User talk:Tuckerlieberman

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Tuckerlieberman! Thank you for your contributions. I am My name is not dave and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! !dave 21:38, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of coffee for you!

Thanks for what you contributed to photo on a milk carton. You did great research and summarization. Blue Rasberry (talk) 13:47, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Terrorist incidents in Pakistan in 2018 has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Terrorist incidents in Pakistan in 2018. Thanks! Legacypac (talk) 00:53, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reading it. It looks like the new article is passing the review process. I am aware that "Terrorist incidents in Pakistan in 2018" was redirecting to "List of terrorist incidents in Pakistan since 2001," so thank you, also, to whoever submitted the request to delete that redirect so that my actual article "Terrorist incidents in Pakistan in 2018" can be accessed. Tuckerlieberman (talk) 02:15, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Tuckerlieberman. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Tuckerlieberman,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikipedia and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 16:28, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Tuckerlieberman,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 15:36, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Tuckerlieberman,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 20:38, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: History of LGBT rights in the United States (October 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:

Please provide consensus first that the articles can be split off at Talk:LGBT rights in the United States, or link to the appropriate discussion.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:History of LGBT rights in the United States and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:History of LGBT rights in the United States, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 00:06, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tuckerlieberman! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 00:06, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions notice for post-1932 American politics and for gender issues

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in (a) GamerGate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 14:51, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:History of LGBT rights in the United States concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:History of LGBT rights in the United States, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:28, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Coronavirus article

Hi, Tuckerlieberman! Thanks for all your work improving and updating articles about the coronavirus pandemic. I just wanted to comment on one thing I have changed: in the "misinformation" article, where you added the information about a woman who is being called "patient zero" by some conspiracy theorists, I removed her name from the article and revdel'ed it from the history. I know you added this in good faith, but this poor woman is being harassed enough; I certainly don't think we should be reporting her name here on Wikipedia, per WP:BLP as well as compassion. Please let me know if you added her name anywhere else, and I will revdel it there too. Thanks. -- MelanieN (talk) 18:08, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No, I didn't discuss the issue (or her name) in any other article. I wasn't sure whether to add her name. My thought process was that she might actually prefer that her name is used in accurate contexts that squelch the rumor, so that more reasonable material comes up in Google searches and so govt/corporations are called out for not helping her (e.g. the CNN article published her name and suggested that YouTube and the U.S. govt could do more to protect her). And I thought maybe Wikipedia wouldn't trust the info as valid if I didn't use her name. Probably I made the wrong call. Thanks for making a judgment call per Wiki policy and updating the article as needed. -- Tuckerlieberman (talk) 18:18, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:History of LGBT rights in the United States

Hello, Tuckerlieberman. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "History of LGBT rights in the United States".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 19:40, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Trump administration communication during the COVID-19 pandemic, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Walter Reed Hospital. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:25, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Updating J&J's COVID-19 section

Hello Tuckerlieberman I noticed you worked on COVID-19 edits on the Johnson & Johnson article. I have COI with the company and wanted to share some new references you may be interested in. Since I am familiar with the subject and I have COI, If I present the small edits and verifiable secondary sources, would you be open to collaborating? What are your thoughts on this?--Chefmikesf (talk) 22:52, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

References:

Send over the info (i.e. what you think is interesting about these articles, which I haven't read yet) and I shall have a look. I am firstname.lastname at Gmail and there is a contact form on my website (URL on my Wikipedia profile). Tuckerlieberman (talk) 13:02, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Tuckerlieberman, I could send a copy of this message to your email but I prefer to keep all of my correspondences on the Wikipedia ledger. I see your addition said: The trial was paused on 12 October because a volunteer became ill.^[1]

Would you mind adding another sentence stating the company resumed its vaccine trail? For example: On October 23, 2020 the company resumed its phase 3 clinical trial because there was no evidence the vaccine caused the event.^[2]^[3]

Done! - Tuckerlieberman (talk) 01:50, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ Browning, Kellen (2020-10-20). "Drugmaker Halts Vaccine Trial Because of Sick Volunteer". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2020-10-27.
^ "Johnson & Johnson prepares to resume COVID vaccine trial in US". medicalxpress.com. Retrieved 2020-10-27.
^ "AstraZeneca, Johnson & Johnson resume late-stage Covid-19 vaccine trials". NBC News. Retrieved 2020-10-27.

