I probably should have explained a little more in my last post about sending queries and the different kinds of synopses you need to include, so since I'm supposed to be editing right now, I figure now is as good a time as any to do that. :D
The Query: I'm pretty sure I've yet to meet an author that actually
likes writing queries. So if the idea of doing this freaks you the fuck out, don't worry. You're in good company. First, let's start with a blog post I wrote a couple of months ago about writing queries and query summaries:
http://erato-glbt.blogspot.com/2012/02/how-to-write-awesome-query-letter.htmlGo on. I'll wait.
Okay. So now we know what a query is, and that the summary should be short, sweet, and to the point. Think 1-2 paragraphs; just enough time to explain primary characters, conflicts, and resolution. That will give an acquiring editor a clear picture of genre, length, and in general reasonable expectations for your work.
BTW, always mention the length and genre at some point in your query. There should be little mystery at this point, because mystery frustrates busy people, and frustrated editors don't often feel generously inclined.
This is just a quick and dirty explanation about queries, but if you have more questions, ask away. Ask
ldyghst -- I totally don't bite. (I'd say you should ask
juice817, but she might tell you how crazy I am, and that's just counter-productive).
Now, for the rest.
The Summary:When a publisher requests a summary in addition to your query, what they want is an in-depth summary of your story. 1-3 pages, depending on the length of the manuscript, giving a sketched outline of what you're proposing the publisher buy from you. The same Dos and Don'ts from above apply here as well, and especially don't assume the editor is living in your head. If your story involves inter-planetary travel and your characters go from the City of Joe to the Planet of Bob, please actually indicate which is a city and which is a planet, etc (otherwise, it's like being given driving directions using nothing but landmarks from a town you've never been in).
Not all editors read your complete summary until after they've read your excerpt. I, on the other hand, read the summary first. Why? Because I want to know if you can tell me what your story is about. I want to know if
you know what your plot is, because that tells me more about your writing than you'd think.
What you don't want in a summary is any sort of dialogue. At all. A summary tells me who your main characters are (and who is important to them), what they want, why they can't have it, what they do to get it, and if they get it in the end.
Yes. Give away the ending. Again, mystery is a bad thing. The idea behind the summary is to make me go, "I want to see this executed. Gimme."
Summaries are a bitch to write, I know. It's probably one of the most common points of bonding among writers, in fact. But they're a necessary evil. Sorry.
I tried to keep this short, so if I left anything out that you want to know about, let me know. Cool?