This is the repo for the core of the egglog
engine, which combines the power of equality saturation and Datalog.
For getting started, try out the egglog tutorial!
You also can run egglog in your web browser or check out the documentation.
For a "battery-included" experience, we recommend egglog-experimental. It provides more features through additional egglog
plugins.
If you want to cite egglog
, please use this citation.
The following instructions are for using/developing the core directly.
Install Cargo.
git clone [email protected]:egraphs-good/egglog.git
cargo install --path=egglog
The core can be used in REPL mode with:
cargo run --release
The standard mode processes an input file:
cargo run --release [-f fact-directory] [--to-dot] [--to-svg] [-j --threads <THREADS>] <files.egg>
- The
--to-dot
command will save a graphviz dot file at the end of the program, replacing the.egg
extension with.dot
. - The
--to-svg
, which requires Graphviz to be installed, will save a graphviz svg file at the end of the program, replacing the.egg
extension with.svg
. - Set
RUST_LOG=INFO
to see more logging messages, as we use env-logger defaulting towarn
. - The
-j
option specifies the number of threads to use for parallel execution. The default value is1
, which runs everything in a single thread. Passing0
will use the maximum inferred parallelism available on the current system.
One can also use egglog
as a Rust library by adding the following to your Cargo.toml
:
[dependencies]
egglog = "1.0.0"
See also the Python binding for using egglog
in Python.
Egglog can also be compiled to WebAssembly, see ./wasm-example for more information.
To view documentation in a browser, run cargo doc --open
.
Run cargo test
to run the core egglog
tests.
The community has maintained egglog extensions for IDEs. However, they are outdated at the time of writing.
- @hatoo maintains an egglog-language extension in VS Code (just search for "egglog" in VS Code). (Outdated)
- @segeljakt maintains a Neovim plugin for egglog using tree-sitter. (Outdated)
All PRs use codspeed
to evaluate the performance of a
change against a suite of micro-benchmarks. You should see a "performance
report" from codspeed a few minutes after posting a PR for review. Generally
speaking, PRs should only improve performance or leave it unchanged, though
exceptions are possible when warranted.
To debug performance issues, we recommend looking at the codspeed profiles, or
running your own using
samply,
flamegraph-rs,
cargo-instruments (on MacOS) or
perf
(on Linux). All codspeed benchmarks correspond to named .egg
files,
usually in the tests/
directory. For example, to debug an issue with
extract-vec-bench
, you can run the following commands:
# install samply
cargo install --locked samply
# build a profile build which includes debug symbols
cargo build --profile profiling
# run the egglog file and profile
samply record ./target/profiling/egglog tests/extract-vec-bench.egg
# [optional] run the egglog file without logging or printing messages, which can help reduce the stdout
# when you are profiling extracting a large expression
env RUST_LOG=error samply record ./target/profiling/egglog --no-messages tests/extract-vec-bench.egg
egglog has support to run programs in parallel
via the -j
flag. This support is relatively new and most users just run
egglog single-threaded; the codspeed benchmarks only evaluate single-threaded
performance. However, please take care not to pessimize parallel performance
where possible (e.g. by adding coarse-grained locks).
We use rayon's global thread pool for parallelism, and the number of threads used
is set to 1
by default when egglog's CLI is run. If you use egglog as a library,
you can control the level of parallelism by setting rayon's num_threads
.
We run all of our "examples" as benchmarks in codspeed. These are in CI for every commit in main and for all PRs. It will run the examples with extra instrumentation added so that it can capture a single trace of the CPU interactions (src):
CodSpeed instruments your benchmarks to measure the performance of your code. A benchmark will be run only once and the CPU behavior will be simulated. This ensures that the measurement is as accurate as possible, taking into account not only the instructions executed but also the cache and memory access patterns. The simulation gives us an equivalent of the CPU cycles that includes cache and memory access.
Since many of the shorter running benchmarks have unstable timings due to non deterministic performance (like in the memory allocator), we "ignore" them in codspeed. That way, we still capture their performance, but their timings don't show up in our reports by default.
We use 50ms as our cutoff currently, any benchmarks shorter than that are ignored. This number was selected to try to ignore any benchmarks with have changes > 1% when they haven't been modified. Note that all the ignoring is done manually, so if you add another example that's short, an admin on the codspeed project will need to manually ignore it.