Alice & Bob’s Post

🔐 Anthropic just used Mythos, its internal AI model, to find a real weakness in HAWK, one of NIST's post-quantum signature candidates. Before you read too much into that, nothing needs patching today. HAWK is still just a candidate, not something anyone has deployed, so no real-world system is affected. 📰 On one front, AI is stress-testing cybersecurity better than expected. On another, quantum research keeps finding more capable algorithms to break cryptographic protocols, with some brilliant minds in that space (Craig Gidney, André Schrottenloher, Élie Gouzien, André Chailloux, among others). Finding schemes that survive all this testing is really the whole point, and this week's news is a good example. 🧮 Here's the gist: HAWK's security depends on a hard lattice problem, and the new attack spotted specific patterns in that lattice nobody had exploited before, letting you search for the secret key a lot faster. 🧰 The bigger takeaway for us is that Anthropic built CryptanalysisBench, a benchmark for evaluating how capable AI models are at breaking classical ciphers. At Alice & Bob, we're building the same kind of tool for quantum, to test if cryptographic schemes actually hold up against quantum computers before anyone relies on them. ✅ Our take is that this is the standardization process working exactly as it's supposed to. HAWK survived two rounds of expert review and still got caught out, this time by an AI model in about 60 hours. Good news, not bad, since the same tools finding these weaknesses can help the field get to solid, quantum-resistant standards faster, and with a lot more confidence. 🔗 Article in discussion: https://lnkd.in/dv3-fm8c #Cryptography #QuantumComputing #NIST #HAWK #AISecurity #Cryptanalysis

  • graphical user interface

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore content categories