't think that the designers of the system anticipated this level of instability in the power supply when the system was liberalized in April 2004. I was impressed when the supply-demand crunch warning came out. I was like, "This is it! That rumored ！！！！ Supply and demand crunch alert: ！！！！！！！" I was so excited. There's no way there's going to be rolling blackouts! It's about to happen!
However, in the extreme, retailers are wholesalers, and while they are wholesalers, the products they sell are not all that different. How can you make a difference in a commodity like electricity? It is usually impossible. It's hard to add value to a product because it's all about price. Of course it's not impossible. There are plans, decarbonization, optional services, and so on. But there is no difference in the electricity itself. I think it's possible to point out that the reason why various new electric power companies flocked to the market was because hyenas gathered in the industry that was assured of a sweet deal in infrastructure ......, and that's true for a percentage of the population. I think all electric power companies are looking for ways to add value to electricity.
I hope this case will make the market healthier.
Incidentally, there is a new electric power company that is getting a tailwind from this current situation. Where is it? The answer is after the commercial!
こうして比較してみると、"radioactive water" はどちらかと言えば強い方の表現だなと思った。
contaminated Fukushima water, contaminated water
Japan says it will release more than one million tonnes of contaminated water from the ruined Fukushima nuclear power station back into the sea, in a decision that drew swift condemnation from China, South Korea and environmental groups and is likely to anger the fishing industry.
ttps://www.aljazeera.com/news/2021/4/13/japan-to-release-contaminated-fukushima-water-into-sea
Fukushima radioactive water, contaminated water
Japan to announce Fukushima radioactive water release into sea
Tokyo appears set to formally announce its final decision on the release of contaminated water from its wrecked Fukushima nuclear power plant into the sea.
ttp://www.arirang.com/News/News_View.asp?nSeq=275277
wastewater, contaminated water
Japan has approved a plan to release more than one million tonnes of contaminated water from the destroyed Fukushima nuclear plant into the sea.
ttps://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-56728068
treated Fukushima water, contaminated water
Japan to release treated Fukushima water into the sea: PM Yoshihide Suga
The Japanese government plans to release more than 1 million tonnes of contaminated water from the destroyed Fukushima nuclear plant into the ocean, Prime Minister Yoshihide Suga said on Tuesday (Apr 13), in a controversial decision that follows years of debate.
ttps://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/asia/japan-fukushima-nuclear-plant-water-sea-yoshihide-suga-14610968
Fukushima wastewater, radioactive water
Japan determined to release Fukushima wastewater despite backlash
Japanese Prime Minister Yoshihide Suga said on Monday that the disposal of radioactive water from the crippled Fukushima nuclear power plant cannot be postponed amid plans to rebuild the plant, despite the looming backlash from both home and abroad, broadcaster NHK reported.
ttps://news.cgtn.com/news/2021-04-12/The-plan-to-release-Fukushima-wastewater-sparks-backlash-ZoFTbhBjG0/index.html
treated Fukushima water, treated radioactive water
Japan to start releasing treated Fukushima water into sea in 2 years
Japan will start releasing more than 1 million metric tons of treated radioactive water from its destroyed Fukushima nuclear plant into the ocean in two years, the government said Tuesday -- a plan that faces opposition at home and has raised "grave concern" in neighboring countries.
ttps://edition.cnn.com/2021/04/12/asia/japan-fukushima-water-intl-hnk/index.html
radioactive water
Fukushima: South Korea summons Japan's envoy over dumping decision
The Japanese government has approved a controversial plan to release radioactive water from the wrecked Fukushima nuclear plant into the ocean. South Korea expressed 'strong regret' over the decision.
ttps://www.dw.com/en/fukushima-south-korea-summons-japans-envoy-over-dumping-decision/a-57177353
Japan to dump contaminated water from Fukushima nuclear station into sea
Japan plans to release into the sea more than 1 million tonnes of contaminated water from the destroyed Fukushima nuclear station, the government said on Tuesday.
ttps://www.france24.com/en/asia-pacific/20210413-japan-to-release-contaminated-water-from-fukushima-nuclear-station-into-sea
Japan's Prime Minister Suga Yoshihide says a decision on how to dispose of treated water from the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant should not be put off.
ttps://www3.nhk.or.jp/nhkworld/en/news/20210412_18/
irradiated water, Contaminated wastewater
Japanese government says it WILL release irradiated water from Fukushima nuclear plant into the sea
Contaminated wastewater at the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear plant will be released into the ocean “in around two years,” the Japanese government has announced, despite calls from China and South Korea urging against the move.
ttps://www.rt.com/news/520856-fukushima-contaminated-water-release/
小栗旬『罪の声』
菅田将暉『糸』
■優秀助演男優賞
宇野祥平（『罪の声』）
星野源（『罪の声』）
■優秀助演女優賞
桃井かおり（『一度も撃ってません』）
https://www.oricon.co.jp/news/2182834/full/
鬼滅の刃の主演である花江夏樹や助演の鬼頭明里や日野聡の名前が入ってないのはやっぱおかしくないかの？
どう考えてもワシはこの現状には納得できんのじゃよな。
どのくらい納得できんかというと、大好きだった近所の大福餅屋がコロナ禍で潰れたのと同じくらいじゃの。
興行記録を塗り替えて社会現象にまで発展した作品の役者ですら選ばれないのはさすがに実写偏重すぎるじゃろ。
Four years after the Fukushima accident, TC screening data from the first and second round (up to December 2014) were compared with the Japanese nationwide annual TC incidence, and with the incidence in one area of Fukushima prefecture selected as reference (Tsuda et al., 2016). The authors reported that the observed number of TCs was substantially higher than the expected number based on national and regional incidence data, and concluded that this increase could be attributed to ionizing radiation exposure from the accident. This ecological study has been strongly criticized by scientists around the world because of serious methodology limitations; further, the study conclusions are not supported by the results (Davis, 2016, Jorgensen, 2016, Korblein, 2016, Shibata, 2016, Suzuki, 2016, Takahashi et al., 2016, Takamura, 2016, Wakeford et al., 2016). Limitations of ecological study design are well-known, although the authors did not acknowledge the issue of ecologic fallacy. Another criticism was that the data from the Fukushima screening program are not directly comparable with the cancer registry data from the rest of Japan where systematic advanced ultrasound technology is not used to detect cases. The authors of these criticisms suggested that though the increased TC number could be associated with the exposure from radioactive fallout, a more plausible conclusion would be that the screening program is finding an anticipated increase in TC detection across the Fukushima prefecture. Indeed, Tsuda and colleagues did not consider the latent properties of TC, nor the fact that a prevalent cancer detected by screening might have had first preclinical manifestations of abnormality before the nuclear accident.Thereafter, several researchers have analysed the relationship between radiation exposure (with different estimated exposure levels, mostly using an external dose) and TC prevalence and incidence in residents aged ≤18 years in the Fukushima prefecture at time of the disaster (Kato, 2019, Nakaya et al., 2018, Ohira et al., 2019a, Ohira et al., 2020, Ohira et al., 2019b, Ohira et al., 2016, Ohira et al., 2018, Suzuki et al., 2016, Toki et al., 2020, Yamamoto et al., 2019), but no radiation-related risks have been demonstrated to date.
