Skip to main content
Chinese Medical Journal logoLink to Chinese Medical Journal
. 2024 Apr 12;137(10):1140–1150. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000003111

Dawn of CAR-T cell therapy in autoimmune diseases

Yuxin Liu 1,2, Minghao Dong 1,2, Yunhui Chu 1,2, Luoqi Zhou 1,2, Yunfan You 1,2, Xiaowei Pang 1,2, Sheng Yang 1,2, Luyang Zhang 1,2, Lian Chen 1,2, Lifang Zhu 1,2, Jun Xiao 1,2, Wei Wang 1,2, Chuan Qin 1,2,, Daishi Tian 1,2,
Editor: Ting Gao
PMCID: PMC11101238  PMID: 38613216

Abstract

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy has achieved remarkable success in the treatment of hematological malignancies. Based on the immunomodulatory capability of CAR-T cells, efforts have turned toward exploring their potential in treating autoimmune diseases. Bibliometric analysis of 210 records from 128 academic journals published by 372 institutions in 40 countries/regions indicates a growing number of publications on CAR-T therapy for autoimmune diseases, covering a range of subtypes such as systemic lupus erythematosus, multiple sclerosis, among others. CAR-T therapy holds promise in mitigating several shortcomings, including the indiscriminate suppression of the immune system by traditional immunosuppressants, and non-sustaining therapeutic levels of monoclonal antibodies due to inherent pharmacokinetic constraints. By persisting and proliferating in vivo, CAR-T cells can offer a tailored and precise therapeutics. This paper reviewed preclinical experiments and clinical trials involving CAR-T and CAR-related therapies in various autoimmune diseases, incorporating innovations well-studied in the field of hematological tumors, aiming to explore a safe and effective therapeutic option for relapsed/refractory autoimmune diseases.

Keywords: CAR-T cell therapy, Autoimmune disease, Immunotherapy, Multiple sclerosis, Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder, Systemic lupus erythematosus

Introduction

By reprogramming T cells to express chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) on their surface, CAR-T cells can harness the power of the self-immune system to fight malignant tumors in a non-major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-restricted manner, which has heralded a paradigm in cancer immunotherapy. Current research has primarily focused on CAR-T cells for the treatment of B-cell hematologic malignancies such as acute B-cell leukemia, B-cell lymphoma, and multiple myeloma (MM), demonstrating remarkable efficacy, sustained persistence, and the potential of drug-free remission. Clinical trials have reported that anti-cluster of differentiation (CD) 19 CAR-T cells achieved complete remission in up to 87.5% of patients with refractory/relapsed (R/R) B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, with durable responses extending to 16 months.[1] Similarly, anti-B cell maturation antigen (BCMA) CAR-T cells achieved a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 11.8 months in patients with R/R MM.[2] Additionally, based upon clinical trials and historical data, CAR-T therapy has been recommended as a second-line treatment within one year of the initial therapy for large B-cell lymphoma, alternative therapeutic approach to autologous stem cell transplantation.[3] This strategy is also exhibiting potential in solid tumors.[4]

The triumph of CAR-T cell therapy in eradicating pathological B cells and achieving sustained remissions has propelled researchers to explore its potential application in autoimmune diseases, such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), multiple sclerosis (MS), pemphigus vulgaris (PV), etc., which are characterized by autoreactive B cells and diverse autoantibodies [Figure 1]. Conventional therapeutic modalities for autoimmune diseases include glucocorticoids, immunosuppressants, and monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). Glucocorticoids and immunosuppressants broadly suppress the immune system, leading to increased susceptibility to opportunistic infections, while mAbs provide targeted interventions. For example, the CD20-targeted mAb rituximab can selectively eliminate CD20+ B cells and alleviate SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) score by at least 2 units.[5] The tumor necrosis factor α-targeted mAb infliximab can achieve nearly twofold remission proportions of patients with Crohn’s disease compared to placebo.[6] Tocilizumab, an interleukin 6-targeted mAb, has been found to induce remission in 27% of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients based on the disease activity score using 28 joint counts, compared to a mere 0.8% in the placebo group.[7] Despite these advantages, a proportion of patients respond poorly,[8] the need for repeated administrations compromises compliance, human anti-chimeric antibody that is produced against mAb has been proven to decrease clinical response or result in possible infusion reactions,[9] and mAbs representing foreign antigenic materials may elicit host immune responses.[10]

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Pathogenesis of autoimmune diseases. Autoimmune disease is caused by a self-immune response against the own components, resulting in systemic or organ damage. Ach: Acetylcholine; AchR: Acetylcholine receptor; ACPA: Anticitrullinated protein antibody; AQP-4: Aquaporin 4; ASS: Antisynthetase syndrome; BBB: Blood–brain barrier; cCOII: Citrullinated type 2 collagen; dsDNA: Double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid; Dsg: Desmoglein; IBD: Inflammatory bowel disease; IgG: Immunoglobulin G; LRP4: Low density lipoprotein receptor 4; MG: Myasthenia gravis; MMN: Multifocal motor neuropathy; MS: Multiple sclerosis; MuSK: Muscle tyrosine kinase; NMOSD: Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder; PV: Pemphigus vulgaris; RA: Rheumatoid arthritis; RNP: Ribonucleoprotein; SLE: Systemic lupus erythematosus; Sm: Smith; SS: Sjőgren’s syndrome; SSA: SS A antigen; SSB: SS B antigen; T1DM: Type 1 diabetes mellitus; tRNA: Transfer ribonucleic acid.

To date, a therapeutic strategy that achieves drug-free remission in autoimmune diseases remains elusive, making CAR therapy an enticing avenue. Compared to existing treatments, CAR-T cells hold promise in treating precisely due to their treat-to-target strategy, persistently due to their ability to self-expand in vivo [Supplementary Figure 1, http://links.lww.com/CM9/B986]. This paper reviewed preclinical and clinical studies of CAR-T and CAR-related therapies for autoimmune diseases, assessing their therapeutic efficacy, safety profiles, persistence, and the feasibility of clinical application. It also presents approaches to advance CAR-T therapy, with the aim of optimizing its application in autoimmune diseases.

Bibliometric Analysis of CAR-Related Therapy

VosViewer (version 1.6.19, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands) and CiteSpace (version 6.1.R6, Drexel University, Philadelphia, USA) were used to conduct the visualized bibliometric analysis of the academic publications in the field of CAR-related therapy retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection (WOSCC) on September 25, 2023. Totally, 22,468 papers were retrieved and analyzed. Figure 2A portrays the annual progression of publications and growth rate from 1996 to 2023. It illustrates a steady escalation over these years, gaining momentum since 2017. This upsurge can be attributed to the initial clinical approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for anti-CD19 CAR-T therapy in treating R/R B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia and non-Hodgkin lymphoma, marking a turning point in the field. Keyword co-occurrence was also analyzed to identify research hotspots and trends. By consolidating related terms such as “chimeric antigen receptor” and “chimeric antigen receptors”, as well as “immunotherapy” and “adoptive immunotherapy”, a top 15 keywords ranking list was generated [Table 1]. The overlay visualization of keyword co-occurrence showed the color shift from purple to yellow over time, illustrating the transition of CAR-related therapy from bench to bedside [Figure 2B]. Additionally, “adoptive immunotherapy” held the highest frequency, underlining its significance in the landscape. Since CAR-T is used as an immunotherapy for specific elimination of pathogenic B cells or plasma cells in B-cell hematological malignancies, which also involves the mechanisms of autoimmune disease pathogenesis, we extended exploration to the intersection between CAR-related therapies and autoimmune diseases, searching the WOSCC database and obtaining a total of 210 records. Among these documentations, 40 countries and 372 institutions have participated in promoting this technology. University of Pennsylvania was the most productive institution. Gerhard Krönke, Dimitrios Mougiakakos, and Georg Schett, who are from the same institution, were the most productive authors. Frontiers in Immunology was the most productive journal, while Journal of Immunology was the most cited journal. Figure 2C illustrates that despite limited publications, the overall trend indicates an increase by years, particularly robust in the period of 2019–2020. This surge can be attributed to an impactful animal experiment in 2019 that successfully employed anti-CD19 CAR-T cells to mitigate SLE, laying the groundwork for accelerated development.[11] Then, through keyword co-occurrence analysis, we summarized top five keywords about autoimmune disease types [Supplementary Table 1 and Figure 2D, http://links.lww.com/CM9/B986]. Aside from “autoimmune diseases”, the most frequent keywords included MS, SLE, RA, and experimental autoimmune encephalitis (EAE), which points to the broad application of CAR-related therapy. Furthermore, through reference co-citation analysis, we identified top eight references with the strongest citation bursts [Supplementary Figure 2, http://links.lww.com/CM9/B986]. The article (Strength: 6.78) with the strongest citation burst was Ellebrecht et al’s[12] animal experiment published in Science in 2016, demonstrating promising efficacy of chimeric autoantibody receptor (CAAR)-T cells targeting desmoglein-3 (Dsg3) for treating PV. Among these references, four papers (50%) are still in a state of citation burst, including Kansal et al’s[11] animal experiment on anti-CD19 CAR-T cells treating murine with lupus, Noyan et al’s[13] research on anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) CAR-regulatory T (Treg) cells for treating organ transplantation rejection, a case report of anti-CD19 CAR-T cells treating refractory SLE conducted by Mougiakakos et al[14] and a review article by June and Sadelain[15] discussing CAR therapy. As citation bursts refer to the sudden increase of citations of the paper, these top eight references are about emerging topics in the field of CAR-related therapy for treating autoimmune diseases, with the aforementioned four papers representing the latest research directions. To conclude, we conducted an extensive bibliometric analysis highlighting the expected growth in attention toward CAR-related therapies and their application in autoimmune diseases. In the ensuing section, we provide a comprehensive overview of preclinical and clinical research on CAR-related therapies for different autoimmune diseases [Supplementary Tables 2 and 3, http://links.lww.com/CM9/B986].

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Bibliometric analysis of CAR-related therapy and its application in autoimmune diseases. (A) The publications about CAR-related therapy are escalating; (B) Keywords co-occurrence overlay of CAR related therapy; (C) The publications about CAR-related therapy treating autoimmune diseases show an increase; (D) Keywords co-occurrence overlay of CAR-related therapy treating autoimmune diseases. CAR: Chimeric antigen receptor.

Table 1.

The top 15 keywords of CAR-related therapy.

Rank Keywords Count Centrality
1 Adoptive immunotherapy* 5123 0.28
2 Chimeric antigen receptor 2909 0.12
3 Therapy 2418 0.09
4 Expression 2085 0.06
5 T cells 1934 0.06
6 Cancer 1402 0.06
7 Lymphocytes 1310 0.03
8 Antitumor activity 1147 0.05
9 Activation 1090 0.03
10 Dendritic cells 1055 0.06
11 Natural killer cells 946 0.04
12 In vivo 911 0.02
13 Acute lymphoblastic leukemia 877 0.05
14 B cell 792 0.02
15 CAR T cells 763 0.01

*“Immunotherapy” is merged with “Adoptive immunotherapy”. “Chimeric antigen receptors” is merged with “Chimeric antigen receptor”. CAR: Chimeric antigen receptor.

CAR-T Therapy in Autoimmune Diseases

SLE

SLE is a systemic autoimmune disorder characterized by the presence of various autoantibodies that form immune complexes, which flow in the bloodstream and deposit in tissues to activate the complement system and recruit cytokines, ultimately inducing systemic damage.[16] Current treatments include glucocorticoids, immunosuppressants, and belimumab, but they often fall short in achieving drug-free remission. To address this, anti-CD19 CAR-T cell therapy has been proposed as a potential treatment. In animal studies, anti-CD19 CAR-T therapy showed promising results in alleviating lupus manifestations. Mice treated with anti-CD19 CAR-T cells exhibited reductions in plasma antibodies and improvements in longevity, proteinuria, splenomegaly, and skin damage. The CAR-T cells demonstrated sustained viability and functionality over time.[11] Another study compared anti-CD19 CAR-T cells with a mAb and found that CAR-T cells cleared more CD19+ B cells and prolonged the lifespan of mice.[17] CAR-natural killer (NK) cells, another type of cellular therapy, also showed potential in treating SLE. Anti-programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) CAR-NK92 cells can recognize and kill follicular helper T cells characterized by elevated PD-1 expression on the surface, consequently reducing memory B cells proliferation and differentiation, immunoglobulin secretion, as well as ameliorating splenomegaly.[18] In summary, both CAR-T and CAR-NK cell therapies demonstrated efficacy in alleviating SLE manifestations in animal models, priming the ground for promising clinical trials.

In a pioneering clinical trial, autologous anti-CD19 CAR-T cells were administered to a patient with severe/refractory SLE who had failed to respond to other treatments. The therapy resulted in the depletion of circulating B cells, decreased antibody levels, and improvements in proteinuria and SLEDAI scores.[14] The same team then extended their investigation to five patients with refractory SLE, infusing 1 × 106/kg anti-CD19 CAR-T cells. The results indicated that anti-CD19 CAR-T therapy was well tolerated and could induce rapid remission in severe refractory SLE.[19] Besides, infusion of anti-CD19/BCMA CAR-T cells exhibited double benefits in a female with SLE and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.[20] To date, 20 clinical trials of CAR-T therapy treating R/R SLE are underway, employing anti-CD19/BCMA CAR-T cells or anti-CD19 CAR-T cells [Supplementary Table 3, http://links.lww.com/CM9/B986]. In conclusion, both animal and clinical trials highlight the potential of CAR-T therapy for R/R SLE, but long-term, large-scale clinical trials are imperative to firmly establish its efficacy and safety.

RA

RA is an autoimmune disorder that affects joints and connective tissues (e.g., blood vessel, lung), significantly diminishes patients’ quality of life, with an approximately 4-fold increase in the incidence in woman vs. man.[21] In order to develop precise and radical remedies for RA, researchers are focused on targeting the anticitrullinated protein antibody, which is responsible for causing damage to multiple organs by binding to citrullinated residues within self-proteins (e.g., vimentin, α-enolase, fibronectin, fibrinogen, type II collagen, etc.).[22] One study by Zhang et al[23] involved the development of CAR-T cells that specifically targeted overreactive B cells, guided by citrullinated type II collagen (COII) and fluorescein isothiocyanate. In the presence of antigenic peptides, these CAR-T cells demonstrated proficiency in eliminating hybridoma cells generated through antigenic peptide immunization, alongside B cells from mice with COII-induced arthritis and RA patients. Notably, the CAR-T cells showed minimal off-target effects in killing macrophages, monocytes, and dendritic cells that express FcγR. Another approach involved the use of HLA-DR1-based CAR-T incorporating COII into its molecular architecture to target pathogenic CD4+ T cells that recognize RA-related autoantigens presented by HLA-DR alleles. In vitro, anti-DR1-COII CAR-T cells recognized and depleted CD4+ T cells; in COII-induced mice, these CAR-T cells significantly reduced the incidence, delayed the onset, and mitigated the severity of arthritis. Additionally, serologic markers such as autoantibodies and T cell proliferative responses were markedly reduced.[24] In summary, preclinical studies have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of CAR-T therapy for RA. However, the translation to clinical trials is essential to validate the feasibility of CAR-T therapy in human settings, encompassing considerations of safety, efficacy, durability, and cost-effectiveness.[25]

Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM)

