Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Broken by block 802145 #2147

Closed
shocknet-justin opened this issue Mar 28, 2024 · 6 comments
Closed

Broken by block 802145 #2147

shocknet-justin opened this issue Mar 28, 2024 · 6 comments

Comments

@shocknet-justin
Copy link

shocknet-justin commented Mar 28, 2024

[INF] SYNC: Rejected block 00000000000000000002b6a3bd3d84beb7947a6e73237caba184c25637f3f545 previous block 0000000000000000000114b4228a18d1b914957d2d5dcbc1f1f04209fb325579 is known to be invalid

I just noticed this on a system thats been passively running 23.3, found it was just adding orphans... I updated it to 24 but no joy

Do I need to nuke and start it fresh?

@Roasbeef
Copy link
Member

Duplicate of #2121 ?

23.3 had an issue related to an erroneous Dos parsing limit.

The latest version to be released is v0.24.2: #2136

This fixes a bug introduced with the new UTXO set cache.

@shocknet-justin
Copy link
Author

This node has never been pruned so I don't think its related, also quite a bit earlier in blockheight

@shocknet-justin
Copy link
Author

Just upgraded to 24.2 and it still starts at this same invalid block

@Roasbeef
Copy link
Member

Yeh we don't have reconsiderblock yet (that block is marked in the db as one it rejected, so it won't auto reconsider), but we aim to add it in an upcoming PR. Till then you'll need to re-sync unfortunately. Also see: #2090

Do you have even earlier logs re when the instance first occurred?

@shocknet-justin
Copy link
Author

No problem

Looked for logs but a 1GB dump only went back about a week, full of "Adding orphan block"

@Roasbeef
Copy link
Member

With #2154 merged, you should be able to use reconsiderblock to resolve the issue if you havne't already. In v0.24.2 we fixed a number of bugs related to interactions w/ re-orgs, the utxo cache, and pruning. As mentioend above v0.23.3 has a known issue related to an erroneous DoS parsing limit, so I recommend you update to v0.24.2.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants