Common Industry Challenges

Explore top LinkedIn content from expert professionals.

  • View profile for Alexey Navolokin

    FOLLOW ME for breaking tech news & content • helping usher in tech 2.0 • GM @ AMD • Turning AI, Cloud & Emerging Tech into Revenue

    786,429 followers

    Plastic is highly durable and resistant to decomposition. Most plastics take hundreds to thousands of years to break down, meaning that once produced, they persist in the environment for an extremely long time. What do you think about this initiative in Bali? Marine Pollution: A large proportion of plastic waste ends up in the oceans, where it poses a serious threat to marine life. Animals often mistake plastic for food, leading to ingestion and, in many cases, death. Microplastics, which are tiny plastic particles resulting from the breakdown of larger pieces, can enter the food chain, affecting not just marine species but also humans who consume seafood. Harm to Wildlife: Animals can become entangled in plastic waste, leading to injury or death. For example, plastic rings, nets, and bags are common culprits in the harm and killing of birds, fish, and other wildlife. Toxicity: Some plastics contain harmful chemicals, such as BPA (Bisphenol A) and phthalates, which can leach into the environment and potentially enter the human body, causing health issues. The incineration of plastic waste can also release toxic gases, contributing to air pollution. Carbon Footprint: The production of plastic is energy-intensive, relying heavily on fossil fuels. This contributes to greenhouse gas emissions, exacerbating climate change. How AI Can Help Address the Plastic Issue: Waste Sorting and Recycling: AI can enhance recycling processes by improving the accuracy and efficiency of waste sorting. Machine learning algorithms, combined with robotic systems, can identify and separate different types of plastic from other waste materials, increasing the volume of plastic that gets recycled. Plastic Detection in Oceans: AI-powered drones and satellite imaging can be used to detect plastic waste in oceans. By analyzing images with AI, we can better understand the scale of ocean plastic pollution and target cleanup efforts more effectively. Material Innovation: AI can accelerate the development of alternative, more sustainable materials by analyzing vast datasets of chemical compounds and predicting their properties. This can lead to the creation of biodegradable plastics or entirely new materials that have less environmental impact. Supply Chain Optimization: AI can help companies optimize their supply chains to reduce plastic use. By analyzing data on production, packaging, and transportation, AI can suggest ways to minimize plastic waste and encourage the use of sustainable alternatives. Education and Awareness: AI-driven platforms can be used to educate the public about the impacts of plastic pollution and encourage more sustainable behaviors. Personalized recommendations based on AI analysis can guide consumers to make more environmentally friendly choices, such as choosing products with less plastic packaging. #plastic #ai #technology #innovation via @sungai_design

  • View profile for Guadalupe Lareo

    Copywriter + Producer in progress | 6+ years creating stories for digital media, fiction and communities | Background in project management, content strategy & executive production

    3,813 followers

    Nobody tells you film financing is actually  a stack of different deals. You imagine raising a budget means finding  one investor with a big check. I wish it worked that way. In reality, you rarely raise "the budget." You build a puzzle where every piece comes  from a different source, and every piece  has strings attached. Here are some of the most common ways films  get financed: 1. Presales A distributor pays upfront for release rights in  their territory. That contract can then be used as collateral  for a bank loan. 🟢 Pros: Money arrives early. 🔴 Cons: Those distribution rights are gone permanently. 2. Co-Productions Two or more producers from different countries  combine budgets, talent, and resources. Each partner can unlock funding opportunities  in their own territory. 🟢 Pros: Access to more financing. 🔴 Cons: Shared creative control and complex legal  structures. 3. Government Funds A public body invests directly through grants, soft loans,  or equity participation. 🟢 Pros: This is actual cash, not a tax mechanism. 🔴 Cons: Cultural requirements and, in some cases,  approval rights over elements of the project. 4. Tax Incentives Governments rebate a percentage of qualifying  production spend to attract projects. 🟢 Pros: Real money back. 🔴 Cons: It usually arrives after production,  not when cash flow is tight. 5. Gap Financing A lender advances money against territories that  haven't been sold yet. If presales cover 70% of the budget, a gap  lender may finance part of the remaining 30%. 🟢 Pros: Helps close the final financing gap. 🔴 Cons: It's usually the most expensive money in the  capital stack, often carrying interest rates of 8–15%. The key is to look at your project and ask:  Where does it fit? Sometimes it's the subject matter that makes it  eligible for a fund. Sometimes it's shooting in a location with strong  tax incentives. Sometimes it's finding the right co-production partner. Every film is a different puzzle. The job isn't finding one source of money. It's figuring out which pieces your project can  realistically unlock, and how they fit together. ♻️ Find this interesting? Repost for your network.   📌 Follow for more insights that spark big ideas.

  • View profile for Dr. Ambika H D

    CEO & Founder at ProAlgaeTech/Algae Expert/Algae technical advisor/ Algae consultant /

    18,550 followers

    𝗙𝗿𝗼𝗺 𝗟𝗮𝗯 𝘁𝗼 𝗜𝗻𝗱𝘂𝘀𝘁𝗿𝘆 - 𝗪𝗵𝘆 𝗦𝗰𝗮𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗠𝗶𝗰𝗿𝗼𝗮𝗹𝗴𝗮𝗲 𝗶𝘀 𝗡𝗼𝘁 𝗘𝗮𝘀𝘆 Microalgae are often called "green gold" because of their many uses - biofuels, food, feed, wastewater treatment, carbon capture, and even pharmaceuticals. They grow fast, use little land, and produce valuable compounds. But taking them from a controlled lab to a large, industrial scale is much harder than it looks. 𝙎𝙤𝙢𝙚 𝙠𝙚𝙮 𝙘𝙝𝙖𝙡𝙡𝙚𝙣𝙜𝙚𝙨: 📍Strains under stress - Algae that grow well in the lab often fail outdoors, where light, temperature, CO₂, and pH keep changing. 📍Contamination risks - Bacteria, fungi, and other algae can quickly spoil cultures, even in closed systems. 📍Scaling photobioreactors - Bigger reactors do not always mean better; light and gas exchange become inefficient. 📍High harvesting costs - Separating algae from water can eat up 20–30% of total costs. 📍Water and nutrient demand - A huge amount of water and nutrients are needed for each kilogram of algae biomass. 📍Product quality - Keeping a consistent protein, lipid, or pigment profile is difficult at scale. 📍Regulation and markets - Food and feed approvals are slow, costly, and vary by country. 📍Economics - Current production costs are high, which limits use to only high-value products. 📍Energy balance - The energy needed for aeration, mixing, and harvesting can sometimes exceed the energy value of the final product. Public perception and awareness - Many end-users still see algae as “unfamiliar” or “risky,” slowing consumer acceptance and market growth. 𝘽𝙪𝙩 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙖𝙧𝙚 𝙖𝙡𝙨𝙤 𝙘𝙡𝙚𝙖𝙧 𝙨𝙤𝙡𝙪𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣𝙨 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙨𝙩𝙧𝙖𝙩𝙚𝙜𝙞𝙚𝙨: 👉Use local or adapted strains that can handle outdoor stress. 👉Apply modular photobioreactors instead of oversized ones. 👉Develop low-cost harvesting methods like bio-flocculation. 👉Recycle nutrients and water through wastewater integration. 👉Use AI and automation for real-time monitoring and process control. 👉Build biorefineries that make multiple products from the same algae. 👉Work with regulators to simplify approvals for safe, known strains. At Proalgaetech, we focus exactly on this - helping clients bridge the gap from research to reliable industry. Our expertise includes strain selection, scalable PBR design Lgem | synalgae, contamination control, wastewater-based nutrient recycling, and regulatory guidance. The promise of algae is big, but success depends on solving these practical challenges step by step. With the right design and partnerships, microalgae can become a true pillar of the circular bioeconomy. Let us connect if you are exploring algae for food, feed, water, or carbon solutions. #Innovation #Technology #Management #DigitalMarketing #Future #Microalgae #SustainableTech #WastewaterTreatment #Bioeconomy #AlgaeInnovation #CarbonCapture #FoodTech #CircularEconomy #Biotech #ProAlgaeTech

  • View profile for Cesar Barbosa

    The next frontier of solar energy isn’t installing the next 100 gigawatts. It’s rescuing the first 100.

    14,115 followers

    A bold prediction no one wants to hear: Half of all commercial solar systems installed before 2016 will be underperforming or non-operational by 2030. The solar industry is obsessed with the future. Cutting-edge panels (bigger is better). Sleek batteries. Dazzling projections for new installs. But here's the reality we can't afford to ignore: a silent crisis unfolding on rooftops across America—a crisis I've been tackling firsthand since 2012, traveling the country with SunPower to address some of the industry’s most pressing system failures. Across the country, tens of thousands of rooftop solar systems—once hailed as the clean energy revolution—are quietly decaying. Not because the technology failed, but because the industry did. We rushed to install. We cut corners. We promised 25 years of performance… and delivered systems that can’t make it past 10. Here’s what’s killing them: Inverters are dying—many are already out of warranty, with no replacements available. Wiring and electrical infrastructure that was never designed for 25+ years of exposure. Install quality? Forget it—an army of barely trained crews built the boom, and now we’re paying the price. Maintenance? There was no plan. Just a contract, a handshake, and a hope it would all work out. This is not just an engineering issue—it's a financial one. Underperforming assets are generating less revenue than forecasted, while increasing the risk of electrical faults, fire hazards, and insurance claims. And here's the kicker: almost no one is ready to deal with this wave of system failures. Asset managers, facility owners, and even EPCs are discovering that repowering, remediation, or decommissioning is far more complex and expensive than expected. This is where the next frontier of solar energy lies—not in installing the next 100GW—it’s rescuing the first 100GW. Revitalization. Repowering. Responsible end-of-life planning. The question isn’t whether it’s coming. It’s whether we have the guts to face it. Are we going to keep pitching the dream— —or finally clean up the mess we left behind?

  • View profile for Dr. Alexander Fleischanderl

    Chief Technology Officer & Head of Green Steel

    10,612 followers

    Take a moment to watch this video — a historic glimpse of workers drawing and quenching #coke from a coke oven, a process that’s fuelled steelmaking for over a century. The stunning lack of PPE aside, it’s a powerful reminder of the ingenuity that built our modern world — and the legacy that we now need to transform. Today, metallurgical coal and coke remain vital to steel, with demand holding steady in the near term, especially as India and Southeast Asia drive growth. Yet, on a net-zero scenario, emissions from steel will have to come down by around 90% in 2050 — clearly incompatible with today's trajectory for metallurgical coal. It’s not a quick switch — cost and scale are tough nuts to crack — but the shift is inevitable. Getting there will require three elements: a massive scale-up of new technologies like hydrogen-based direct-reduced iron (#DRI), retrofitting existing assets with carbon capture, and pushing #electrification as well as material and process efficiency to the limit. Achieving this transformation isn’t just about technical breakthroughs— industry will need stable policy frameworks, robust financing mechanisms, and major infrastructure investments (from clean power grids to hydrogen pipelines) to enable steelmakers worldwide to move from pilot projects to full-scale deployment.

  • View profile for Gideon van Dijk

    CEO @ Chargetrip - Helping drivers find their next charge stop

    3,984 followers

    CPOs must address low utilization to find funding. More infrastructure isn’t the answer, owning the charging and driving experience is. For years, they have followed the same playbook: • Buy land • build stations • wait for volume to grow The assumption was straightforward: secure prime locations now, and as EV adoption increases, those stations will become essential. But here's where we are today: • Utilization rates are averaging 17%, meaning most chargers sit empty most of the time. • Investors are looking for more than just infrastructure expansion—they want to see sustainable business models. • Variable pricing only increases demand if drivers find those stations in the first place. You increase utilization by guiding more drivers to your station of choice. I know, #KnowledgeBomb. But you probably don't know that this isn't magic; it's just a result of owning the driving and charging experience through preferential EV routing. Today, Chargetrip drives 30GWh of energy demand to stations monthly, and EMSPs and CPOs benefit. Drivers make charging decisions before they start driving. So that's where you capture potential charging sessions. Think about how other industries operate: • Hotels don't wait for guests to stumble upon them, they optimize bookings through search and distribution. • Airports actively attract flights by negotiating routes and offering incentives. • Gas stations don't rely on location alone, they use branding, loyalty programs, and pricing strategies to drive traffic. EV charging needs to do the same. Drivers don't pick stations at random. Their choices are shaped by a search process that considers: • Price • availability • reliability • location and amenities And all of that happens before they even start driving. The real opportunity isn't in waiting for drivers to show up - it's in routing them to your network before they make a decision. CPOs who integrate routing into their strategy won't have to depend on utilization improving over time. They can actively steer demand to their stations, ensuring consistent revenue and higher asset efficiency.

  • View profile for Rahul Mathur
    Rahul Mathur Rahul Mathur is an Influencer

    Pre-Seed Investor @DeVC || Prev: Founder @Verak (acq. by ID)

    128,344 followers

    I spent my entire childhood living with my grandparents - I’ve seen my mom make a few key career decisions based on being able to stay close to them. Last week, my grandfather took one wrong medicine which almost resulted in hospitalization. I wasn’t around to help sadly (fortunately nothing went wrong). This incident reminded me that my main motivation to move back to India was to help my mom with taking care of my grandparents. This is a luxury which < 1% of the country can afford. But, I’ve always thought - what about the rest? How do we build scalable & affordable solutions for the elderly? ➡ For many people - it is not possible to find employment in a city / township where their parents are & for many, work requires you to be overseas - far away from family. India has traditionally been a joint family structure - but we’re increasingly become a nuclear family structure in metro & Tier 1 cities. And, as lifespans increase, old age care becomes even more critical. India is slowly seeing the emergence of “AgeTech” companies i.e. startups which are building products, services & communities tailored to our senior & super senior citizens. The few approaches I’ve seen in AgeTech are: (a) 🤗 Companionship - Goodfellows India (b) 📲 Digital assistance, financial services & reminders - GenWise (c) 🤝 Community / membership club - Khyaal These approaches are interesting - they aim to solve for key age related challenges - lack of companionship, inability to do chores, poor memory etc. ➡ However, one segment where India really needs to catch up in is fully managed residence & assisted living. The “retirement home” concept has yet to catch steam in India. In USA, this is a $100bn annual spend market. 💡 India has a few operators such as Ashiana Housing and Columbia Pacific Communities (US based) - the latter entered India in 2017. But, the total capacity is probably < 100,000 couples. For many families, taking care of their elderly at home may not be a feasible option (domestic help wages at on the rise, children may be overseas etc). In such a case - retirement home & assisted living communities are a huge benefit. These communities provide 360* support for elderly couples: Food, community activities, safe living, medical check-ups, spirituality, timely medication etc. Plus, they give peace of mind to loved ones. While there are some cultural nuances which may make it hard for retirement homes to pick up in India. Broadly speaking, we will need many more such assisted living communities in the next 2-3 decades. #india

  • View profile for Christoph Aeschlimann
    Christoph Aeschlimann Christoph Aeschlimann is an Influencer

    CEO @ Swisscom | Engineer turned CEO of a 24,000-person ICT company. I share weekly posts on leadership, AI, and the messy reality of reinventing established businesses.

    45,359 followers

    The Telecom Industry in Transformation: Reflecting on three key challenges: Digitalisation and evolving consumer needs are transforming many sectors, with the telecom industry being no exception. In response to this dynamic landscape, I would like to share three technology challenges the telco industry must engage with over the coming years:   1) EMBRACING THE CLOUD: The development of cloud-native services for telecom functions such as voice and data is a huge challenge. This involves refactoring our traditional network hardware and monolithic telephony systems, moving everything into the cloud, and changing to devops working models. The payoff? Flexibility, faster service updates, resiliance, and the facilitation of personalised interaction options for our clients. Yet, we must overcome many transformation hurdles. The implementation of virtualisation and automation technologies requires a complete update of our network architecture, new product versions from our vendors, as well as a lot of skill and competency changes for our employees.   2) NAVIGATING THE AI WAVE The advent of #GenAI provides the telecom industry with an array of tools and services. AI can enhance efficiency across numerous areas from chatbots, AI-assisted call center agents, hyper-personalized marketing strategies, to optimized network maintenance. However, beyond efficiency, AI also holds the potential to introduce innovative services benefiting the end customer. Trust, privacy, and transparent handling of customer data are key to the acceptance of these new features.   3) ENSURING TRUST AND SECURITY The potentially most significant challenge ahead is maintaining robust security and customer trust. With hundredthousands of cyber attacks per month on our own Swisscom infrastructure and projected global damage from cyberattacks reaching USD 10 trillion per annum by 2025, security is paramount. In the future, trust-based innovation will be the competitive edge for telecoms and IT service providers. Earning trust is an ongoing, hard-pressed task that cannot be simply bought or created through marketing campaigns.   Achieving these challenges will require one crucial element - our employees. Developing the right skill set and a supportive corporate culture is key to handling such transformative pressures.   What challenges do you see for the telecom industry? How are these mirrored in your field? Looking forward to hearing your thoughts. Swisscom #TelecomIndustry #Transformation #CloudTechnology #CyberSecurity #InnovatorsOfTrust 

  • View profile for Jan Rosenow
    Jan Rosenow Jan Rosenow is an Influencer

    Professor of Energy and Climate Policy at Oxford University │ Senior Associate at Cambridge University │ World Bank Consultant │ Board Member │ LinkedIn Top Voice │ FEI │ FRSA

    122,913 followers

    NEW RESEARCH: Europe won’t regain competitiveness by chasing lower energy prices alone. It will do so by using energy better. In our new paper published today in PLOS Climate, we show that energy efficiency is not a marginal issue but a core structural driver of competitiveness. It directly supports decarbonisation, strengthens energy security, and improves productivity across the economy. Without the efficiency gains achieved since 2000, industrial energy demand today would be almost 40% higher. And cost-effective energy efficiency measures could reduce EU industrial energy demand by another quarter by 2030. Competitiveness is ultimately about productivity and efficient use of resources, not just prices — and energy efficiency sits at the heart of that. Many thanks to my co-authors Barbara Schlomann, Wolfgang Eichhammer, and Nils Borg for an excellent collaboration. Full paper here: https://lnkd.in/efTeVvHc

Explore categories