siderea: (The Charmer)
[personal profile] siderea
Serious questions here.

"Classical liberal", libertarian and libertarian-leaning conservatives often complain about "government regulations" thwarting small businesses. And sometimes big businesses. That's... kind of like a core principle for them, often pontificated about.

Okay.

Can anybody point me at any examples of US conservatives/libertarians working towards the elimination of any government regulation in the last 20 years? Ideally successfully, but any effort of all is interesting.

To be very clear: things that don't count, include:

• Working to elect politicians who claim to be anti-regulations. You have to point at an actual bill or law or executive order or actual documented action they took.

• Working to reduce the power of government to make new regulations. That's something else. I'm looking for efforts to roll back extant regulations.

• Working to reduce government payouts or authority for things that aren't regulations, i.e. social support programs.

• Working to reduce the efficacy of regulation-enforcing bodies by starving them of resources or breaking stikes or otherwise indirectly attempting to allow more people/businesses to get away with breaking the law, as opposed to changing the law.

• Working to privatize government functions.

I'm looking for examples – the more, the merrier –of US conservatives/libertarians actually attempting to eliminate specific regulations from the law since 1995.

Why do I ask?

Two things. The second is that I hit up Wikipedia's page on Deregulation, and the US subsection has a subsubsection "Deregulation 1970-2000". There it stops. The only two items on its timeline in the last 20 years are Telecommunications Act PL 104-104 (1996) and Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act PL 106-102 (1999).

So, according to Wikipedia, basically conservatives stopped actually doing anything about regulation of industry about two decades ago. It sure seems like there are voters alive today who have never seen a conservative work towards removing regulations of any sort.

The first is yesterday's SCOTUS decision. The majority decision, which clipped the wings of a state licensure board for violating antitrust law, was written by Kennedy for himself, Roberts, Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor and Kagan.

Dissenting were Alito, Scalia, and Thomas.

Okay, there's a zeroth thing: I'm watching regulation do things in health care which are... not what I think any of us really want. But if I wanted to find a party or faction working to do something about that, where would I go? It sure looks like the laissez-faire right has gotten way into restraint of trade by regulations – not a huge surprise in that those candidates and organizations who present themselves as "pro-business" usually mean "bigger businesses over smaller ones", and the cleverest way to do that is multiply regulatory burden: larger businesses have the economics of scale to afford the wages of specialists to work to satisfy regulations which smaller businesses can't.

(no subject)

Date: 2015-02-26 09:23 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nancylebov.livejournal.com
What I'm thinking is that not working to oppose excessive regulation (I've seen libertarians complain about people who braid hair having to get full hair-dressers' licenses) is an example of libertarians neglecting to do practical work which would further their goals. Branden did talk about that sort of neglect.

About

Artisanal wisdom prepared by hand in small batches from only the finest, locally sourced, organic insights.

Not homogenized • Superlative clarity • Excellently thought provoking

Telling you things you didn't know you knew & pointing out things that you didn't know that you didn't know since at least 2004.

January 2026

S M T W T F S
    1 23
45 678910
11 12 1314 15 16 17
1819 202122 2324
25262728293031