New page - Polymateria

Hi,

My name is Sophie and I am very new to being a Wikipedia user - editing and writing articles. I am contacting you because I saw that you had made changes to the plastic pollution Wikipedia page. I was hoping I could get your help to create a new page for the company I work for, we are developing technology for biodegradable plastic solutions (not oxo-degradation) to help combat plastic pollution and fugitive palstics. As I am currently working at Polymateria, I am unable to create the company Wikipedia page and was hoping you could help me.

If you are happy to help me I can send you the text that I would like to have on the page, external sources included.

Again, as said I am very new to this side of Wikipedia so please do let me know if there is another way I should be trying to make these changes.

Thank you and hope to speak soon, Sophie SophieStromback (talk) 17:29, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User:SophieStromback: Send over a couple sources — here, or you can Gmail them to me (my Wikipedia username @ gmail) — and I'll have a look. - Tuckerlieberman (talk) 17:40, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tuckerlieberman, Thank you for your patience in me getting back to you! I've just put up the page request in my sandbox as well as on my talk page. Any and all feedback would be greatly appreciated! This is the correct way of going about setting up my page request I hope?

Speak soon! :) SophieStromback (talk) 15:41, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I see you've got a conversation on your Talk page with a user who has set up the draft article[1] and who has started thinking through it. Let me know if there's any more I can do. - Tuckerlieberman (talk) 23:07, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:51, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

––𝗙𝗼𝗿𝗺𝗮𝗹𝗗𝘂𝗱𝗲 talk 11:30, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ABC News documentary

Hi Tucker. Thanks so much for your addition of this content. I see that you were in a bit of doubt if that was the right location, and I share your concern. Right now that might be a good location, but looking forward, that content needs a bit of development, so another location might be better. I noticed the "Legacy" section at the end, but am not sure. Maybe a new section, or tweaking of that section title, might resolve this? What do you think? -- Valjean (talk) 18:07, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe "Legacy and later developments"? -- Valjean (talk) 18:16, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Valjean: Yes, "Legacy" (and however that section heading might be amended) might be a better place than "Dossier's veracity and Steele's reputation". Come to think of it, I'm not sure whether the ultimate point of the paragraph is to comment on the legacy of the dossier or to say something about Steele himself (i.e. his "reputation"). It could be rephrased to go either way. A new section would also work fine. If you have an idea, go for it. - Tuckerlieberman (talk) 18:18, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have just added it to Steele's article, and the info that is specific to him can go there. That which is related more to the dossier can still go in the dossier article. -- Valjean (talk) 18:21, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is more content from the interview (a legitimate primary source) and commentary about it from several secondary sources that can be used to develop this. Some may belong in one, the other, or both articles. I was a bit disappointed that a lot of new information wasn't revealed, but c'est la vie. -- Valjean (talk) 18:26, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Valjean Great, thank you for taking care of it. I have not watched the interview itself, and so I don't have lots of up-to-date knowledge on this particular topic, but I would be interested to read more if you have the time to write more. - Tuckerlieberman (talk) 18:35, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Right now it's on Hulu, but will likely appear on other platforms later. -- Valjean (talk) 20:03, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for your recent work; I confess I'm time crunched and not following along too close, but its appreciated. NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 13:42, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Of course, @NewsAndEventsGuy! I am happy to help. — Tuckerlieberman (talk) 14:55, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Let me chime in as well. I too appreciate your work very much. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 08:01, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Very kind, @Valjean. Thank you. — Tuckerlieberman (talk) 00:06, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

invisible hatnotes... reminds me...

