Reliability Considerations of Path-Aware Semantic Addressing
draft-li-6lo-pasa-reliability-04
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Guangpeng Li , David Lou , Luigi Iannone | ||
| Last updated | 2025-03-22 (Latest revision 2024-09-18) | ||
| Replaces | draft-li-nsa-reliability | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
Path-Aware Semantic Address (PASA), proposes to algorithmically assign addresses to nodes in a 6lo environment so to achieve stateless forwarding, hence, allowing to avoid using a routing protocol. PASA is more suitable for stable and static wireline connectivity, in order to avoid renumbering due to topology changes. Even in such kind of scenarios, reliability remains a concern. This memo tackles specifically reliability in PASA deployments, analyzing possible broad solution categories to solve the issue.
Authors
Guangpeng Li
David Lou
Luigi Iannone
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)