User talk:Mebden

Hello, Mebden, Welcome to Wikipedia!

I hope you like working here and want to continue. Check out the Simplified Ruleset. If you need help on how to name new articles, look at the Guide to layout, and for help on formatting the pages visit the Manual of Style. If you need general help, look at Help and the FAQ, and if you can't find your answer there, check the Village pump (for Wikipedia related questions) or the Reference Desk (for general questions). There's still more help at the Tutorial and the Policy Library. Also, don't forget to visit the Community Portal — if you have any questions, or just want to say hello, feel free to contact me on my Talk Page.

Additional tips:

Here are some extra tips to help you get around Wikipedia:

Always use wikiquette
Write from a neutral point of view
If you want to play around with your new Wiki skills, try the Sandbox.
Click on the Edit button on a page, and look at how other editors did what they did.
You can sign your name using three tildes, like this: ~~~. If you use four, you can add a datestamp too. Always sign comments on Talk pages, never sign Articles.
Always use edit summaries when editing pages.
You might want to add yourself to the New User Log
If your first language isn't English, try Contributing to articles outside your native language
Full details on Wikipedia style can be found in the Manual of Style.

Happy editing!

--May the Force be with you! Shreshth91($ |-| r 3 $ |-| t |-|) 16:24, 7 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Lionel Tarassenko.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Lionel Tarassenko.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. --cohesion★talk 10:02, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

French geographical stubs

Thanks for creating articles describing places in France such as Sajas and Tilh. When you create a short article, it's a good idea to place a stub notice on it. I've done the two above for you. For these articles, a suitable template to add to the bottom is {{france-geo-stub}}. Many thanks, JRawle (Talk) 16:31, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pupillage

Thank you for experimenting with the page Pupillage on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Martinp23 08:34, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Cocoon.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Cocoon.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:21, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sigma-finite measure

I reverted your edits at Sigma-finite measure as they were not right. A sigma finite measure is not necessarily finite. Cheers, Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 02:57, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And please use a edit summary to explain what you change. It is easier for us to read that way. Thanks! Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 02:58, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Style tips

Hi. Thank you for your addition to Cartesian product. And a tip. Per the style manual, one should write

== Abbreviated form ==

instead of

== Abbreviated Form ==

That's just the house style. :) And also, a good idea is to use edit summaries, it helps us understand what you changed. Thanks. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 15:00, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Desk job

A tag has been placed on Desk job, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Owainbut 12:04, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've redirected the page to White-collar worker. I hope you don't mind. (Or, in Wikispeak [see above], "The page has been redirected to White-collar worker. It is hoped that it is not minded.") All the best, <K F> 13:15, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

June 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Sidewalk, was not constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. DarkAudit 15:19, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to Sidewalk. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Thank you. --Wiley 23:29, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pi

Hey there. I know it's been a while since you uploaded PiDigits.png, but I was wondering... Do you still have the exact data points that you used for the graph? I'd like to convert it to SVG to ease future editing. Thanks! tiZom_(2¢) 02:45, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of CUBE

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on CUBE, by GreenJoe (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because CUBE seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting CUBE, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 04:09, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Data for Image:PiDigits.png

Where are the original data you used to plot Image:PiDigits.png? I need them to make an improved vector graphics version. —Keenan Pepper 07:33, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orange Wednesdays

Hi, I noticed your edits to Orange Wednesdays. I'm not sure that the information you provided is entirely correct as OW is not a lottery, instead preference is given to those that have a higher average monthly spend with Orange. RaseaC 19:31, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your reply, while I fully support the whole discussion thing, I don't think it's necessary in this instance: I reckon we can crack this one ourselves. Basically I see it this way:

I can't find a source (reliable or otherwise) to support the 250'000 thing
I can find a reliable source (T&Cs) to support the higher spend theory

I'm not sure that, sourced or otherwise, either of the above are particularly noteworthy and so I for one would suggest just having a link to the Orange Wednesdays website and letting people read the nitty-gritty T&Cs for themselves. RaseaC 12:58, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Syngnathia

Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article Syngnathia, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 17:03, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Headings - capitals

Please avoid using capitals unless necessary - in headings, article titles, and in general. This is based on capitals used in Unweaving the Rainbow (Summary of the Logical Arguments). You may have learned this already, I don't know. Richard001 (talk) 01:18, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lofoten link to Maelström 2000 Canadian movie

Hi, I have left a message at Talk:Lofoten regarding the In popular culture section at Lofoten. --Gerrit ^CUTEDH 12:11, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fields Medalists

Hi, please suggest how to count for that winner. He holds dual citizenship (Vietnamese and French). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.52.136.178 (talk) 17:40, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs: Scatter matrix; McLaren MP4-18; Persécution; The Real Eve; Flakstadøya; Late fee; Felipe de Alençon; Edwin Norris; Variance-gamma distribution; Pointe-aux-Outardes, Quebec; Hossein Saffar Harandi; Pseudo-determinant; Cabozantinib; Handbook of a Christian Knight; Philadelphia Yearly Meeting; HFSS; Laplace no Ma; ~~Generalized inverse Gaussian distribution~~; Never Dreamed You'd Leave in Summer

Cleanup: Think tank; Twisting properties; Correlation function
Merge: Inertia tensor of triangle; Good faith estimate; The Great Betrayal
Add Sources: Seventh-day Adventist independent ministries; Wishart distribution; Multivariate Student distribution
Wikify: Self-Similarity of Network Data Analysis; Information bottleneck method; Coupon collector's problem (generating function approach)
Expand: Luton East (UK Parliament constituency); Zoids; Free Pascal

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 17:52, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:GIG distribution pdf.png

Thank you for uploading File:GIG distribution pdf.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ww2censor (talk) 15:36, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with CMBES

Hello. Concerning your contribution, CMBES, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.cmbes.ca/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=51&Itemid=88. As a copyright violation, CMBES appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. CMBES has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:CMBES and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:CMBES with a link to where we can find that note.
If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:CMBES.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you.

Article is an old creation of November 2006 when copyright rules at Wikipedia were maybe not that strict yet, but it is an almost copy of the mentioned CMBES website page SchreyP ^(messages) 22:58, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:GIG distribution pdf.png missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

File:GIG distribution pdf.png

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:55, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:GIG distribution pdf.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:GIG distribution pdf.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:47, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Aplasia

The article Aplasia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Dictionary article

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rathfelder (talk) 14:23, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Toronto Monthly Meeting

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Toronto Monthly Meeting, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 15:17, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Mebden. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Mebden. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Mebden. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Domtar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page PCB (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:43, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks -- fixed. Mebden (talk) 13:11, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited A. A. MacLeod, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Harry Ward (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:30, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Paraíso Perdido moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Paraíso Perdido, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. b uidhe 15:44, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the tips. I have edited it and will submit for review. Mebden (talk) 20:50, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Paraíso Perdido (February 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Paraíso Perdido and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Paraíso Perdido, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 21:13, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mebden! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 21:13, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society

The article IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable sub-group of notable organisation

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Fayenatic London 14:37, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New message from TwoTwoHello

Hello, Mebden. You have new messages at TwoTwoHello's talk page.
Message added 10:27, 1 June 2020 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

TwoTwoHello (talk) 10:27, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Paraíso Perdido concern

Hi there, I'm MDanielsBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Paraíso Perdido, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. MDanielsBot (talk) 03:02, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Paraíso Perdido concern

Hi there, I'm MDanielsBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Paraíso Perdido, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. MDanielsBot (talk) 01:49, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Paraíso Perdido

Hello, Mebden. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Paraíso Perdido".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 03:44, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:18, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of University of Toronto Institute of Biomedical Engineering for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article University of Toronto Institute of Biomedical Engineering is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/University of Toronto Institute of Biomedical Engineering until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Chess (talk) (please use {{reply to|Chess}} on reply) 20:59, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 2

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Nie Rongzhen

added a link pointing to Langzhou

Qian Xuesen

added a link pointing to Langzhou

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:PiDigits.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:PiDigits.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ✗plicit 05:31, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

Your edit to 2022 Ontario general election has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 12:17, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Are ALS patients "nice"?

Hi there, thanks for your interest in the ALS page - I hope you'll consider reviewing it for good article status! I too have been interested in this topic, but for GA status we need to pretty much only use claims that are backed up in systematic reviews, rather than primary individual studies. I have seen that study before, and several others over the years, about the question. For instance I was perplexed by a psychodynamic study from Italy that used Rorsach tests and essentially blamed patients for having their own disease as a manifestation of their unconscious repressed desires =(

Anecdotally I do worry a bit that any such effect is mostly volunteerism by those who opt to take part in such studies, and also perhaps the limited contact that professionals have with patients. If you only see the doctor once or twice a year and they're going to give you hope and access to treatments then perhaps you put on a brave face for them. But for the last 20 years or so I've spent a long time in online patient communities, and the marked contrast between the "positive stoic" and how people really feel at 2am seems quite significant. I wonder if on some levels we as professionals *want* people to come across a certain way, and so this is also a social expectation bias. About a decadea ago I unexpectedly became a caregiver to a family member with the condition and so got to see it from both sides of the table.

Anyway, if there has been a systematic review on this topic then of course we can go back and add something, I have access to the Wikipedia library if there's anything you can't access. Thanks again, PaulWicks (talk) 06:55, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Paul, I was sorry to read about your family member. Good luck with the GA status, which seems an excellent ambition -- I wish Wikipedia had more GAs! In the criteria I don't see a demand for systematic reviews, which is good because these don't exist for every interesting aspect of the disease! Fortunately, Brain and Behavior is a reputable journal and the article in question seems a useful contribution in this exciting and evolving field.

Thank you for the offer of bringing the library to bear -- perhaps as a next step you might like to include a link or two to findings balancing those of Jane Kullmann et al. Mebden (talk) 12:55, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted for now, off to find a better review on the topic will report back PaulWicks (talk) 20:26, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you in advance for the search, PaulWicks. I've written a placeholder paragraph for now, and if you have thoughts of reverting it may I invite you to instead open a topic on the ALS talk page to gather more input, so we can as a group weigh the benefits of GA status against including notable aspects of a disease? Mebden (talk) 13:18, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, all good plans for naught. Started, then developed multitudinous pet / child issues and got distracted.

Right, so coming back to this. Thank you for the placeholder, it does a nice job of outlining the key arguments. And I wasn't right on my first stab at GA, it doesn't prioritize systematic reviews per se. Where I read that was actually (let's see if I can do this right) WP: No Original Research where it said "Wikipedia articles should be based on reliable, published secondary sources, and to a lesser extent, on tertiary sources and primary sources. Secondary or tertiary sources are needed to establish the topic's notability and avoid novel interpretations of primary sources. All analyses and interpretive or synthetic claims about primary sources must be referenced to a secondary or tertiary source and must not be an original analysis of the primary-source material by Wikipedia editors."

Happy to open up a talk page thread if useful to broaden the discussion but essentially my thinking was:

100's of things have been suggested to cause ALS
The only ones with a "visible to the naked eye" basis are genetic, which is now well described in the article
The plethora of chemicals and traumas and other exposures only roughly increase risk by 50-100% in a rare disease, which is far from a smoking gun
We've got links out to the ones that come up repeatedly in systematic reviews of solid causes, of which personality is not one of them (trust me - I do think it's interesting! - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3793262/)
On a sentence-per-effect size basis in the main article, then we're just using single words for causes with good evidence of weak effect, but ~60 words for a putative cause that does not survive systematic review is unwarranted emphasis.

Perhaps in a sub-page we could go to town blowing out all these causes in more detail (e.g. the sports and military stuff is intriguing) like we've got with Genetics of ALS, but that too needs work and could just be a 5,000 word repeeat of recent reviews.

Sorry, that was long. Too much coffee. PaulWicks (talk) 11:10, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Local pride" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Local pride has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 1 § Local pride until a consensus is reached. Beland (talk) 03:17, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Normative modeling (January 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

This is not the correct place to request new redirects. Please follow the instructions at Article wizard/Redirects. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Normative modeling and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 16:13, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Civil pride

Hello, Mebden. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Civil pride, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:06, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Normative modeling

Hello, Mebden. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Normative modeling, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:06, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Normative modeling

Hello, Mebden. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Normative modeling".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:36, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]