Weird that people can't find the hearing info with the hatnote at the very top of the article. Reminds me of one summer I worked at a national park entrance station. It was one of the big parks with millions of visitors so there would be a line of cars at my kiosk forming up by 9am all summer. And after the line formed, every dog-nabbit driver asked the same question "Are the campgrounds full".... nevermind the 20"x30" big red sign I always put up around 9am right next to my head on the side of the window saying CAMPGROUNDS FULL. Oh well. Ok, nostalgia mode off. Thanks for your effort at the articles. NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 23:38, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

:-) Tuckerlieberman (talk) 00:07, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tireless Contributor Barnstar

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		Presented to Tucker Lieberman on July 22, 2022, for your tireless persistence in editing with precision and style, especially Attempts to overturn the 2020 United States presidential election, Timeline of the 2021 United States Capitol attack, United States House Select Committee on the January 6 Attack, Public hearings of the United States House Select Committee on the January 6 Attack, and related topics. You do really good work that is much appreciated! -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 20:39, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wow! It's beautiful! Thank you so much, @Valjean:). — Tuckerlieberman (talk) 20:45, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Editor of the Week

		Editor of the Week
		Your ongoing efforts to improve the encyclopedia have not gone unnoticed: You have been selected as Editor of the Week in recognition of your great contributions! (courtesy of the Wikipedia Editor Retention Project)

User:Buster7 submitted the following nomination for Editor of the Week:

Tuckerlieberman has been editing since December of 2017 and has made almost 4000 edits with a solid 97% of them in mainspace. He shows a focused interest in recent political events in the United States and edits other related subject matter. Creates beneficial working relationships wherever he edits and is especially helpful and open to new editors. A great researcher and considerate editor with valuable and forwarding input during article construction. See United States House Select Committee on the January 6 Attack as an example of his input.

You can copy the following text to your user page to display a user box proclaiming your selection as Editor of the Week:

{{User:UBX/EoTWBox}}

Author

Tuckerlieberman

Editor of the Week
for the week beginning July 24, 2022

Editing since Dec 2017 with 97% of his edits in mainspace. Focusses on American political events and related subject matter. Improves working relationships, especially with new editors. A great researcher and considerate editor with valuable and forwarding input during article construction.

Recognized for

Notable work

United States House Select Committee on the January 6 Attack

Submit a nomination

Thanks again for your efforts! ―Buster7 ☎ 14:49, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, @Buster7! I appreciate the nomination/selection. Not sure if it's final or if I'm supposed to know about it. If not, I know nothing. Tuckerlieberman (talk) 14:58, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That looks very official! It is beautiful. Thank you for thinking of me. @Buster7 Tuckerlieberman (talk) 15:49, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: United States Justice Department investigation into attempts to overturn the 2020 presidential election has been accepted

United States Justice Department investigation into attempts to overturn the 2020 presidential election, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Chess (talk) (please use {{reply to|Chess}} on reply) 19:44, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Content Creativity Barnstar

		The Content Creativity Barnstar
		Tucker, thanks so much for your amazing work. You are improving many articles with well-sourced and constructive improvements. It's time-consuming work that can meet resistance, and you remain civil. Keep up the good work. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 17:09, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

So kind, @Valjean! I appreciate this. A Barnstar! It looks really cool. They seem to be feathers. I'll stay on the lookout for that bird. — Tucker Tuckerlieberman (talk) 20:05, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Epic edit summaries

I recommend you have a read of WP:EDITSUMMARY, especially the word "brief" in the opening sentence. I feel those you are writing at United States House Select Committee on the January 6 Attack are too long, and not really helpful to other editors. HiLo48 (talk) 01:13, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

OK. If my words are unhelpful to you, then leaving a response to your comment will magnify the unhelpfulness to you. I will accept the criticism in silence. Tuckerlieberman (talk) 01:36, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your summaries are more than fine. —Alalch E. 15:52, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the vote of confidence! To be fair to HiLo48, I had been copying/pasting entire sentences from the article into the edit summary to show what changed, and/or writing full sentences to explain my reasoning for changing it. In the past week, I've just been writing sentence fragments saying "thing changed". For whatever reason, that seems to be preferred. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Tuckerlieberman (talk) 14:25, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Peace Dove

Peace is a state of balance and understanding in yourself and between others, where respect is gained by the acceptance of differences, tolerance persists, conflicts are resolved through dialog, peoples rights are respected and their voices are heard, and everyone is at their highest point of serenity without social tension.

