Showing posts with label life. Show all posts
Showing posts with label life. Show all posts

Tuesday, December 21, 2021

LightOn Photonic coprocessor integrated into European AI Supercomputer

** Nuit Blanche is now on Twitter: @NuitBlog **

This is history of computing in the making stuff!


Four years ago to the day, LightOn’s first Optical Processing Unit (OPU) had its first light in a Data Center showing that our technology was data center ready.

It is with immense pride and pleasure to announce that LightOn’s OPU has been installed in one of the world’s Top500 supercomputer as part of a pilot program with GENCI and IDRIS/CNRS.


The team at LightOn is immensely proud to write the future of computing in this world-first integration of a computing photonic device into an HPC infrastructure.

The press release can be found here.

Thank you GENCI and IDRIS/CNRS for making this happen!

 
Follow @NuitBlog or join the CompressiveSensing Reddit, the Facebook page, the Compressive Sensing group on LinkedIn  or the Advanced Matrix Factorization group on LinkedIn

Liked this entry ? subscribe to Nuit Blanche's feed, there's more where that came from. You can also subscribe to Nuit Blanche by Email.

Other links:
Paris Machine LearningMeetup.com||@Archives||LinkedIn||Facebook|| @ParisMLGroup About LightOnNewsletter ||@LightOnIO|| on LinkedIn || on CrunchBase || our Blog
About myselfLightOn || Google Scholar || LinkedIn ||@IgorCarron ||Homepage||ArXiv

Thursday, April 11, 2019

Nuit Blanche is back !

It's been a while since I have been writing much on Nuit Blanche. This post is to let y'all know that I should be more active in the coming weeks, months. We're back !






Join the CompressiveSensing subreddit or the Facebook page and post there !
Liked this entry ? subscribe to Nuit Blanche's feed, there's more where that came from. You can also subscribe to Nuit Blanche by Email, explore the Big Picture in Compressive Sensing or the Matrix Factorization Jungle and join the conversations on compressive sensing, advanced matrix factorization and calibration issues on Linkedin.

Sunday, October 01, 2017

Sunday Morning Insight: The Demise of Cassini and the Rise of Artificial InteIligence

In the past few weeks, two events connected to the whole Artificial Intelligence narrative occurred: Cassini plunged into Saturn while NIPS conference registrations closed in an, unheard of, record amount of time.


Pretty often the Artificial Intelligence narratives revolve around one factor and then explains away why the field cannot go on because that factor is not new, not good anymore, not whatever...... That sort of narrative was pushed by Tech Review when it mentioned that AI may be plateauing because "Neural Networks" are thirty or more years old. Yes, neural networks have existed for a long time and no AI is not going to be plateauing because it actually hinges on several factors, not one.

This is the story of one of these factors. 

It started thanks in large part to Space exploration, and no, we are not talking about the awesome Deep Space 1 spacecraft [1] even though much like that spacecraft, that story also started at JPL.

When Dan Goldin became NASA administrator, he pushed a series of constraints on new space missions that had the whole NASA organisation integrate newer, better technologies faster in the design of less expensive space missions [2]. In fact, Cassini was seen as the mission to avoid in the future. From the story told on the JPL website, under the "Faster, Better Cheaper" mantra, one can read:
Without finding ways to cut costs substantially, JPL faced extinction. The NASA budget would not support enough Cassini-scale missions to keep the lab operating.
The vast majority of cameras in space missions had, until then, used CCD devices. While the technology provided high quality images, it was brittle. For one, it required cooling to get some good signal over noise ratio. That cooling in turn meant that the imagers required more power to operate and could fail more systematically during launch phases. It was also a line based design meaning that you could lose an entire line of pixels at once. In short, it was fragile and more importantly the technology made the sensor heavier, a cardinal sin in Space Exploration.

