This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62022TA0448
Case T-448/22: Judgment of the General Court of 2 October 2024 – PW v EEAS (Civil service – Contract staff – Refusal to reimburse annual travel expenses for dependent children – Article 8(1) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations – Action for annulment – Act adversely affecting an official – Decision which definitively lays down the position of the administration – Admissibility – Principle of sound administration – Duty to have regard for the welfare of staff)
Case T-448/22: Judgment of the General Court of 2 October 2024 – PW v EEAS (Civil service – Contract staff – Refusal to reimburse annual travel expenses for dependent children – Article 8(1) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations – Action for annulment – Act adversely affecting an official – Decision which definitively lays down the position of the administration – Admissibility – Principle of sound administration – Duty to have regard for the welfare of staff)
Case T-448/22: Judgment of the General Court of 2 October 2024 – PW v EEAS (Civil service – Contract staff – Refusal to reimburse annual travel expenses for dependent children – Article 8(1) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations – Action for annulment – Act adversely affecting an official – Decision which definitively lays down the position of the administration – Admissibility – Principle of sound administration – Duty to have regard for the welfare of staff)
OJ C, C/2024/6931, 25.11.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/6931/oj (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/6931/oj
Official Journal |
EN C series |
C/2024/6931 |
25.11.2024 |
Judgment of the General Court of 2 October 2024 – PW v EEAS
(Case T-448/22) (1)
(Civil service - Contract staff - Refusal to reimburse annual travel expenses for dependent children - Article 8(1) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations - Action for annulment - Act adversely affecting an official - Decision which definitively lays down the position of the administration - Admissibility - Principle of sound administration - Duty to have regard for the welfare of staff)
(C/2024/6931)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: PW (represented by: S. Rodrigues and A. Champetier, lawyers)
Defendant: European External Action Service (EEAS) (represented by: A. Ireland, S. Falek and R. Coesme, acting as Agents)
Re:
By his action under Article 270 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of the implied decision of 30 July 2021 rejecting his request for payment of annual travel expenses for the whole of 2020 as regards his dependent children.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
2. |
Orders the European External Action Service (EEAS) to pay its own costs and half of the costs incurred by PW; |
3. |
Orders PW to pay half of his own costs. |
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/6931/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)