Happy Holidays. ―Buster7 ☎ 07:42, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy holidays to you as well! Thank you! Tuckerlieberman (talk) 13:54, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Essay critique

I have created a new essay and would welcome some critique on the talk page there:

User:Valjean/Wikipedia's credibility

Valjean (talk) (PING me) 23:00, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Georgia indictments

Great work on getting through the nineteen defendants in the Georgia case. I suggest linking to Prosecution of Donald Trump in Georgia. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 03:50, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, yeah, we should probably switch out the link. I didn't realize that other article was live. Thanks. Tuckerlieberman (talk) 03:55, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Last night I believe I succeeded in replacing all the 2020 Georgia election investigation links I had made, and now they point to Prosecution of Donald Trump in Georgia, per your suggestion. @ElijahPepe Tuckerlieberman (talk) 15:14, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fulton County Case

I hover over the article Georgia election racketeering prosecution watching as a skilled editor (and other collaborators) create an article of timely importance. I have tried my hand at other Trump articles over the years with very little success or enjoyment. When the trial actually starts and the gloves come out, and new editors arrive with different agendas, I am confident you will maintain your demeanor and even-handedness. Your edit summaries are a lesson in what they are meant for. ―Buster7 ☎ 11:30, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Buster7 Thank you for your thoughtfulness. Doing my best over here—the little I can do, anyway. Tuckerlieberman (talk) 01:29, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Donald Trump in popular culture, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fantasy football.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. Tuckerlieberman (talk) 13:01, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

you gonna restore my edit

about Powell agreeing to testify? soibangla (talk) 16:45, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Soibangla I think it is there? In the table. It is the same for Hall & Powell and probably anyone else who pleads guilty. Tuckerlieberman (talk) 16:58, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Soibangla Probably it's more important for Powell, as you may have been pointing out, as she personally knows Trump, whereas (I imagine) flipping Hall mainly helps flip bigger fish like Powell. Tuckerlieberman (talk) 17:22, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

please do not alter edits based solely on personal writing style. that's all I got on this. soibangla (talk) 02:57, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Election denial movement for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Election denial movement is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Election denial movement until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. rootsmusic (talk) 03:40, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Peter Navarro

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Peter Navarro, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 11:44, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New legal article

I have finished enough of Consciousness of guilt (legal) to go public with it. Further development and improvement will be appreciated. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 19:26, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Trump NY case.

Hello. When you changed the tense of one sentence you missed changing "move" to "moved". In the final sentence of the article, the citation doesn't mention the person, Hasen, the U.S. Supreme Court, or Salon. Maybe it's the wrong citation? Also, I was thinking Salon should be linked, assuming there's a page for them. Seananony (talk) 03:00, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Seananony Yes, you are correct on both counts. Sorry, I must have been tired when I typed those. Thanks for the fact-check.

"could have (but did not) move" was a bad construction I shouldn't have used, as it isn't clear whether "move" should take a "-d." Just now I rearranged the sentence to: "Trump could have moved to allow the jury to convict on the misdemeanor charges as a lesser included offense, but he did not."

Just now I added the Salon ref too. In Salon, Hasen said Trump might go to SCOTUS to "argue that the New York election law that he was prosecuted under to turn the false business records misdemeanors into felonies improperly relied upon alleged federal election law violations." The federal law he's referring to is, I believe, campaign finance law, which is mentioned in the Washington Post ref. Tuckerlieberman (talk) 05:02, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[1] Browning, Kellen (2020-10-20). "Drugmaker Halts Vaccine Trial Because of Sick Volunteer". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2020-10-27.

[2] "Johnson & Johnson prepares to resume COVID vaccine trial in US". medicalxpress.com. Retrieved 2020-10-27.

[3] "AstraZeneca, Johnson & Johnson resume late-stage Covid-19 vaccine trials". NBC News. Retrieved 2020-10-27.

[1]

[2]

[3]