T1DM, also known as insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, usually begins in childhood or adolescence. Due to autoantibodies such as glutamic acid decarboxylase antibodies and islet cell antibodies attacking pancreatic β cells, there is an absolute insulin deficiency, rendering blood glucose levels more volatile than in type II diabetes mellitus. Long-term insulin therapy is necessary for T1DM management, but patient adherence can be challenging. CAR-T therapy has emerged as a potential cure for T1DM by addressing this issue. In one study conducted by Zhang et al[26], they utilized the specific targeting ability of mAb287, which binds to the I-Ag7-B:9-23(R3) complex, to delay or prevent T1DM onset in non-obese diabetes (NOD) mice. They designed anti-mAb287 CAR-T cells, which could both kill antigen-presenting cells expressing this complex in vitro, and significantly delay the onset of hyperglycemia in mouse models of T1DM. However, over time CAR-T cells became progressively exhausted, there was no discernible difference in T1DM incidence among groups by week 30. On the other hand, another study explored the use of 5MCAR-T cells with five structure modules, which demonstrated lasting effects for up to 1 year in vivo. These CAR-T cells prevented T1DM onset, attenuated islet inflammatory response, and alleviated symptoms by specifically recognizing and eliminating CD4+ T cells expressing the BDC 2.5 T cell receptor.[27] In addition to CAR-T cells, researchers have investigated CAR-Tregs for T1DM. For instance, anti-HPi2 (clone HIC1-2B4.2B) CAR-Tregs demonstrated functional activity, however, their rapid exhaustion due to the multiple expression of HPi2 on all CD4+ T cells created a constant activation signal that hindered sustained in vivo function.[28] Similarly, insulin-specific CAR-Tregs lasted up to 4 months in vivo but failed to prevent T1DM development.[29] Additionally, tetraspanin 7, a membrane protein highly expressed on the surface of pancreatic β cells, was found to be inadequate recognized by CARs.[30] These setbacks may stem from inappropriate target antigens. Continued research endeavors are indispensable to refine and optimize these approaches, ensuring a tailored and effective therapeutic strategy for T1DM.

MS

MS is an autoimmune-mediated inflammatory demyelinating disease of the central nervous system (CNS). The primary targets of the autoimmune attack are myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) and myelin basic protein (MBP).[31] Currently, studies exploring CAR-T therapy for MS largely rely on preclinical investigations using EAE mouse models.[32] Fransson et al[33] initially designed anti-MOG CAR-Tregs for EAE, demonstrating significant in vitro immunosuppressive effects. In vivo, these cells successfully reversed the disease state and prevented relapse. Moreover, the overall astrocyte proliferation and myelin production were more vigorous in the anti-MOG CAR-Treg treatment group, suggesting a broader influence. Similarly, another preclinical study showed that anti-MOG/MBP CAR-Tregs alleviated EAE disease scores and delayed disease progression.[34] In addition to the immune-regulatory effects of CAR-Tregs, anti-CD19 CAR-T cells have also promise in ameliorating EAE by targeting B cells, which contribute to autoantibody production. Gupta et al[35] reported that anti-CD19 CAR-T cells significantly reduced EAE scores, delayed disease onset, and maintained the absence of CD19+ B cells for over 25 weeks, surpassing the efficacy of CD20 antibodies. However, contrasting findings were observed in another experiment where injection of anti-CD19 CAR-T cells resulted in a worsened form of EAE after 2 weeks, with a broader range of pathological demyelination and axonal loss, despite helping clear meningeal B-cell deposits implicated in the immunopathology of MS.[36] This may be attributed to the diverse autoimmune mechanisms involved in EAE. As for the CNS autoimmune diseases such as EAE, what makes CAR-related therapy outperform mAbs is its ability to migrate to the CNS to exert therapeutic effects. For example, B cells were thoroughly depleted in the periphery and within the CNS by anti-CD19 CAR-T cells, indirectly proving their penetration into the CNS.[35] And anti-MOG CAR-Treg cells were also shown to localize in the soma of several brain structures such as whiter matter of cerebellum and relieve EAE score.[33] This characteristic of CAR-T cells makes them favorable candidates for the treatment of CNS autoimmune diseases, while the differing experimental outcomes necessitate comprehensive animal studies to underscore CAR therapy’s efficacy and safety profile in MS.

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD)

NMOSD is a group of autoimmune-mediated CNS primary inflammatory demyelinating diseases that mainly involve the optic nerves and the spinal cord, with autoantibodies targeting aquaporin (AQP)-4. Binding of AQP4-IgG produced by plasma cells to AQP4 on the surface of astrocytes recruits granulocytes and activates the complement system,[37] resulting in optic nerve and spinal cord injury. Qin et al[38] used anti-BCMA CAR-T cells in treating R/R AQP4-IgG-positive NMOSD. The primary outcome was safety, which was mainly reflected in hematologic toxicity, including leukopenia (100%), neutropenia (100%), anemia (50%), and thrombocytopenia (25%), and cytokine release syndrome (CRS) (grades 1–2). Notably, grade 3 and higher infections occurred mainly in patients over 60 years old with long-standing autoimmune dysfunction and use of immunosuppressants for more than 20 years. In terms of clinical manifestations, 11 (92%) patients achieved drug-free remission during a median follow-up period of 5.5 months, and showed varying degrees of improvement in scales, vision, ambulation, and voluntary urination and defecation; and serologic markers such as AQP4-IgG was also reduced, affirming anti-BCMA CAR-T cells’ efficacy and safety for AQP4-IgG-positive NMOSD patients. Moreover, the role of AQP4-IgG suggests the feasibility of constructing anti-AQP4 CAAR-T cells, specifically eliminating autoantibody-producing plasma cells, which aligns with the precise treat-to-target goal.

Myasthenia gravis (MG)

MG is an autoimmune disease caused by neuromuscular junction synaptic lesions.[39] It mainly manifests as morbid fatigue of the affected muscles, with severe cases impinging on respiratory muscles, leading to dyspnea. Current treatments for MG include cholinesterase inhibitors, immunosuppressants, and glucocorticoids. However, there are still a subset of patients showing resistance to these modalities. As a result, precise immunotherapy is emerging as a promising approach for MG treatment. For example, anti-muscle tyrosine kinase (MuSK) CAAR-T cells have been designed and have shown specific cytotoxicity against anti-MuSK B cell receptor (BCR)-expressing B cell in preclinical studies,[40] laying the groundwork for the clinical application of CAR therapy for MG. Apart from targeting autoantibodies like MuSK, anti-BCMA CAR-T cells also hold the potential for MG treatment. Recently, CAR-T cells engineered with RNA (rCAR-T) targeting BCMA were used to treat 14 patients with generalized MG. Remarkably, these rCAR-T cells displayed significant reductions in MG severity scales for up to 9 months of follow-up, with no observed adverse reactions such as dose-limiting toxicity, CRS or neurotoxicity. The use of temporary and non-replicable mRNA in these CAR-T cells reduces signal amplification, leading to decreased side effects and enabling outpatient infusions.[41] Currently, there are four ongoing clinical trials of CAR-T cell therapy targeting BCMA and CD19, as well as CAAR-T cell therapy targeting MuSK for MG treatment [Supplementary Table 3, http://links.lww.com/CM9/B986].

PV

PV is an autoimmune skin disorder, characterized by IgG that attacks desmoglein-1 (Dsg1) and Dsg3 depositing at the surface of keratinocytes.[42] Treating PV with glucocorticoids presents challenges, including increased infection risk and relapse after drug withdrawal.[43] To address these challenges, Ellebrecht et al[12] engineered anti-Dsg3 CAAR-T cells to specifically eliminate self-reactive B cells. This experiment verified that these cells can recognize and kill anti-Dsg B cells in vitro, as well as significantly improve gross and serologic performance in vivo. Notably, anti-Dsg3 CAAR-Ts demonstrated efficacy akin to anti-CD19 CAR-T cells in eliminating CD19+ Nalm-6 B cells expressing anti-Dsg3 BCRs from PV patients. Furthermore, the presence of anti-Dsg antibody in the blood of patients was simulated, proving that the antibody does not neutralize, but rather bolsters the efficacy and persistence of CAAR-T. Another experiment demonstrated that anti-Dsg3 CAAR-T cells can decrease serum and tissue-bound autoantibodies and target cell burden.[44] Overall, the preclinical findings strongly support the efficacy of CAAR-T cell therapy for PV. Accordingly, a phase I clinical trial of anti-Dsg3 CAAR-T cell therapy for mucosa-dominated PV is currently underway [Supplementary Table 3, http://links.lww.com/CM9/B986].

