Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support customizing data displayed for TUI search #998

Open
lazywei opened this issue May 22, 2023 · 4 comments
Open

Support customizing data displayed for TUI search #998

lazywei opened this issue May 22, 2023 · 4 comments

Comments

@lazywei
Copy link

lazywei commented May 22, 2023

I'm building atuin on HEAD,

This is working as intended

atuin search --format "{time} {command}"

But the following doesn't, it just ignore the specified format

atuin search -i --format "{time} {command}"

Is this expected?

@conradludgate
Copy link
Collaborator

Yes, that is expected. I've been considering changing it to properly respect what flags are supported under interactive or not, but I haven't managed to find a decent solution yet

@lazywei
Copy link
Author

lazywei commented May 22, 2023

Is it possible to allow user supplied a fzf command to the ctrl-r binding? so that the source will coming from atuin while the filtering / UI can be configured by a fzf command and/or fzf opts.
The reason is FZF has already solved a lot of the UI configurability problems and it also provides a lot of flexibility. So it would be great if we can re-use that.

@ellie ellie changed the title atuin search doesn't respect --format when -i is used Support customizing data displayed for TUI search Jul 9, 2024
@atuin-bot
Copy link

This issue has been mentioned on Atuin Community. There might be relevant details there:

https://forum.atuin.sh/t/hostname-in-tui-overview-and-inspector/397/2

@iloveitaly
Copy link
Contributor

My use case here is I don't care about anything other than {command} in my results and would love the tui list to be nice and clean.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants