IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-00258502.html

Pourquoi et comment légifirer sur l'usure?

Author

Listed:
  • Thierry Baudassé

    (LEO - Laboratoire d'Économie d'Orleans [UMR6586] - UO - Université d'Orléans - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Anne Lavigne

    (LEO - Laboratoire d'Économie d'Orleans [UMR6586] - UO - Université d'Orléans - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

[fre] Depuis que la France connaît une quasi stabilité des prix, les taux d’intérêt nominaux sont situés à des niveaux historiquement bas. Cette situation n’est pas sans conséquence sur la soutenabilité de la réglementation anti-usuraire. En effet, les établissements de crédit soutiennent que, pour certaines catégories de crédit, la tarification «juste «du risque devient impossible : l’addition du coût du risque aux autres composantes de coûts bancaires fait buter certains taux débiteurs sur le taux de l’usure. Ainsi, les établissements seraient contraints de rationner le crédit, alors même que le fonctionnement libre du marché ne les y inciterait pas. De leur côté, les usagers des services bancaires soulignent la nécessité des lois anti-usuraires afin de protéger les populations économiquement fragiles. Entre la législation interdisant l’usure et celle prohibant la vente à perte, la conciliation entre ces intérêts contradictoires est délicate. Est-il souhaitable et possible de modifier le dispositif anti-usuraire en vigueur en France aujourd’hui ? Cet article propose quelques pistes de réponses, en s’attachant exclusivement à examiner la législation anti-usuraire applicable aux particuliers, et non aux entreprises et débouche sur une proposition concrète de dispositif qui concilie les intérêts des prêteurs et des emprunteurs, quel que soit l’environnement macroéconomique. . Classification JEL : E43, G21, G28 [eng] Legislating on Usury : Why and How ? . The French Economy experiences historically low inflation and interest rates. This situation has some consequences on the sustainability of the new usury law that has been enforced in 1990. Banks argue that a fair pricing on credit is nearly impossible : when the cost of risk is added to the other components of the cost of credit, the lending rates bump against the usury rate. Thus banks are constrained to ration credit even though a free competition would not lead them to do so. Consumers on their side advocate for
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • Thierry Baudassé & Anne Lavigne, 2000. "Pourquoi et comment légifirer sur l'usure?," Post-Print halshs-00258502, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00258502
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Denis H. ACCLASSATO, 2008. "Taux D'Interet Effectif, Viabilite Financiere Et Financement Des Petits Operateurs Economiques Par Les Institutions De Microfinance Au Benin," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 79(1), pages 161-195, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • E43 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Money and Interest Rates - - - Interest Rates: Determination, Term Structure, and Effects
    • G21 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Banks; Other Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages
    • G28 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Government Policy and Regulation
    • E43 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Money and Interest Rates - - - Interest Rates: Determination, Term Structure, and Effects
    • G21 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Banks; Other Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages
    • G28 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Government Policy and Regulation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00258502. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.