Other autoimmune diseases

In addition to these well-studied autoimmune diseases, CAR-T therapy is being expanded to diverse conditions.

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)

IBD includes Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis, which are both autoimmune disorders occurring in genetically predisposed populations in the presence of environmental triggers such as smoking and unhealthy diet.[45] Elinav et al[46] engineered anti-TNP CAR-Tregs using 2,4,6-trinitrophenol (TNP) as the target antigen in a mouse model of ulcerative colitis. Administering CAR-Tregs before or after the induction of ulcerative colitis could both improve the survival of mice. Another experiment improved the lentiviral transduction technique and reached a similar conclusion.[47] Apart from TNP, flagellin derived from Escherichia coli H18 (FliC) can also be utilized as target antigen. Accordingly, Boardman et al[48] devised anti-FliC CAR Tregs and demonstrated promising suppressive capability, suggesting the initial success of CAR-Treg therapy for IBD.

Sjögren’s syndrome (SS)

Characterized by dry mouth and eyes, severe SS can affect multiple systems without a current cure. Since anti-La/Sjögren’s syndrome B antigen (SSB) autoantibodies have been shown to be one of the serological hallmarks of SS, Meng et al[49] engineered anti-LaA CAAR-NK92MI cells, in which LaA is one of the key epitopes of autoantigens La/SSB. Promisingly, anti-LaA CAAR-NK92MI cells demonstrated specific cytotoxicity against anti-LaA antibody-positive SS patient blood samples.

Antisynthetase syndrome (ASS)

ASS is a severe subtype of idiopathic inflammatory myopathy mediated by anti-synthetase antibodies attacking cytoplasmic aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases involved in protein synthesis.[50] B cell depletion has shown promise in controlling disease progression and achieving radically cure ASS, which is initially verified by three case reports utilizing anti-CD19 CAR-T cells to treat patients with severe/refractory ASS. After CAR-T infusion, clinical manifestations and serologic markers of the three patients were all improved.[5153]

Multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN)

MMN is considered to be mediated by autoimmunity and characterized by progressive asymmetric weakness.[54] A case report demonstrated symptomatic and serologic improvement of MMN in a 53-year-old patient with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and coexisting refractory MMN after CAR-T treatment. Although the patient experienced severe adverse reactions, including grade 4 immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) and grade 2 CRS, the report still raised great potentials of CAR-T cells in depleting autoreactive B cells.[55]

Necrotizing crescentic glomerulonephritis (NCGN)

NCGN induced by anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibody (ANCA) is an autoimmune disease that lacks efficient treatment regimens. Recently, anti-CD19 CAR-T cells have been applied and exhibited considerable efficacy, protecting mice from kidney injury by infiltrating into lymphoid organs and kidneys, and depleting B cells, plasmablasts, and intermediate plasma cells, while with plasma cells spared. Although efficient, whether residual plasma cells could lead to disease relapse needs to be further verified due to the limited follow-up time currently.[56]

Anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis

CAR-T cell therapy was also utilized to treat NMDAR encephalitis, an autoimmune disorder characterized by autoantibodies against NMDAR subunit. The ex and in vivo experiments demonstrated that anti-NMDAR CAAR-T cells well combined the ability of activation, cytotoxicity, proliferation with high specificity and without off-target toxicity, holding promise in providing curative options for autoimmune encephalitis. Anti-NMDAR CAAR-T cells were also found in the meninges, suggesting their possible route into brain through the leptomeninges.[57]

Remaining Challenges for CAR-T Cell Therapy in Autoimmune Diseases

Through preclinical and clinical studies investigating CAR-related therapy for various autoimmune diseases, promising efficacy in serology and gross manifestations for CAR-T, CAAR-T, and CAR-Treg were observed. In addition to these findings, it is crucial to delve into other pivotal dimensions of CAR-T therapy, including the occurrence of adverse events, the persistence of therapeutic effects, and the potential resistance observed in patients [Supplementary Figure 1, http://links.lww.com/CM9/B986]. We also compared the incidence of side effects and persistence of CAR-related therapy between autoimmune diseases and hematological malignancies, with the aim of further optimizing CAR-T therapy for diverse autoimmune diseases.

Adverse effects

CRS

The main adverse effect of CAR-T therapy is CRS, which involves the excessive release of cytokines by immune cells,[58] provoking a systemic inflammatory response. In clinical trials targeting hematological tumors, the incidence of CRS commonly surpasses 70%, sometimes escalating to severe grades,[2,5965] even evolving into fulminant hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis.[66] However, no cases of grade 3 or higher CRS have been reported in clinical trials of CAR-T for autoimmune diseases.[14,19,38,67] This divergence may attribute to the higher target burden in hematologic tumors compared to autoimmune diseases.

ICANS

ICANS is characterized by symptoms such as headache, tremor, speech disturbance, delirium, and impaired consciousness, and in severe cases, cerebral edema. CAR-T cells are significantly increased in the cerebrospinal fluid of patients with ICANS, leading to direct toxic effects on brain cells.[68] Additionally, the destruction of blood–brain barrier results in enormous cytokines leakage into the brain, exacerbating neurotoxicity.[69] Clinical trial data reveal that neurotoxicity often accompanies higher-grade CRS.[2,60,61,63,64] To date, ICANS has not been reported in clinical trials of CAR-T for autoimmune diseases.[14,19,38,67]

Hematotoxicity

Hematotoxicity refers to conditions such as anemia, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, or combinations thereof. Early onset of hematotoxicity may result from lymphocyte depletion prior to CAR-T treatment, while later onset may be associated with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation prior to CAR-T treatment and the severity of CRS during treatment.[70] In a clinical trial of anti-BCMA CAR-T cells for relapsed/refractory NMOSD, the most common grade 3 and higher adverse event was hematotoxicity,[38] while no prolonged or delayed cytopenias have been reported to date in the treatment of autoimmune diseases during the longest follow-up of 17 months.[19,38,52]

Off-target toxicity and on-target off-tumor toxicity

Off-target toxicity and on-target off-tumor toxicity refer to instances where CAR-T cross-reacts with non-targeted molecules or attacks target molecules present in normal tissues. While these toxicities have been reported in clinical trials of CAR-T for autoimmune diseases yet, caution must be exercised in monitoring these phenomena when introducing novel targets in human studies.

Other adverse effects

Therapy-related myelodysplastic syndrome is reported in several clinical studies of hematological tumors with the incidence of 0.9% to 12.9%,[71] rare but of great interest to the research on the late adverse events of CAR-T treatment. And mostly, CAR transgene is inserted into T cells through lentivirus or adenovirus vectors, which can integrate into T cell’s genome, resulting in insertional oncogenesis.[72]

Persistence

The persistence of CAR-T therapy hinges on its ability to recognize target antigens and execute cytotoxic actions. However, there is a phenomenon known as B-cell recurrence, where CAR-T cells lose their functionality in vivo. This may result in the loss of self-immune system protection and potentially trigger disease relapse.[73] Interestingly, a clinical trial of anti-CD19 CAR-T for the treatment of SLE observed B-cell reconstitution without associated SLE relapse, and the reconstituted B cells were mostly CD21+CD27 naïve cells, which can be deemed as a reset of immune system for patients with autoimmune diseases.[19] Similarly, none of the patients experienced a relapse of NMOSD during a median follow-up of 5.5 months, except one patient who had a suspected episode of decreased visual acuity in the left eye at month 14. It is worth noting that anti-BCMA CAR-T cells were detectable in only 17% of patients at month 6.[38] This suggests that the persistence of functional CAR-T might not be the sole determinant of patients’ clinical outcomes. Furthermore, it was found that of the same CAR-T cells exhibited shorter persistence in patients with NMOSD compared to patients with MM, which may be attributed to the lower burden of BCMA target antigens in patients with NMOSD and the poor quality of intrinsic T cells resulting from the prolonged immunosuppressive therapy prior to CAR-T therapy in most patients with relapsed/refractory NMOSD.[38] Whether the relatively short survival of CAR-T cells could lead to autoimmune diseases relapse needs longer follow-up and further monitoring. As for the long survival of CAR-T cells in vivo, it may bring additional benefits to patients or lead to long-term deficiency of B cells that increases the risk of infection. Whether the long persistence of CAR-T cells is necessary in autoimmune diseases requires further improvement of CAR-T cell engineering or adopting CAAR-T cells to specifically eliminate autoreactive B cells.

Resistance

While CAR-T therapy holds promise for refractory patients, there are instances where patients exhibit poor response. For example, in a clinical trial of anti-CD19 CAR-T for relapsed/refractory SLE, patient 3 encountered transient proteinuria at month 4 post-infusion. And his SLEDAI-2K score was 2, not decreasing to 0.[19] In addition, patient 1 subjected to anti-BCMA CAR-T therapy experienced a suspected decrease in visual acuity 14 months after infusion.[38] The early onset of poor response may be related to cumulative organ damage prior to treatment, which is consistent with the patient 3 with stage IV lupus kidney impairment at baseline. While later symptomatic relapses after CAR-T treatment could be attributed to target antigen loss or CAR-T cell exhaustion. In a flow cytometry analysis after anti-CD19 CAR-T treatment of R/R B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia, it was observed that 12 out of 17 patients progressed to CD19-negative disease, with genomic sequencing revealing CD19 mutations in all 12 patients,[74] demonstrating that target loss due to mutation is one of the mechanisms of triggering relapse. Besides, CAR-T cells may fail to generate an immune response when the target antigen density falls below the threshold.[75] And the level of AQP4-IgG in the serum of patient 1 with decreased visual acuity showed an earlier rebound, suggesting CAR-T cell exhaustion.

Innovation of CAR-T Therapy in Autoimmune Diseases

This section delves into insights from studies focusing on enhancing CAR-T therapy for hematologic tumors, aiming to extrapolate strategies for its advancement in autoimmune diseases.

CAR-T structure innovation

CAR structure

CAR consists of four components: antigen-binding domain, hinge domain, transmembrane domain, and intracellular domain. Based on its structure, CAR can be improved in the following ways: (1) Reducing single chain fragment variable (scFv) affinity: The scFv is a main constituent of antigen-binding domain, which confers CAR the capability of recognizing target antigens with non-MHC restriction and is closely associated with “on-target, off-tumor” adverse effect.[76] Liu et al[77] demonstrated that CAR-Ts with lower affinity scFv showed potent antitumor activity against ErbB2-overexpressing tumors while exhibiting less response to normal physiological ErbB2 levels. This suggests that lowering scFv affinity can help differentiate between normal and abnormal cells, thus minimizing damage to healthy tissues. (2) Adjusting hinge domain length: the hinge domain participates in immune synapse formation, which influences signal transduction. It has been shown that anti-CD19 CAR with a longer spacer fails to eliminate Raji tumors and induces activation-induced cell death, while the short-spacer CAR-T cells exhibit effective recognition and anti-tumor effects. Conversely, anti-R11 CAR requires a longer spacer due to the proximity of the target antigen to the surface of tumor cells.[78] Therefore, an appropriate spacer length needs to be designed based on the distance between the target antigen and the target cells surface. (3) Selecting co-stimulatory molecules in transmembrane domain: since second-generation CAR-T cells, the transmembrane domain consists of CD3ξ or FcγR as the first signal for T cell activation, and incorporates costimulatory molecules (e.g., CD28, 4-1BB) as the second activation signal. Different costimulatory molecules yield varying cytotoxicity, persistence of CAR-T cells in vivo.[79] For example, 4-1BB confers slower expansion, longer persistence, and stronger cytolysis to CAR-T compared to CD28[80] and also mitigates CAR-T exhaustion.[81] (4) Adding diversity to the intracellular domain: it contains CD3 immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motif (ITAM), pivotal for downstream signaling of T cell activation. Currently, the most commonly used CD3 type is CD3ξ, harboring three ITAMs that amplify CAR-T sensitivity to target antigens.[82] However, studies have shown that introduction of CD3ε into anti-CD19-28Z CAR-T cells with pre-existing CD3ξ can lead to longer persistence and reduced cytokine release, suggesting that augmenting CD3 diversity of CAR may contribute to an improved signaling profile.[83]

CAAR-T

Autoimmune diseases have a relatively low burden of target antigens, with the primary pathology stemming from autoantibodies produced by plasma cells. Therefore, employing CAR-T therapy to deplete all B cells is an overkill, which increases the risk of adverse reactions. However, this drawback can be overcome by utilizing CAAR-T cells, which antigen-binding domains made of self-antigens. These CAAR-T cells can recognize BCRs and kill self-reactive B cells while sparing normal ones. For instance, Ellebrecht et al[12] constructed anti-Dsg3 CAAR-T cells that showed specific cytotoxicity against anti-Dsg3 BCR-expressing cells in vitro. In vivo studies demonstrated that these cells could expand, persist, and selectively eliminate Dsg3-specific B cells. CAAR-T cells offer several advantages in the treatment of autoimmune disease, including selective elimination of self-antigen reactive B cells without damaging normal ones, reduction in the incidence of CRS due to the lower cytokine production because of the elimination of a portion of B cells, and individualized targeted therapies.

CAR-NK

NK cells, alongside T and B cells, constitute a major lymphocyte subgroup capable of non-specific and non-MHC-restricted direct killing of tumor cells. Currently, CAR-NK cells research has mainly focused on hematological and solid tumors, and the results elucidate that compared to CAR-T cells, CAR-NK cells could prevent off-target toxicity due to their shorter lifespan. One advantage of CAR-NK cells is their production of cytokines such as interferon γ and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, which are less likely to induce CRS compared to interleukin 6 produced by CAR-T cells.[84] This makes CAR-NK cells a safer alternative. In terms of efficacy, an experiment revealed improvement in splenomegaly and reduction in the number of PD-1+CD4+ T cells in lupus-like mice treated with CAR-NK cells.[85]

CAR-Treg

Abnormal immune regulation, often driven by factors such as Foxp3 gene mutation causing Treg cell depletion or dysfunction, plays a crucial role in autoimmune diseases such as IBD and allergies.[86] By incorporating CAR into Treg cells, where the antigen-binding domain of the CAR targets specifically to the particular alloantigen or autoantigen, they can exert an immunosuppressive effect and strongly inhibit the homozygous or autoimmune response.[87] The application of CAR-Tregs is particularly relevant in graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). MacDonald et al[87] demonstrated that anti-HLA-A2 CAR-Tregs prevented GVHD development in immunodeficient mice. Moreover, several preclinical studies have explored the potential of CAR-Tregs in treating autoimmune diseases like MS, vitiligo, and IBD, all of which have demonstrated improvement in symptoms and serologic markers.[88]

Combination therapy

In cases of CAR-T therapy relapse, salvage therapy emerges as a potential approach to extend life expectancy. Van Oekelen et al[89] recruited patients with MM who had relapsed following anti-BCMA CAR-T treatment. The results showed that these patients gained approximately 3.5 months of PFS after 2 months (median) of salvage regimen; gained a median of 9.1 months of PFS by administering T-cell related therapies (e.g., CAR-T and bispecific antibodies) immediately after relapse; and patients who received allogeneic/autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation as salvage therapy, achieved a median overall survival of 23.2 months. Although autoimmune disease relapse after CAR-T therapy has not yet been reported, the insights gained from salvage regimens provide valuable knowledge for addressing potential relapse scenarios. In addition to salvage therapy, combining two antigens as a target works as well. A clinical trial combined anti-BCMA CAR-T cells and anti-CD19 CAR-T cells, indicating an impressive overall response rate of 92%, with complete remission or better observed in 60% of MM patients, and the median PFS extended to 18.3 months. Therefore, compared to CAR-T therapy alone, combination therapy appears to induce more durable responses and prolong PFS,[90] potentially shaping the optimization of treatment approaches for relapsed/refractory autoimmune diseases.