Then came Eric Fossum. This is what you can read on his Wikipedia entry:

....One of the instrument goals was to miniaturize charge-coupled device (CCD) camera systems onboard interplanetary spacecraft. In response, Fossum invented a new CMOS active pixel sensor (APS) with intra-pixel charge transfer camera-on-a-chip technology, now just called the CMOS Image Sensor or CIS[5][6] (active pixel sensors without intra-pixel charge transfer were described much earlier, by Noble in 1968.[7] As part of Goldin's directive to transfer space technology to the public sector whenever possible, Fossum led the CMOS APS development and subsequent transfer of the technology to US industry, including Eastman Kodak, AT&T Bell LabsNational Semiconductor and others. Despite initial skepticism by entrenched CCD manufacturers, the CMOS image sensor technology is now used in almost all cell-phone cameras, many medical applications such as capsule endoscopy and dental x-ray systems, scientific imaging, automotive safety systems, DSLR digital cameras and many other applications.  
Since CMOS rely on the same process as used in computing chips, it scaled big time and became very cheap. In fact, the very creation of massive image and video collections of datasets hosted by the likes of YouTube then Google, Flickr then Yahoo!, InstaGram then Facebook and most other internet companies, was uniquely enabled by the arrival of CMOS in consumer imaging, first in cameras and then in smartphones:

 The size of these datasets enabled the ability to train very large neural networks beyond toy models. New algorithm developments on top of neural networks and large datasets brought error rates down to the point where large internet companies could soon begin to utilize these techniques on the data that had been collected since the early 2000's on their servers. 
  
On September 14th 2017, Cassini was downloading it's last CCD-based images and all the registration at NIPS, one of the most well known ML/DL/AI conference, sold out three months ahead of the meeting: a feat that is unheard of for a specialist's conference. The conference will be held in Long Beach, not far from JPL where, somehow, the sensor that started it all, was born.


Résultat de recherche d'images pour "nips registration"
One more thing, Eric Fossum is building the QIS, the next generation imaging sensor [3] that will produce more pixels..... 

Notes.
[2] The TRL scale that everyone uses these days, ( and translated for the first time in French was here on Nuit Blanche) was born around that time so that NASA could evaluate what technology could be integrated faster into space missions. 
[3] Check our discussion on QIS and compressive sensing.

Join the CompressiveSensing subreddit or the Google+ Community or the Facebook page and post there !

Monday, August 21, 2017

The Sun Eclipse of 2017

Credit: NASA/JPL/Space Science Institute
Released: December 18, 2009 (PIA 11648)


The webcast for this coming eclipse will start in 15 minutes here: https://eclipse2017.nasa.gov/
The eclipse itself will be viewable in an hour.
The first telescope to check seems to be the one from Madras, Oregon (with 2.02 minutes of total darkness. )

It's also going to be viewable from the International Space Station, woohoo !









Join the CompressiveSensing subreddit or the Google+ Community or the Facebook page and post there !
Liked this entry ? subscribe to Nuit Blanche's feed, there's more where that came from. You can also subscribe to Nuit Blanche by Email, explore the Big Picture in Compressive Sensing or the Matrix Factorization Jungle and join the conversations on compressive sensing, advanced matrix factorization and calibration issues on Linkedin.

Thursday, June 25, 2015

The Small Victories

As any long distance runner/blogger will tell you, It's the small victories that matter.

Twenty years ago, I got a paper published that was at the crossroads between extreme fluid dynamics (two phase flow in a turbulent regime in zero gravity) and something that could be viewed today as a Machine Learning classification task.  Because it was way far from traditional approaches in that area of engineering, it had problems with the peer review (I think it got eventually accepted because the reviewer actually died and there were too few specialists in this area to say something about what we had).

It so happens that our recent paper in Scientific Reports has just garnered more citations that than paper.




 
 
Join the CompressiveSensing subreddit or the Google+ Community and post there !
Liked this entry ? subscribe to Nuit Blanche's feed, there's more where that came from. You can also subscribe to Nuit Blanche by Email, explore the Big Picture in Compressive Sensing or the Matrix Factorization Jungle and join the conversations on compressive sensing, advanced matrix factorization and calibration issues on Linkedin.

Friday, August 24, 2012

The First Programmable Robot You've Never Heard of

As I was visiting the Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers museum of Technology (CNAM) in Paris the other day, I came upon a loom that I don't think I had ever heard of before. Back in 1740's, a man by the name of Jacques de Vaucanson devised a fully automated weaving process. According to Wikipedia:
His proposals for the automation of the weaving process, although ignored during his lifetime, were later perfected and implemented by Joseph Marie Jacquard, the creator of the Jacquard loom.
From that text, one could infer that it was just an earlier design of the Jacquard loom. It doesn't seem to be the case however:







Next to the loom, there are two  descriptions, one in French and and one in English. The English version is only a subset of the full explanation provided in French. Here is my poor translation attmpt of the French text that is not provided in the English description:

A real automated weaving machine, the loom starts operating thanks to a simple handle and therefore radically transforms the gestures of the weaver. In 1747, The newspaper "Le Mercure de France" recounts the following: " One can see the whole cloth being fabricated without any human intervention, i.e. one can see the chain [sic] open, then the shuttle throws the frame, then the clapper hits the cloth with more accuracy than possible with the human hand"

The loom remained a prototype with no direct descendant. The mechanics inspired other inventors like Jacquard who did put it back in shape at the Conservatoire des Arts et Metiers at the beginning of the 19th century.

Let me get this straight, a fully programmable robot saw the light of the day in 1747 never to be directly copied later because it took jobs away from humans ? I did not know that, and I don't think I am the only one. The Jacquard loom was "inspired" by this machine and was successful a full sixty years later in part because it required human intervention. Let us also note the punch card mechanism at the top of this 1740's machine. That idea was the mainstay for programming computer in the 1960s.

Cute story 1: According to our tour guide, since the Vaucanson design required only a power source and removed human intervention. Many loom prototypes were destroyed by weavers who could become out of work had the machine been adopted. The story goes that to destroy the looms the workers used their wooden shoes (called sabot in French) and this is why the word sabotage is used when referring to the  destruction of a piece of machinery. 

Cute story 2: Also according to our guide, the expression "être un ane" (being a donkey, a slang for being dumb) is an expression that comes from the fact that skilled weavers were facing being in direct competition with the unskilled labor of a power source that was generally provided by a donkey.




Monday, March 14, 2005

The Saxton Plutonium Program

Back in the early 60's, the U.S. considered using plutonium in nuclear power plants in order to achieve a closed fuel cycle. This program was led by the Atomic Energy Commission (the old name for the current Department of Energy) and consisted in having the national labs and industry in reprocessing some of the plutonium that had been produced in nuclear power plants for use as new  fuel as trials in various nuclear power plants. In 1976, Jimmy Carter decided to not continue this program and reprocessing was never used in the nuclear fuel cycle in the U.S. ever since.

In 1994, five years after the end of the Cold War, there was a sentiment expressed collectively by the National Academy of Sciences to the effect that

....With the end of the Cold War, some 50 tons of excess plutonium resulting from the dismantlement of many thousands of nuclear weapons present "a clear and present danger" to international security that must be dealt with promptly?
Not only the U.S. considered their unused weapons plutonium stockpile to be pretty large but they were also "guessing" that Russia had a similar if not larger sotckpile. The "clear and present danger" reflects in part that most people felt that the Russian stockpile was unprotected. and needed to be protected and destroy. An interaction between the two countries ensued at the technical level whereby it was decided to look into the different ways both countries could destroy this excess weapons plutonium in a way that was acceptable by both countries.

Some of the work I was involved in, was in support of this weapons plutonium disposition issue. We went back to the long list of old government reports on some of the 1960's plutonium programs (in particular the Saxton Plutonium Program) and extracted information that would allow us to benchmark the different computational neutronics codes with these past experiments. With Naeem Abdurrahman and Georgeta Radulescu, we eventually published "Benchmark Calculations of the Saxton Plutonium Program Critical Experiments" in Nuclear Technology ( Vol. 127, (3) pp. 315-331, September 1999).

Printfriendly