Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

NEXT Figma Documentation and Guide #2899

Open
wants to merge 33 commits into
base: next
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

mmailaender
Copy link
Contributor

@mmailaender mmailaender commented Oct 24, 2024

Description

Adjust the Figma Landing page + add Tutorials to the docs to prepare for the v3 launch.

Progress

  • Figma Landing page
  • Tutorials
    • Chapter 1: Set-up the Figma UI Kit
    • Chapter 2: How to use the Figma Plugin

Figma UI Kit for testing: https://discord.com/channels/1003691521280856084/1217864742643957832/1303390206946316310


Updates

  • We've changed the .png images to .webp to have smaller and more performant images while keeping the transparent background to provide some semi-dark/light image support (We will later provide dark and light images, but for now, we're keeping it lean).
  • We're sticking with numbering in the file names, as the files are adjusted individually for the tutorials, and the numbering increases clarity.

The following tutorials are not MVP relevant and will be delivered afterwards:

  • Chapter 3: Wireframes
  • Chapter 4: Component
  • Chapter 5: Colors
  • Chapter 6: Typography
  • Chapter 7: Slots and Properties

Checklist

Please read and apply all contribution requirements.

  • Your branch should be prefixed with: docs/, feature/, chore/, bugfix/
  • Skeleton v3 contributions must target the next branch (NEVER dev or master)
  • Documentation should be updated to describe all relevant changes
  • Run pnpm check in the root of the monorepo
  • Run pnpm format in the root of the monorepo
  • Run pnpm lint in the root of the monorepo
  • Run pnpm test in the root of the monorepo
  • If you modify /package projects, please supply a Changeset

Changsets

View our documentation to learn more about Changesets. To create a Changeset:

  1. Navigate to the root of the monorepo in your terminal
  2. Run pnpm changeset and follow the prompts
  3. Commit and push the changeset before flagging your PR review for review.

Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Oct 24, 2024

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: ccac016

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

Copy link

vercel bot commented Oct 24, 2024

@mmailaender is attempting to deploy a commit to the Skeleton Labs Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Oct 24, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Updated (UTC)
skeleton-docs ❌ Failed (Inspect) Nov 13, 2024 6:43am

@mmailaender
Copy link
Contributor Author

We've changed the .png images to .webp to have smaller and more performant images while keeping the transparent background to provide some semi-dark/light image support (We will later provide dark and light images, but for now, we're keeping it lean).

@mmailaender mmailaender marked this pull request as ready for review November 5, 2024 16:07
@mmailaender
Copy link
Contributor Author

Copy link
Contributor

@endigo9740 endigo9740 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@mmailaender Again this may look like a lot, but it's a lot of little things. If you have any questions about this feedback please let me know here or in Discord.

I have to say, everything is looking great! Tons of information and screenshots is always nice. I'm sure users will really appreciate this!

As each item is completed, hit the "resolve" button below each thread. Or if you don't see that, just leave a comment and let me know when the work is done and I'll resolve each item for you. That'll help keep track of what is or isn't implemented yet.

import ImgTutorial from '@images/get-started/figma/tutorials.webp';

<div class="relative">
<Image src={ImgHero} class="rounded-container" alt="hero" />
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There's a number of images on all three pages that use transparency. My assumption is this is to try to make the adopt a bit of the theme color. Unfortunately I think we may need to change this as it has two major downsides:

  1. The text color contrast is not very accessible. We can't bill the Skeleton as an a11y-friendly library if we don't follow our own rules
  2. Transparency tends to inflate the size of the images.

My suggestion is to go with a fixed/solid background, either pure white or black. That way we can ensure all content within the canvas is legible.

<div class="relative">
<Image src={ImgHero} class="rounded-container" alt="hero" />
<a
class="btn btn-lg preset-filled-primary-500 flex items-center gap-2 whitespace-nowrap absolute top-6 right-6 shadow-lg w-48"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The current standard for CTA (calls to action) throughout the documentation is done using primary-filled (a neutral style button). This is the only exception.

Make sure to account for the change to the images to ensure the button remains visible in both light/dark modes. You may need to hardcode a particular set of styles as a one-off here.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That is interesting. What are your thoughts over having a neutral style button as a CTA?
The CTA is the primary goal what the user should do on the page. In our case it's buying the Figma assets. So having a neutral style button (White and black) leads to no hierarchy differentiation between the CTA and the surrounding content.
Companies that have optimized their CTA color contrast have seen substantial increases in conversion rates:

  • Shopify reported a 12% increase in conversions after adjusting their CTA buttons for higher contrast.
  • HubSpot experienced a 20% boost in user interactions by using bold orange against a white background.
  • Booking.com improved accessibility and conversion rates by 15% through contrasting blue buttons on a white background

Copy link
Contributor

@endigo9740 endigo9740 Nov 13, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Screenshot 2024-11-13 at 9 48 15 AM

It's not an issue of contrast here. It's an issue of assigning meaning. Neutral doesn't mean low contrast. For example, the "Get Started" button is still clearly visible, right? But we reserve color for even more critical items on a level above that. Such as the announcement, various alerts, etc.