In conclusion, CAR-T cell therapy has shown considerable efficacy and safety in relapsed/refractory autoimmune diseases. It offers precise targeting and drug-free remission, distinguishing it from traditional therapies. Autoimmune diseases generally have a lower burden of target antigens compared to hematological tumors, reducing the required CAR-T dosage and the likelihood of adverse reactions. Despite these promising advancements, the realm of CAR-related therapy for autoimmune diseases remains relatively limited in scope. To further advance this field, additional experiments should be conducted with larger sample sizes, longer experimental timelines, and rigorous long-term safety monitoring. By building upon the knowledge gained from CAR-T treatment for hematological tumors, there is an opportunity to optimize the clinical application of CAR-related therapy for R/R autoimmune diseases. Continued innovation and research will contribute to the maturation of this therapy and its potential to provide improved outcomes for patients with autoimmune conditions.

Funding

This study was supported by grants from the Ministry of Science and Technology China Brain Initiative Grant STI2030-Major Projects (No. 2022ZD0204700), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 82371404, 82271341, 82071380, and 81873743), and the Knowledge Innovation Program of Wuhan Shuguang Project (No. 2022020801020454).

Conflicts of interest

None.

Supplementary Material

cm9-137-1140-s001.pdf (291.7KB, pdf)

Footnotes

Yuxin Liu and Minghao Dong contributed equally to this work.

How to cite this article: Liu YX, Dong MH, Chu YH, Zhou LQ, You YF, Pang XW, Yang S, Zhang LY, Chen L, Zhu LF, Xiao J, Wang W, Qin C, Tian DS. Dawn of CAR-T cell therapy in autoimmune diseases. Chin Med J 2024;137:1140–1150. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000003111

