siderea: (Default)
[personal profile] siderea
2025 Mar 6: Jezebel: "MAGA Turns on Amy Coney Barrett for Siding With Starving Children" (by Kylie Cheung):
Appealing to the consciences of conservative Supreme Court justices isn’t going to save us in the even more unhinged era of Trump 2.0. But even a broken clock is right twice a day—and on Wednesday, conservative Supreme Court Justices Amy Coney Barrett and John Roberts sided with the three liberal justices to reject the Trump administration’s plea to withhold billions of dollars in foreign aid. And now, all hell is breaking loose in MAGA world.

In February, District Judge Amir Ali ruled that the Trump administration must pay the $2 billion in lifesaving foreign aid already promised under existing USAID contracts, issuing a February 26 deadline. [...] The Trump administration appealed Ali’s ruling to the Supreme Court, which paused Ali’s deadline to review Trump’s arguments. Then, on Wednesday, in a 5-4 ruling, the Supreme Court determined that the Trump administration must comply with Ali’s ruling, directing the district judge to issue clear instructions on Trump’s obligations and the timing for his administration to disburse the aid.

[...] Trump supporters are now displeased with the two treacherous conservative justices, and their ire has fallen particularly hard on Coney Barrett. This is probably because Trump appointed her, but the specific lines of attack from MAGA influencers suggest all the typical right-wing misogyny is also at play here.

“Amy Coney Barrett was a DEI appointee,” white nationalist influencer Laura Loomer tweeted on Wednesday, alongside a photo of Coney Barrett and her family, including her adoptive children who are Black. The racist subtext couldn’t have been more obvious, given everything we know about Loomer’s rabidly bigoted beliefs.

Mike Cernovich, the far-right Pizzagate conspiracy theorist and alleged sexual assailant, wrote of Coney Barrett, “She is evil, chosen solely because she checked identity politics boxes. Another DEI hire. It always ends badly.” [...]

[...] fellow viral MAGA star Jack Posobiec [is] now attacking Coney Barrett with cartoonishly sexist labels by referring to her as a “DEI hire."

Another far-right influencer, Paul A. Szypula, called Barrett’s decision to side with the liberal justices “disgraceful.” He also called her “a bad SCOTUS nominee.” Charlie Kirk replied, “Looking that way.”

[...] Coney Barrett overturned Roe v. Wade and nearly all of her rulings have made our lives immeasurably worse over the last five years. I guess, at least this one time, she and Roberts decided to draw the line at the U.S. violating existing foreign aid contracts to appease the bored, right-wing tech billionaire currently amusing himself by destroying our government.

(no subject)

Date: 2025-03-08 08:19 am (UTC)
conuly: (Default)
From: [personal profile] conuly
The one good thing about the present timeline is that it sure gives me a lot of reasons to eat popcorn.

(no subject)

Date: 2025-03-08 03:34 pm (UTC)
elusis: (Default)
From: [personal profile] elusis
Mmmm, popcorn.

(no subject)

Date: 2025-03-08 02:42 pm (UTC)
dewline: Text - "On the DEWLine" (Default)
From: [personal profile] dewline
She's starting to make the correct enemies.

We'll see how well she manages this situation.

(no subject)

Date: 2025-03-09 09:33 am (UTC)
cvirtue: CV in front of museum (Default)
From: [personal profile] cvirtue
"This is probably because Trump appointed her, but the specific lines of attack from MAGA influencers suggest all the typical right-wing misogyny is also at play here."

This seems likely to be wrong.

I believe the first issue is the misogyny itself, and the "reasons" are to shore up a position they know is foul.

(no subject)

Date: 2025-03-09 02:36 pm (UTC)
cvirtue: CV in front of museum (Default)
From: [personal profile] cvirtue
Yeah.

"some of my best friends are women!"

(no subject)

Date: 2025-03-10 01:05 pm (UTC)
hudebnik: (Default)
From: [personal profile] hudebnik
Note that Barrett wrote a "concurring opinion" in the Presidential-immunity case last year: she agreed that Presidents are immune from criminal prosecution for their "official" acts, but she was the only member of the majority who described any hypothetical examples of "unofficial" acts for which a President would not be immune. And I think she disagreed on the majority's finding that a President's "official" acts cannot be admitted as evidence in other cases.

About

Artisanal wisdom prepared by hand in small batches from only the finest, locally sourced, organic insights.

Not homogenized • Superlative clarity • Excellently thought provoking

Telling you things you didn't know you knew & pointing out things that you didn't know that you didn't know since at least 2004.

January 2026

S M T W T F S
    1 23
45 678910
11 12 1314 15 1617
18192021222324
25262728293031