It's similar to the comment I made the other day, we can't make every single action on the page the "most important" on the page. Otherwise nothing is important. Instead, think in terms of levels or grades.

  • Most critical items (announcements, alerts, etc) - colored and really catch your eye
  • Positive actions (CTAs) - neutral, but still high contrast
  • Neutral actions - still clearly visible, but not the most attention grabbing

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

From a design perspective we're also trying to keep a cohesive design. We need the Figma section to match the aesthetic of the rest of the app. If we decide to change the aesthetic, we'll do it across the board. Not at a one-off.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@mmailaender mmailaender Nov 13, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I appreciate the structured approach to design coherence across the app and understand the intent behind using neutral styles for positive actions. My main point is that, especially for CTAs driving conversions, a colored primary button has shown to be highly effective in boosting user engagement.

As noted, companies like Shopify, HubSpot, and Booking.com have seen clear conversion improvements with distinct, colored CTAs, rather than neutral styles, helping those actions stand out as a focal point. Since our primary goal on the Figma page is conversion, perhaps it’s worth exploring how a similar approach could benefit us here. Would love to hear your thoughts on this!

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I do believe the Figma page is already fairly unique. Lots of big images, the "buy now" panel looks great, and I don't think anyone will have any trouble locating how to purchase if they are interested. But I'm happy to work with you on that once I have more bandwidth.

I have at least one more cosmetic pass in mind before launch. The homepage especially, which is currently a placeholder. We'll have something much more detailed, much informative and interactive, not unlike the v2 site (but hopefully even better). That can also include an additional call to action pointing at the Figma section.

import ImgPlugin from '@images/get-started/figma/plugin.webp';
import ImgTutorial from '@images/get-started/figma/tutorials.webp';

<div class="relative">
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The first thing I want to know as a user is what this page all about. For example, see the large prominent text on the Layouts page. It would be great to have something like this. A quick suggestion:

"Skeleton Labs has coordinated with professional designers to provide a premium Figma UI Kit. This implements all available Skeleton features and components, while also providing a dedicated theme import feature to help your designers get started quickly."

(feel free to improve as desired)

<ProcessStep step="2">
### Create a New Project

In Figma, go to `Home`¹ and select `All projects` from the left sidebar². On the right side, click `+ Project`³ and name the project `Libraries`⁴.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I feel like we're way overusing the code highlighting, which feels very busy and a bit harder to read. Basically: "if everything is important, nothing is". So I'd suggest trying to strip this down to simpler and more straight forward text. Maybe use italics instead?

Additionally the super/sub text should probably be markup rather than unicode characters. This isn't possible in markdown, but MDX supports HTML, which should enable:

  • <sup></sup>
  • <sub></sub>

Alternatively, I think the small numerals may get lost with certain fonts and font sizes from various themes. Maybe consider rewriting using bulleted lists:

Follow these steps in Figma:

1. Go to the Home icon (top-left).
2. Select the All Projects option from the left sidebar.
3. Select Project from the right-side of the page.
4. Provide your project name in the dialog prompt.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

  1. Highlighted text can be unfamiliar at first, but it's a best practice that we're using to improve cross-reading and teach terms. The given example is 30% highlighted, meaning your brain can save up to almost 70% capacity during cross-reading (Depending on whether you read it the first or second time).

  2. The superscript numbers are on purpose, as they should be a subtle connection to the images. The idea is to preserve natural reading flow without being overly instructive. I would like to gather more feedback from the community and then recycle.


## Import Custom Theme in Project

### Prerequisites:
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Given we're going to have so many chapters and this is meant to be read in a linear fashion, the requisite list feels redundant. If a step is optional, then indicate it plainly upfront. We do this with titles sometimes too so it's visible in the Table of Contents:

1. Do Something
2. Optional: Do Something Else
3. Wrapping up

Copy link
Contributor Author

@mmailaender mmailaender Nov 12, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Most people do not follow orders (except you enforce it which also increases churn) instead they are problem/affect driven. So we're designing our tutorials in a way to reflect that people jumping directly to e.g. chapter 4 without reading the chapters before (Because the headline catches them, or they searched for something specific):

  1. Every chapter has eventually a prerequisite section
  2. only a limited amount of chapters are a hard prerequisite
  3. we have implemented an additional fallback system to cover people who jump directly to e.g. Chapter 4 without reading e.g. Chapter 3.

It will start making a lot more sense with our upcoming tutorials, so stay tuned 🙂

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants