![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
siderea2025 Jun 7 11:40 am: benjalvarez1 on Twitter:
WATCH THIS: https://x.com/BenjAlvarez1/status/1931375699786334704
Click through to see the video. You really, really should. Sound is irrelevant.
Text: "Tanks, fighting vehicles and howitzers arrive in Washington, D.C. ahead of next week's military parade. They departed from Texas on June 2." Two minutes and forty seconds.
Allegedly that train is a mile long and is transporting:
• 28 Abrams tanks (M1A2 main battle tank)
• 3 armored recovery vehicles (M88)
• 28 Bradleys (M2A3 infantry fighting vehicle)
• 5 Paladins (M109A7 self-propelled howitzer), and
• 28 Strykers (infantry carrier vehicle)
Source: 2025 Jun 6: @USAMilitaryChannel on YT [not official military channel]: "1-Mile Military Train -Texas to D.C. with Tanks, Armor, and More for Army's 250th Parade". I do not know if that source is reputable or if that inventory is accurate.
USA Today is reporting that "The military vehicles will be joined by 1,800 soldiers". (Source: 2025 Jun 6, USATODAY on YT: "Watch: Tanks, fighting vehicles head to DC for Trump's military parade", CW: face full of Trump, alt: screenshot).
I dunno, maybe it's just me, but I'm thinking that maybe the guy who attempted one coup already bringing a well-armed military force into our capitol city and, crucially, within artillery-range of the Pentagon, is just throwing himself a birthday party, but also maybe not.
ETA: For those of you confused by this, thinking, but doesn't he already control the military? You might want to watch this video about the rise of Xi Jinping.
Now, obviously, Trump would never play a long game like Xi did. But, 1) there are other ways to achieve the same end and 2) he doesn't have to, because his buddies, the Dominionists, did.
benjalvarez1 on Twitter: WATCH THIS: https://x.com/BenjAlvarez1/status/1931375699786334704
Click through to see the video. You really, really should. Sound is irrelevant.
Text: "Tanks, fighting vehicles and howitzers arrive in Washington, D.C. ahead of next week's military parade. They departed from Texas on June 2." Two minutes and forty seconds.
Allegedly that train is a mile long and is transporting:
• 28 Abrams tanks (M1A2 main battle tank)
• 3 armored recovery vehicles (M88)
• 28 Bradleys (M2A3 infantry fighting vehicle)
• 5 Paladins (M109A7 self-propelled howitzer), and
• 28 Strykers (infantry carrier vehicle)
Source: 2025 Jun 6: @USAMilitaryChannel on YT [not official military channel]: "1-Mile Military Train -Texas to D.C. with Tanks, Armor, and More for Army's 250th Parade". I do not know if that source is reputable or if that inventory is accurate.
USA Today is reporting that "The military vehicles will be joined by 1,800 soldiers". (Source: 2025 Jun 6, USATODAY on YT: "Watch: Tanks, fighting vehicles head to DC for Trump's military parade", CW: face full of Trump, alt: screenshot).
I dunno, maybe it's just me, but I'm thinking that maybe the guy who attempted one coup already bringing a well-armed military force into our capitol city and, crucially, within artillery-range of the Pentagon, is just throwing himself a birthday party, but also maybe not.
ETA: For those of you confused by this, thinking, but doesn't he already control the military? You might want to watch this video about the rise of Xi Jinping.
Now, obviously, Trump would never play a long game like Xi did. But, 1) there are other ways to achieve the same end and 2) he doesn't have to, because his buddies, the Dominionists, did.
(no subject)
Date: 2025-06-08 09:48 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2025-06-08 09:55 pm (UTC)> Except Trump would go totally stir-crazy stuck in DC surrounded by the military, unable to spend millions of our bucks to get to one of his golf courses.
Why do you think DC being under military occupation would prevent Trump from going where he pleases?
(no subject)
Date: 2025-06-08 10:57 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2025-06-08 11:24 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2025-06-08 01:17 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2025-06-08 03:16 pm (UTC)https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/how-trump-finally-got-the-military-parade-he-always-wanted/ar-AA1Gh2Ca
Then, of course, Trump happened.
(no subject)
Date: 2025-06-08 03:51 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2025-06-08 09:44 pm (UTC)You're conflating "the military" with "the current leadership of the military", and the latter can be replaced. Right now, one of the biggest obstacles to Trump and the Heritage Foundation ghouls doing whatever the hell they want to us is the fact the upper echelon of the US's officer corps is not going to let themselves be used to overthrow the Constitution. So from Trump's perspective, they need to go, and be replaced by loyalists.
One way to do this is to have a loyalist battalion of tanks roll up on the Pentagon lawn and order them to come out with their hands up. What would they do? Well, for rapid response in case of terrorism, the Pentagon calls up the US Air Force to scramble some fighter jets.
The same US Air Force that has been subject to a concerted infiltration project by the Dominionists for literal decades.
Trump still has widespread support among the enlisted soldiers – and among certain kinds of officers. He's demonstrated a willingness – even preference – to promote very junior, unqualified loyalists into positions of power. There are abundant service members who would be delighted to serve him in this capacity.
(no subject)
Date: 2025-06-09 11:43 pm (UTC)Researcher Risa Brooks posted an informative Bluesky thread that we might find also relevant to this question. She starts:
and the thread includes:
(no subject)
Date: 2025-06-08 07:37 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2025-06-08 07:48 pm (UTC)serious question because I'm not keeping up with all the details of US politics: does he not have enough executive power (in practice even if not in theory) that he can do what he wants even without military coups?
I would have thought that from his point of view right now a military coup was something that he wanted to avoid having done against him.
(no subject)
Date: 2025-06-08 09:49 pm (UTC)> I would have thought that from his point of view right now a military coup was something that he wanted to avoid having done against him.
Correct! And what is the number one way to prevent one?
(no subject)
Date: 2025-06-08 10:24 pm (UTC)I meant, can he not replace whoever he likes at the Pentagon with his friends even without sending troops in?
(no subject)
Date: 2025-06-08 10:34 pm (UTC)Also, I met General Abrams one day when I visited Dad at the Pentagon.
(no subject)
Date: 2025-06-10 03:36 am (UTC)Holy shit. That is an awful lot of firepower for a grudge-driven autocrat to have ready to hand.