Militia Act of 1903
The Militia Act of 1903 (32 Stat. 775), also known as "The Efficiency in Militia Act of 1903", also known as the Dick Act, was legislation enacted by the United States Congress which created an early National Guard and codified the circumstances under which the Guard could be federalized. It also provided federal funds to pay for equipment and training, including annual summer encampments. This new entity was to organize units of similar form and quality to those of the regular Army, with intents to meet the same training, education, and readiness requirements as active duty units.[1]
History
During the 19th century, the militia in each U.S. state and territory operated under the Militia Acts of 1792, which was extended by the Militia Act of 1795, which left the question of state versus federal control of the militia unresolved. In consequence, the federal government could not consistently rely on the militias for national defense. For example, during the War of 1812, members of the New York militia refused to take part in operations against the British in Canada, arguing that their only responsibility was to defend their home state.[2] On another occasion, the Governor of Vermont unsuccessfully attempted to recall his state's militia from the defense of Plattsburgh, claiming that it was illegal for them to operate outside Vermont's borders.[3]
As a result, starting in 1812, the federal government would create "volunteer" units when it needed to expand the size of the regular Army. These volunteer units were not militia, though often they would consist of whole militia units which had volunteered en masse, nor were they part of the regular Army. This solution was employed during the Mexican–American War (1846-48),[4] and in the Union Army during the American Civil War (1861-65).[5]
During the Spanish–American War (1898) some volunteer units were organized, most notably the 1st United States Volunteer Cavalry Regiment, nicknamed "Rough Riders."[6][7] The federal government also mobilized several National Guard units which volunteered en masse and were accepted as volunteer units.[8][9]
Several issues with the National Guard became apparent during the Spanish–American War. Units suffered from low levels of training and readiness and there was a lack of standardization in organizational structure, uniforms, equipment, leader qualifications and professional development.[10][11][12]
Root reforms and Dick Act
As a result of the problems identified during the Spanish–American War, Secretary of War Elihu Root and other military leaders took steps to reform the Army, including the National Guard. Root's allies included Charles Dick, Congressman (later Senator) from Ohio and Chairman of the House Militia Affairs Committee, who also served as President of the National Guard Association of the United States.[13] Dick was a veteran of the Spanish–American War and a longtime National Guard member who attained the rank of Major General as commander of the Ohio National Guard.[14][15]
Dick championed the Militia Act of 1903, which became known as the Dick Act. This law repealed the Militia Acts of 1792 and designated the militia (per Title 10 of the U.S. Code, Section 311) as two classes: the Unorganized Militia, which included all able-bodied men between ages 17 and 45, and the Organized Militia, which included state militia (National Guard) units receiving federal support.[16][17][18][19]
The Dick Act included $2 million for National Guard units to modernize equipment, and permitted states to use federal funds to pay for National Guard summer training encampments. The National Guard in each state was also required to carry out a uniform schedule of weekend or weeknight drills and annual summer training camps. In addition, the War Department agreed to fund the attendance of Guard officers at Army schools, and active Army officers would serve as inspectors and instructors of National Guard units. The War Department also agreed to organize joint Regular Army-National Guard exercises and training encampments.[20]
In return, the federal government gained greater control over the National Guard. The President of the United States was empowered to call up the National Guard for up to nine months to repel invasion, suppress rebellion, or enforce federal laws. Guardsmen had to answer a presidential call or face court-martial. States had to organize, equip, and train their units in accordance with the policies and procedures of the Regular Army. If Guard units failed to meet Army standards, they would lose federal recognition and federal funding.[21]