References

  • 1.Zhang J Hu Y Yang J Li W Zhang M Wang Q, et al. Non-viral, specifically targeted CAR-T cells achieve high safety and efficacy in B-NHL. Nature 2022;609:369–374. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05140-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Raje N Berdeja J Lin Y Siegel D Jagannath S Madduri D, et al. Anti-BCMA CAR T-cell therapy bb2121 in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 2019;380:1726–1737. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1817226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Westin J, Sehn LH. CAR T cells as a second-line therapy for large B-cell lymphoma: A paradigm shift? Blood 2022;139:2737–2746. doi: 10.1182/blood.2022015789. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Li X, Li W, Xu L, Song Y. Chimeric antigen receptor-immune cells against solid tumors: Structures, mechanisms, recent advances, and future developments. Chin Med J 2023. doi: 10.1097/cm9.0000000000002818. [Last accessed on February 9 2024]. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Albert D Dunham J Khan S Stansberry J Kolasinski S Tsai D, et al. Variability in the biological response to anti-CD20 B cell depletion in systemic lupus erythaematosus. Ann Rheum Dis 2008;67:1724–1731. doi: 10.1136/ard.2007.083162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hanauer SB Feagan BG Lichtenstein GR Mayer LF Schreiber S Colombel JF, et al. Maintenance infliximab for Crohn’s disease: The ACCENT I randomised trial. Lancet 2002;359:1541–1549. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(02)08512-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Smolen JS Beaulieu A Rubbert-Roth A Ramos-Remus C Rovensky J Alecock E, et al. Effect of interleukin-6 receptor inhibition with tocilizumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (OPTION study): A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised trial. Lancet 2008;371:987–997. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(08)60453-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Su M, Zhao C, Luo S. Therapeutic potential of chimeric antigen receptor based therapies in autoimmune diseases. Autoimmun Rev 2022;21:102931. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2021.102931. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Afif W Loftus EV Jr. Faubion WA Kane SV Bruining DH Hanson KA, et al. Clinical utility of measuring infliximab and human anti-chimeric antibody concentrations in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Am J Gastroenterol 2010;105:1133–1139. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2010.9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Posner J, Barrington P, Brier T, Datta-Mannan A. Monoclonal antibodies: Past, present and future. Handb Exp Pharmacol 2019;260:81–141. doi: 10.1007/164_2019_323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kansal R Richardson N Neeli I Khawaja S Chamberlain D Ghani M, et al. Sustained B cell depletion by CD19-targeted CAR T cells is a highly effective treatment for murine lupus. Sci Transl Med 2019;11:eaav1648. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aav1648. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ellebrecht CT Bhoj VG Nace A Choi EJ Mao X Cho MJ, et al. Reengineering chimeric antigen receptor T cells for targeted therapy of autoimmune disease. Science 1979;2016:179–184. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf6756. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Noyan F Zimmermann K Hardtke-Wolenski M Knoefel A Schulde E Geffers R, et al. Prevention of allograft rejection by use of regulatory T cells with an MHC-specific chimeric antigen receptor. Am J Transplant 2017;17:917–930. doi: 10.1111/ajt.14175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Mougiakakos D Krönke G Völkl S Kretschmann S Aigner M Kharboutli S, et al. CD19-targeted CAR T cells in refractory systemic lupus erythematosus. N Engl J Med 2021;385:567–569. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2107725. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.June CH, Sadelain M. Chimeric antigen receptor therapy. N Engl J Med 2018;379:64–73. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1706169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kiriakidou M, Ching CL. Systemic lupus erythematosus. Ann Intern Med 2020;172:ITC81–ITC96. doi: 10.7326/aitc202006020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Jin X Xu Q Pu C Zhu K Lu C Jiang Y, et al. Therapeutic efficacy of anti-CD19 CAR-T cells in a mouse model of systemic lupus erythematosus. Cell Mol Immunol 2021;18:1896–1903. doi: 10.1038/s41423-020-0472-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Reighard SD Cranert SA Rangel KM Ali A Gyurova IE de la Cruz-Lynch AT, et al. Therapeutic targeting of follicular T cells with chimeric antigen receptor-expressing natural killer cells. Cell Rep Med 2020;1:100003. doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2020.100003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Mackensen A Müller F Mougiakakos D Böltz S Wilhelm A Aigner M, et al. Anti-CD19 CAR T cell therapy for refractory systemic lupus erythematosus. Nat Med 2022;28:2124–2132. doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-02017-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Zhang W Feng J Cinquina A Wang Q Xu H Zhang Q, et al. Treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus using BCMA-CD19 compound CAR. Stem Cell Rev Rep 2021;17:2120–2123. doi: 10.1007/s12015-021-10251-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Jiang N Li Q Li H Fang Y Wu L Duan X, et al. Chinese registry of rheumatoid arthritis (CREDIT) V: sex impacts rheumatoid arthritis in Chinese patients. Chin Med J 2022;135:2210–2217. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000002110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Smolen JS, Aletaha D, McInnes IB. Rheumatoid arthritis. Lancet 2016;388:2023–2038. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(16)30173-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Zhang B Wang Y Yuan Y Sun J Liu L Huang D, et al. In vitro elimination of autoreactive B cells from rheumatoid arthritis patients by universal chimeric antigen receptor T cells. Ann Rheum Dis 2021;80:176–184. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-217844. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Whittington KB, Prislovsky A, Beaty J, Albritton L, Radic M, Rosloniec EF. CD8(+) T cells expressing an HLA-DR1 chimeric antigen receptor target autoimmune CD4(+) T cells in an antigen-specific manner and inhibit the development of autoimmune arthritis. J Immunol 2022;208:16–26. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.2100643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Li YJ, Chen Z. Cell-based therapies for rheumatoid arthritis: Opportunities and challenges. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis 2022;14:1759720X221100294. doi: 10.1177/1759720x221100294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Zhang L Sosinowski T Cox AR Cepeda JR Sekhar NS Hartig SM, et al. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells targeting a pathogenic MHC class II:peptide complex modulate the progression of autoimmune diabetes. J Autoimmun 2019;96:50–58. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2018.08.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kobayashi S Thelin MA Parrish HL Deshpande NR Lee MS Karimzadeh A, et al. A biomimetic five-module chimeric antigen receptor ((5M)CAR) designed to target and eliminate antigen-specific T cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2020;117:28950–28959. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2012495117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Radichev IA, Yoon J, Scott DW, Griffin K, Savinov AY. Towards antigen-specific Tregs for type 1 diabetes: Construction and functional assessment of pancreatic endocrine marker, HPi2-based chimeric antigen receptor. Cell Immunol 2020;358:104224. doi: 10.1016/j.cellimm.2020.104224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Tenspolde M Zimmermann K Weber LC Hapke M Lieber M Dywicki J, et al. Regulatory T cells engineered with a novel insulin-specific chimeric antigen receptor as a candidate immunotherapy for type 1 diabetes. J Autoimmun 2019;103:102289. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2019.05.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Pieper T Roth KDR Glaser V Riet T Buitrago-Molina LE Hagedorn M, et al. Generation of chimeric antigen receptors against tetraspanin 7. Cells 2023;12:1453. doi: 10.3390/cells12111453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Comi G Bar-Or A Lassmann H Uccelli A Hartung HP Montalban X, et al. Role of B cells in multiple sclerosis and related disorders. Ann Neurol 2021;89:13–23. doi: 10.1002/ana.25927. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Sedaghat N, Etemadifar M. Inducing chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) regulatory T cells in-vivo: A novel concept for a potential feasible cure of demyelinating diseases. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2022;57:103341. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2021.103341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Fransson M Piras E Burman J Nilsson B Essand M Lu B, et al. CAR/FoxP3-engineered T regulatory cells target the CNS and suppress EAE upon intranasal delivery. J Neuroinflammation 2012;9:112. doi: 10.1186/1742-2094-9-112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.De Paula Pohl A, Schmidt A, Zhang AH, Maldonado T, Königs C, Scott DW. Engineered regulatory T cells expressing myelin-specific chimeric antigen receptors suppress EAE progression. Cell Immunol 2020;358:104222. doi: 10.1016/j.cellimm.2020.104222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Gupta S Simic M Sagan SA Shepherd C Duecker J Sobel RA, et al. CAR-T cell-mediated B-cell depletion in central nervous system autoimmunity. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm 2023;10:e200080. doi: 10.1212/nxi.0000000000200080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Mitsdoerffer M Di Liberto G Dötsch S Sie C Wagner I Pfaller M, et al. Formation and immunomodulatory function of meningeal B cell aggregates in progressive CNS autoimmunity. Brain 2021;144:1697–1710. doi: 10.1093/brain/awab093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Pittock SJ, Zekeridou A, Weinshenker BG. Hope for patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders – From mechanisms to trials. Nat Rev Neurol 2021;17:759–773. doi: 10.1038/s41582-021-00568-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Qin C Tian DS Zhou LQ Shang K Huang L Dong MH, et al. Anti-BCMA CAR T-cell therapy CT103A in relapsed or refractory AQP4-IgG seropositive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders: Phase 1 trial interim results. Signal Transduct Target Ther 2023;8:5. doi: 10.1038/s41392-022-01278-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Gilhus NE. Myasthenia gravis. N Engl J Med 2016;375:2570–2581. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1602678. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Oh S Mao X Manfredo-Vieira S Lee J Patel D Choi EJ, et al. Precision targeting of autoantigen-specific B cells in muscle-specific tyrosine kinase myasthenia gravis with chimeric autoantibody receptor T cells. Nat Biotechnol 2023;41:1229–1238. doi: 10.1038/s41587-022-01637-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Granit V Benatar M Kurtoglu M Miljković MD Chahin N Sahagian G, et al. Safety and clinical activity of autologous RNA chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy in myasthenia gravis (MG-001): A prospective, multicentre, open-label, non-randomised phase 1b/2a study. Lancet Neurol 2023;22:578–590. doi: 10.1016/s1474-4422(23)00194-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Bieber K, Kridin K, Emtenani S, Boch K, Schmidt E, Ludwig RJ. Milestones in personalized medicine in pemphigus and pemphigoid. Front Immunol 2020;11:591971. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.591971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Yanovsky RL, McLeod M, Ahmed AR. Treatment of pemphigus vulgaris: Part 2 – Emerging therapies. Expert Rev Clin Immunol 2019;15:1061–1071. doi: 10.1080/1744666x.2020.1672539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Lee J Lundgren DK Mao X Manfredo-Vieira S Nunez-Cruz S Williams EF, et al. Antigen-specific B cell depletion for precision therapy of mucosal pemphigus vulgaris. J Clin Invest 2020;130:6317–6324. doi: 10.1172/jci138416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Wright EK, Ding NS, Niewiadomski O. Management of inflammatory bowel disease. Med J Aust 2018;209:318–323. doi: 10.5694/mja17.01001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Elinav E, Waks T, Eshhar Z. Redirection of regulatory T cells with predetermined specificity for the treatment of experimental colitis in mice. Gastroenterology 2008;134:2014–2024. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.02.060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Elinav E, Adam N, Waks T, Eshhar Z. Amelioration of colitis by genetically engineered murine regulatory T cells redirected by antigen-specific chimeric receptor. Gastroenterology 2009;136:1721–1731. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.01.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Boardman DA Wong MQ Rees WD Wu D Himmel ME Orban PC, et al. Flagellin-specific human CAR Tregs for immune regulation in IBD. J Autoimmun 2023;134:102961. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2022.102961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Meng H Sun X Song Y Zou J An G Jin Z, et al. La/SSB chimeric autoantibody receptor modified NK92MI cells for targeted therapy of autoimmune disease. Clin Immunol 2018;192:40–49. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2018.04.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Opinc AH, Makowska JS. Antisynthetase syndrome – Much more than just a myopathy. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2021;51:72–83. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2020.09.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Pecher AC Hensen L Klein R Schairer R Lutz K Atar D, et al. CD19-targeting CAR T cells for myositis and interstitial lung disease associated with antisynthetase syndrome. JAMA 2023;329:2154–2162. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.8753. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Müller F Boeltz S Knitza J Aigner M Völkl S Kharboutli S, et al. CD19-targeted CAR T cells in refractory antisynthetase syndrome. Lancet 2023;401:815–818. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(23)00023-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Taubmann J Knitza J Müller F Völkl S Aigner M Kleyer A, et al. Rescue therapy of antisynthetase syndrome with CD19-targeted CAR-T-cells after failure of several B cell depleting antibodies. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2023;63:e12–e14. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kead330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Yeh WZ, Dyck PJ, van den Berg LH, Kiernan MC, Taylor BV. Multifocal motor neuropathy: Controversies and priorities. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2020;91:140–148. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2019-321532. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Jhaveri KS Schlam I Holtzman NG Peravali M Richardson PK Dahiya S, et al. Safety and efficacy of CAR T cells in a patient with lymphoma and a coexisting autoimmune neuropathy. Blood Adv 2020;4:6019–6022. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020003176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Lodka D Zschummel M Bunse M Rousselle A Sonnemann J Kettritz R, et al. CD19-targeting CAR T cells protect from ANCA-induced acute kidney injury. Ann Rheum Dis 2024:ard–2023–224875. doi: 10.1136/ard-2023-224875. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Reincke SM von Wardenburg N Homeyer MA Kornau HC Spagni G Li LY, et al. Chimeric autoantibody receptor T cells deplete NMDA receptor-specific B cells. Cell 2023;186:5084–5097.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2023.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Jarczak D, Nierhaus A. Cytokine storm-definition, causes, and implications. Int J Mol Sci 2022;23:11740. doi: 10.3390/ijms231911740. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Qi Y Zhao M Hu Y Wang Y Li P Cao J, et al. Efficacy and safety of CD19-specific CAR T cell-based therapy in B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients. Blood 2022;139:3376–3386. doi: 10.1182/blood.2021013733. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Quintas-Cardama A. GPRC5D-targeted CAR T cells for myeloma. N Engl J Med 2022;387:2295–2296. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2213985. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Shah NN Lee DW Yates B Yuan CM Shalabi H Martin S, et al. Long-term follow-up of CD19-CAR T-cell therapy in children and young adults with B-ALL. J Clin Oncol 2021;39:1650–1659. doi: 10.1200/jco.20.02262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Hu Y Zhou Y Zhang M Ge W Li Y Yang L, et al. CRISPR/Cas9-engineered universal CD19/CD22 dual-targeted CAR-T cell therapy for relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Clin Cancer Res 2021;27:2764–2772. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.Ccr-20-3863. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Berdeja JG Madduri D Usmani SZ Jakubowiak A Agha M Cohen AD, et al. Ciltacabtagene autoleucel, a B-cell maturation antigen-directed chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (CARTITUDE-1): A phase 1b/2 open-label study. Lancet 2021;398:314–324. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00933-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Wang M Munoz J Goy A Locke FL Jacobson CA Hill BT, et al. KTE-X19 CAR T-cell therapy in relapsed or refractory mantle-cell lymphoma. N Engl J Med 2020;382:1331–1342. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1914347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Li CG Mei H Hu Y Guo T Liu L Jiang HW, et al. A bispecific CAR-T cell therapy targeting Bcma and CD38 for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: Updated results from a phase 1 dose-climbing trial. Blood 2019;134(Suppl 1):930. doi: 10.1182/blood-2019-130340. [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Neelapu SS Tummala S Kebriaei P Wierda W Gutierrez C Locke FL, et al. Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy-assessment and management of toxicities. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2018;15:47–62. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2017.148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Schett G Boeltz S Muller F Kleyer A Volkl S Aigner M, et al. CAR-T cell treatment of refractory systemic lupus erythematosus–Safety and preliminary efficacy data from the first four patients. Ann Rheum Dis 2022;81:185. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2022-eular.1120. [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Lee DW Kochenderfer JN Stetler-Stevenson M Cui YK Delbrook C Feldman SA, et al. T cells expressing CD19 chimeric antigen receptors for acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in children and young adults: A phase 1 dose-escalation trial. Lancet 2015;385:517–528. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(14)61403-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Sheth VS, Gauthier J. Taming the beast: CRS and ICANS after CAR T-cell therapy for ALL. Bone Marrow Transplant 2021;56:552–566. doi: 10.1038/s41409-020-01134-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Fried S Avigdor A Bielorai B Meir A Besser MJ Schachter J, et al. Early and late hematologic toxicity following CD19 CAR-T cells. Bone Marrow Transplant 2019;54:1643–1650. doi: 10.1038/s41409-019-0487-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Zhao AQ, Zhao MZ, Qian WB, Liang AB, Li P, Liu H. Secondary myeloid neoplasms after CD19 CAR T therapy in patients with refractory/relapsed B-cell lymphoma: Case series and review of literature. Front Immunol 2023;13:1063986. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1063986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Moco PD, Aharony N, Kamen A. Adeno-associated viral vectors for homology-directed generation of CAR-T cells. Biotechnol J 2020;15:e1900286. doi: 10.1002/biot.201900286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Baker DJ, June CH. CAR T therapy extends its reach to autoimmune diseases. Cell 2022;185:4471–4473. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2022.10.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Orlando EJ Han X Tribouley C Wood PA Leary RJ Riester M, et al. Genetic mechanisms of target antigen loss in CAR19 therapy of acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Nat Med 2018;24:1504–1506. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0146-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Hamieh M Dobrin A Cabriolu A van der Stegen SJC Giavridis T Mansilla-Soto J, et al. CAR T cell trogocytosis and cooperative killing regulate tumour antigen escape. Nature 2019;568:112–116. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1054-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Flugel CL Majzner RG Krenciute G Dotti G Riddell SR Wagner DL, et al. Overcoming on-target, off-tumour toxicity of CAR T cell therapy for solid tumours. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2023;20:49–62. doi: 10.1038/s41571-022-00704-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Liu X Jiang S Fang C Yang S Olalere D Pequignot EC, et al. Affinity-tuned ErbB2 or EGFR chimeric antigen receptor T cells exhibit an increased therapeutic index against tumors in mice. Cancer Res 2015;75:3596–3607. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.Can-15-0159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Hudecek M Sommermeyer D Kosasih PL Silva-Benedict A Liu L Rader C, et al. The nonsignaling extracellular spacer domain of chimeric antigen receptors is decisive for in vivo antitumor activity. Cancer Immunol Res 2015;3:125–135. doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.Cir-14-0127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Jayaraman J Mellody MP Hou AJ Desai RP Fung AW Pham AHT, et al. CAR-T design: Elements and their synergistic function. EBioMedicine 2020;58:102931. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2020.102931. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Larson RC, Maus MV. Recent advances and discoveries in the mechanisms and functions of CAR T cells. Nat Rev Cancer 2021;21:145–161. doi: 10.1038/s41568-020-00323-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Zhao Z Condomines M van der Stegen SJC Perna F Kloss CC Gunset G, et al. Structural design of engineered costimulation determines tumor rejection kinetics and persistence of CAR T cells. Cancer Cell 2015;28:415–428. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2015.09.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Haynes NM Snook MB Trapani JA Cerruti L Jane SM Smyth MJ, et al. Redirecting mouse CTL against colon carcinoma: Superior signaling efficacy of single-chain variable domain chimeras containing TCR-zeta vs Fc epsilon RI-gamma. J Immunol 2001;166:182–187. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.166.1.182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Wu W Zhou Q Masubuchi T Shi X Li H Xu X, et al. Multiple signaling roles of CD3ε and its application in CAR-T cell therapy. Cell 2020;182:855–871.e23. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.07.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Morvan MG, Lanier LL. NK cells and cancer: You can teach innate cells new tricks. Nat Rev Cancer 2016;16:7–19. doi: 10.1038/nrc.2015.5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.King C. CAR NK cell therapy for T follicular helper cells. Cell Rep Med 2020;1:100009. doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2020.100009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Sakaguchi S, Mikami N, Wing JB, Tanaka A, Ichiyama K, Ohkura N. Regulatory T cells and human disease. Annu Rev Immunol 2020;38:541–566. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-042718-041717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.MacDonald KG Hoeppli RE Huang Q Gillies J Luciani DS Orban PC, et al. Alloantigen-specific regulatory T cells generated with a chimeric antigen receptor. J Clin Invest 2016;126:1413–1424. doi: 10.1172/jci82771. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Arjomandnejad M, Kopec AL, Keeler AM. CAR-T regulatory (CAR-Treg) cells: Engineering and applications. Biomedicines 2022;10:287. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10020287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Van Oekelen O Nath K Mouhieddine TH Farzana T Aleman A Melnekoff DT, et al. Interventions and outcomes of patients with multiple myeloma receiving salvage therapy after BCMA-directed CAR T therapy. Blood 2023;141:756–765. doi: 10.1182/blood.2022017848. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Wang Y Cao J Gu WY Shi M Lan JP Yan ZL, et al. Long-term follow-up of combination of B-cell maturation antigen and CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T cells in multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol 2022;40:2246–2256. doi: 10.1200/jco.21.01676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Chinese Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer Health

RESOURCES