The Dick Act helped resolve the issue of when the United States government could mobilize the National Guard, but federal authorities were not permitted to order the National Guard to service outside the United States.[22]
Amendments
The Dick Act was amended several times. The Militia Act of 1908 removed the nine-month limit on federal service, giving the President the authority to set the length of federal service.[23][24] The ban on National Guard units serving outside the United States was also dropped, though subsequently the United States Attorney General offered his opinion that ordering the National Guard to serve outside the United States was unconstitutional.[25] In addition, the 1908 law stated that during a mobilization the National Guard had to be federalized before the Army could organize volunteer units.[26] The 1908 law also included the creation of the Division of Militia Affairs as the Army agency responsible for overseeing federal training and administrative requirements for the National Guard.[27][28][29][30][31]
The National Defense Act of 1916 doubled the number of required drill periods from 24 to 48 and increased the length of summer training camps from five days to 15.[32] In addition, the War Department was enabled to centrally plan for the National Guard's authorized strength, and the number and types of National Guard units in each state.[33] Under the 1916 law, the War Department was also empowered to implement uniform enlistment contracts and officer commissioning requirements for the National Guard. Guardsmen were also required to take both state and federal enlistment oaths or oaths of office.[34] The 1916 law also replaced the federal subsidy with an annual budget to cover most Guard expenses, including drill pay, and the Division of Militia Affairs was expanded to form the Militia Bureau (now National Guard Bureau).[35][36] In addition, the 1916 law resolved the issues of deploying National Guardsmen overseas by stipulating that they would be discharged as members of the militia and then drafted into federal service, thus removing the National Guard from its status as the militia of the states when operating under federal authority.[37] This provision was employed to call up the National Guard during the Pancho Villa Expedition,[38] and again during World War I.[39]
Other amendments were the National Defense Act of 1920, and the National Defense Act Amendments of 1933.[40] The 1933 act amended the National Defense Act of 1916 to create a separate reserve component of the United States Army called the National Guard of the United States. Since 1933, all National Guardsmen have been members of both their State National Guard and the National Guard of the United States.[41]
Implementation
The improvements to National Guard training and readiness and the resolution of the circumstances under which the National Guard could be federalized led to the call up of National Guard units for service on the Mexico–United States border during the Pancho Villa Expedition.[42][43][44]
In addition, National Guard units were federalized and deployed overseas during World War I.[45]
The improvements to the Army–National Guard relationship, the improvements to National Guard training and readiness, and the National Guard's successful service during the Villa Expedition and the First World War brought about by the Dick Act and subsequent amendments enabled John McAuley Palmer and other National Guard advocates to defeat a 1920 effort to completely replace the National Guard with a federal-only reserve force.[46]
Implementation in the Southern United States
This section may be unbalanced towards certain viewpoints. (March 2018) |
According to Professor Kelley L. Ross of the Los Angeles Valley College, one aspect of the Militia Act of 1903 was a continuation of Jim Crow-era politics, designed primarily to strengthen racist segregation laws by disarming black U.S. citizens,[47] thus making it easier to oppress and subjugate them.[48][49]
This view is supported by author Roger D. Cunningham in his essay "They are as Proud of their Uniform as any who Serve Virginia: African American Participation in the Virginia Volunteers, 1872–1899", part of the book Brothers to the Buffalo Soldiers: Perspectives on the African American Militia and Volunteers, 1865-1917. According to Cunningham, southern white militia units of the 1890s and early 1900s refused to interact with black units from the north, and the governor refused to allow black militia units from Washington, D.C. to take part in commemorations and ceremonies which were held in Virginia.[50]
African American units continued to serve where permitted, including the District of Columbia, Maryland, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Ohio, Illinois, and New York.[51]
See also
References
- ^ Barry M. Stentiford, The American Home Guard: The State Militia in the Twentieth Century, 2002, page 12
- ^ Jesse Greenspan, History.com, How U.S. Forces Failed to Conquer Canada 200 Years Ago, July 12, 2012
- ^ Spencer C. Tucker, The Encyclopedia Of the War Of 1812, 2012, page 132
- ^ Public Broadcasting System, A Call to Arms: The American Army in the Mexican War: An Overview, A Conversation With Richard Bruce Winders, Historian and Curator, The Alamo, March 14, 2006
- ^ Robert K. Krick, Gary W. Gallagher, The American Civil War: The War in the East, 1863-1865, 2001, page 7
- ^ U.S. Army Center of Military History, Spanish–American War: Volunteer Forces, 1899
- ^ Texas State Historical Association, Handbook of Texas Online, First United States Volunteer Cavalry, accessed July 3, 2013
- ^ Spanish–American War Centennial Website, Unit Profiles, Rosters, and Photos, accessed July 3, 2013
- ^ New York Times, The Volunteer Army Call: Further Instructions Issued to the Governors of States by the War Department; MODE OF ENLISTMENT GIVEN System for the Enrollment of the National Guard Organizations Much Simpler Than Had Been Supposed; Replies of the Governors, April 27, 1898
- ^ U.S. War Department, Spanish American War, 1898, Government Documents, 1899, pages 94–95
- ^ Connecticut Adjutant General, Annual Report, 1899, page xxiv
- ^ New York Times, The National Guard, January 1, 1897
- ^ Davenport Weekly Republican, Meeting of National Guard, January 28, 1904
- ^ Ohio General Assembly, Manual of Legislative Practice in the General Assembly of Ohio, 1912, page 199
- ^ Michael Dale Doubler, John W. Listman, Jr., The National Guard: An Illustrated History of America's Citizen-Soldiers, 2007, page 54
- ^ New York Times, For "A Well Regulated Militia", January 30, 1902
- ^ Spokane Daily Chronicle, Secretary Root Interprets Dick Law, May 15, 1903
- ^ Dubuque Telegraph-Herald, Bill Becomes Law: New Law Makes Militia Part of Federal Military Force, January 16, 1903
- ^ United States Government Printing Office, Federal Statutes Annotated, Volume 6, 1918, page 433
- ^ Jerry M. Cooper, Citizens As Soldiers: A History Of The North Dakota National Guard, 2005, page 118
- ^ James A. Drain, Pearson's Magazine, "Getting Ready for Our Next War", April, 1909, page 408
- ^ Derek Avery, Mark Lloyd, History of the United States Fighting Forces, 1989, page 74
- ^ Republican National Committee, Republican Campaign Text-Book, 1908, page 359
Official General Conference Proceedings. Washington, DC: National Guard Association of the United States. 1978. p. 36. - ^ United States House Committee on Government Operations, Subcommittee on Intergovernmental Relations (1958). Hearing Record: Federal-State-Local Relations. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office. p. 1418.
Forte, David F.; Spalding, Matthew (2014). The Heritage Guide to the Constitution: Fully Revised Second Edition. Washington, DC: The Heritage Foundation. p. 184. ISBN 978-1-62157-268-8. - ^ New York Times, The Army-Militia Plan, January 16, 1914
- ^ Edward Marshall, New York Times, Making Our Army More Efficient and Always Ready, March 5, 1911
- ^ Atlanta Constitution, Dick Militia Law Will be Amended, December 15, 1907
- ^ Pittsburgh Press, Discuss Dick Law, July 21, 1907
- ^ Providence News-Democrat, Wants Militia Ready for Instant Service, January 15, 1908
- ^ Charleston News and Courier, Will Not Quit State Militia, October 28, 1907
- ^ Dubuque Telegraph-Herald, General for I.N.G. Is Not Necessary, November 10, 1907
- ^ New York Times, Congress Studies the Militia Bill, February 13, 1916
- ^ Michael D. Doubler, The National Guard and Reserve: A Reference Handbook, 2008, pages 173-176
- ^ New York Times, Old Guardsmen Falter at Oath, June 27, 1916
- ^ New York Times, Says Pay for Guard Adds to Efficiency, May 28, 1916
- ^ United States War Department, Annual Report of the Secretary of War, Volume 1, 1916, page 191
- ^ New York Times, Wilson to Draft Guard, July 10, 1917
- ^ Montreal Daily Mail, U.S. Troops Called for Service on Mexican Border, June 19, 1916
- ^ Christian Science Monitor, President Drafts the National Guard, August 6, 1917
- ^ Official General Conference Proceedings. Washington, DC: National Guard Association of the United States. 1978. p. 36.
The Dick Act of 1903 was followed by the Militia Act of 1908, the National Defense Act of 1916, and some important 1920 amendments, and finally, the National Defense Act of 1933.
United States House Committee on Government Operations, Subcommittee on Intergovernmental Relations (1958). Hearing Record: Federal-State-Local Relations. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office. p. 1418.1. The relationships between the State militia (National Guard) and the Federal Government has been clearly established in various congressional actions starting with the Dict Act of 1903 and other Federal legislation in 1908, 1916, 1920, and 1933. In 1952 Congress restated these policies and that the strength of the National Guard as an integral part of the first line of defense of the Nation must be at all times maintained and assured.
Forte, David F.; Spalding, Matthew (2014). The Heritage Guide to the Constitution: Fully Revised Second Edition. Washington, DC: The Heritage Foundation. p. 184. ISBN 978-1-62157-268-8. - ^ New Jersey Adjutant General, Annual Report, 1933, pages 2-25
- ^ Boston Globe, Testing the National Guard Law, August 8, 1916
- ^ New York Times, Militia Question, February 7, 1916
- ^ National Guard Bureau, Report on Mobilization of the Organized Militia and National Guard, 1916, page 4
- ^ National Guard Educational Foundation, Brief History of Army National Guard Mobilizations Archived 2013-04-15 at archive.today, accessed July 3, 2013
- ^ Russell Frank Weigley, The American Way of War, 1977, pages 221–222
- ^ Ross, Kelley L. (February 2018). "What Is Called 'Gun Control'". Political Economy. The Proceedings of the Friesian School, Fourth Series. Archived from the original on 2018-02-17. Retrieved February 17, 2018.
1903, when the National Guard was created to prevent black people from owning guns or being able to defend themselves. Since the motive of creating the National Guard and allowing the Constitutionally mandated Militia to lapse was pure racism...
- ^ Ross, Kelley L. (August 2000). "I Am A Union Man". Retrieved December 23, 2015.
- ^ Ross, Kelley L. (March 18, 2016). "The Kind of Libertarian I Am". Political Economy. The Proceedings of the Friesian School, Fourth Series. Archived from the original on May 22, 2017. Retrieved March 17, 2016.
One of the very worst effects of Segregation for the freedom of all Americans is one that I have never even seen mentioned [...] The Dick Act of 1903, which abolished the traditional Militia and instituted the National Guard, is certainly a manifestation of Segregation. No Southern State wanted its black citizens to be trained and armed with military weapons, let alone have them "keep and bear" the arms on their own recognizance. Black people might have actually been able to resist the judicial and extra-judicial Terrorism of the Segregationist regimes in that case.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link) - ^ Glasrud, Bruce A., editor (2011). Brothers to the Buffalo Soldiers: Perspectives on the African American Militia and Volunteers, 1865–1917. Columbia, MO: University of Missouri Press. pp. 63–64. ISBN 978-0-8262-1904-6.
When the Dick Act increased federal oversight of the National Guard, making it difficult for states to discriminate against black units, some states chose to disband them rather than issuing new arms and equipment.
{{cite book}}
:|first=
has generic name (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ Scott, Emmett Jay (1919). Scott's Official History of the American Negro in the World War. Chicago, Illinois: Homewood Press. pp. 33–34.
national guard negro illinois maryland new york.
External links
- William M. Donnelly. "The Root Reforms and the National Guard". United States Army. Retrieved September 13, 2009.
- Dick Act at Snopes.com
- Parker, James (1903). The Militia Act of 1903. New York, NY: North American Review.
- Heaton, Dan (June 2015). "The Patriarch: The 1903 law that transformed the separate state militias into the National Guard was the work of a real soldier-politician". National Guard. Washington, DC: National Guard Association of the United States. Retrieved March 13, 2018.