Wednesday, 29 April 2020 03:03 pm
elsewhence: (tailor of gloucester)
i guess that with the masks finished, the next larger project i will invest my energy in is a regency dress, with a small dose of choli because in my impression regency bodices actually fit surprisingly similarly to cholis. it sure would be nice if that freedom of movement carried over! i'll just do my best to not focus on whether i actually get around to finishing anything. sometimes, the journey is the destination.

Saturday, 25 April 2020 06:25 pm
elsewhence: (invent the universe)
all women's masks and one men's mask finished. i feel pretty motivated right now! once they're all finished i'll get all fancy, wrap each batch in tissue paper, tape the appropiate gender label on and put them in one of the leftover boxes from when i built my nail polish storage. i think a fancy presentation might result in more money than originally planned and it doesn't cost me anything i didn't already spend ages ago

ideally, this will all be done by tomorrow afternoon to evening so someone can come collect it, apparently one of my cousins will need his by monday

Friday, 24 April 2020 03:17 am
elsewhence: (Default)
so fun fact, my interest in historic clothing started entirely with the fact that i coincidentally ran across a regency dress pattern while looking for something totally different and it reminded me of princess serenity's dress from sailor moon, which i loved. so i did more research on regency era clothing, which exposed me to clothing from other eras too... i learned how to make regency era clothing, and then how to make modern clothing, i went through a three-year apprenticeship as an apparel tailor and learned to do it more professionally and efficiently, and then i taught myself pattern drafting on a level way beyond what was part of the apprenticeship (which isn't much, apparel tailor is the industrial side of the garment making profession, so you don't need to know how to draft patterns for individual bodies)...

ultimately, the fact that i'm sewing high-quality face masks right now is down to the fact that i liked sailor moon when i was a teenager. causality is honestly beautiful.

Tuesday, 21 April 2020 06:33 pm
elsewhence: (Default)


fabric for the masks that my uncle's family asked for, cut out and ready to sew. i used fabric i already had on hand, so i picked raw cotton for the lining, that's the darker stuff. also the first batch of elastic. they originally asked for eight masks, which would have required around 5 m of elastic, i ordered that straight away so it'd arrive as quickly as possible (our postal service is kind of bogged down right now, what with everyone staying at home and ordering their stuff online instead), then he sent another email asking whether i would be willing and able to add another two masks, so i needed to order more elastic. oh well, they're the ones who pay for the materials (including shipping where required)...

the pack of filing strips is there because the metal strips can be used to make the top edge of the mask conform to your face better. you can also buy metal strips made specifically for that purpose now, but they cost ~15€ plus shipping for a pack of 100 and a pack of 50 filing strips cost 1.29€, sooo

Friday, 17 April 2020 02:35 pm
elsewhence: (look out of the window)
i'm prescient, my uncle just sent my father a mail asking whether i'd be willing to sew 8 masks for his family (two masks each for four people, uncle and his wife and their adult children) in return for adequate payment. don't even know what to ask for beyond material costs (which will add up to a bit less than 20€) though, it's not as if i desperately need more money. but yeah i will do it, i trust him to understand that these homemade masks offer far more protection to others than to your own self, he accepts that because my energy levels fluctuate all the tie it could take me a bit longer to finish everything and he also knows i will need to order the elastic online. (though adding the elastic is literally the last step, so i can get started well before that arrives.)

so that'll be four masks for men and four for women. lots of fabric to cut, considering that the model i favour has a fitting seam down the middle and a lining and thus has four pieces each (you can theoretically put in a disposable filter too if you have suitable material, and a wire to help confirm the top edge to the shape of the face better, but i'll leave that be, it can be added after the fact if they deem it necessary). i should ask for some money for the work itself just because of that.

Monday, 6 April 2020 02:40 am
elsewhence: (r2-d2 surprised)
removed 5 cm total from the choli's bust width, tapering to nothing at the bottom edge, which automatically also removed 2.5 cm from each sleeve, and the choli fits so well now. also, its bust width and underbust have become identical to my own. so yeah, i probably caused the problem with a measurement error - i assumed they wanted me to use the full bust measurement because what pattern company doesn't and therefore didn't even check the measuring instructions, but they actually want you to use the high bust. which is 2'' (which happens to be almost exactly 5 cm) smaller than the full bust in almost all commercial patterns. size 34 might've fit almost perfectly right off the bat. too bad i've already bought all patterns that interested me.

and i'm still astonished by just how freely these sleeves let me move my arms! i hope i don't break them in the process of trying to make them look better. even though realistically speaking, it's not as if i couldn't just print a new copy of the original pattern

Sunday, 5 April 2020 04:23 pm
elsewhence: (invent the universe)
tested the "normal cut" choli pattern i bought from blouse guru and am quite happy. i really can move my arms incredibly freely and the shoulders have made no attempt to fall off my body so far. i won't post any pictures though because i managed to be stupid and cut two identical fronts despite checking multiple times, so now one's wrong side out. doesn't matter for a mockup obviously, but it still looks dumb and not worthy of someone who's had the amount of professional training i've had.

if these patterns are all this good, and yet so affordable (at least by our standards)... man, i really hope the prices make for decent earnings in indian terms. the people behind this site deserve it.

issues: seems like as is, the bust measurement and the bicep are too large. i may just plain have measured incorrectly and picked the wrong size though, or it's because my breasts are unusually small. so, take the whole thing in where needed and see whether that improves the fit. also, i still want to try and modify it using my personal block and see what that looks like. especially the special backwards-pitched sleeve and armscye - i spent what probably adds up to days of my life perfecting these, at a point when i already knew that my time was running out, i want them to see some kind of use...

i generally feel so good about doing stuff that isn't just passively browsing the internet. and even being able to do so in the first place. i'll make the most of what time i have left.

Thursday, 30 January 2020 02:01 am
elsewhence: (silly ikea person)
now i get to find out whether i have the skills to repair real fur. bought what's supposedly a mink jacket (i honestly don't care what precisely it is, just that it is very nice and soft) for 16€ including shipping. looked fine on the pictures, the seller had written that they were selling it as crafts material, i assumed that they'd done so because they didn't think anyone would actually want to wear vintage fur as is. but in real life, there's a Y-shaped 10 cm tear on the lower right of the back that wasn't visible on the pictures. i guess the seller might've purposely laid it out in a way that hid the damage, but in any case i don't feel like chasing after them and trying to get my money back on something that i didn't pay much for in the first place, so repair attempt it is...

i guess the best approach would probably be use a thread in a very closely matched colour, use a handsewn butted seam and hope that the hairs are long enough to hide the stitches

Saturday, 13 July 2019 06:55 pm
elsewhence: (invent the universe)
hmmm, a well-fitted bodiced petticoat would probably also help define the shape of the bust and underbust some more. i mean, some people who value strict accuracy even less than i do use fitted bodiced petticoats as their only layer under regency dresses, and it can look quite decent. my stays do support my bust pretty well, but additional support can't hurt. it would have to be without a closure or maybe with a hook and eye one though - drawstrings leave a gap between neckline and underbust so they don't create enough tension to lift and reshape the bust, buttons are far too bulky and would show through any dress that is worn on top

Friday, 12 July 2019 10:29 pm
elsewhence: (silly ikea person)
okay, so do i want to stick with "fuck total period accuracy, i just want the result to look plausible" approach and make a bodiced petticoat with no closure at all? i know from experience that i would still be able to wiggle into it - i learned that when i made my first bodiced petticoat with a back tie closure, then found i didn't actually have to bother with untying the strings and trying to wrangle them closed behind my back. so later i just made one with no closure at all, the smooth uninterrupted surface all around looked very nice. i think it probably works because my breasts aren't that large and because even woven fabrics still have a little stretch to them...

(both chemise and stays are finished now, but i don't want to take pictures until i get around to having my hair cut. it keeps covering my eyes and ears and the nape of my neck now, ew. i hate even slightly long hair.)

Sunday, 7 July 2019 03:00 am
elsewhence: (silly ikea person)
hmm maybe i will just make a regency petticoat with straps this time... there's not actually much historic precedent for the popular kind of bodiced petticoat (one of the extant examples has sleeves so it's probably actually meant to be worn under a net dress and can't really be considered underwear, one has an embroidered hem so it was likely also intended to be seen, one has a quite low waist and is probably actually from the 1820s...) and the bodice of my sheer dress will be lined anyway. i kind of suspect that what most of what we've come to consider bodiced petticoats was actually the kind of meant-to-be-seen petticoat that goes with an open robe, not the underwear kind

Friday, 5 July 2019 11:38 pm
elsewhence: (arkanoid and vaus)
okay, i can still lace myself into back-lacing stays, i made the right choice there. just hurts my shoulder a bit, and it'd still be useful if someone else helped me adjust the width of the lacing gap. i also made the right choice in trying them on before finishing the binding - it looks like maybe it would be better to put some boning in the centre front as well, i'm getting some horizontal wrinkles the mockup didn't have (it had boning in the centre front by necessity because it closed at centre front), and also to shorten the top fabric a little... i'm going to just duct tape some cable ties to the lining to test whether that's likely to help, it would be much easier to undo if necessary

Thursday, 4 July 2019 12:08 am
elsewhence: (Default)
i make the fucking effort to hand baste the bias tape in place, now it turns out that the machine with the right foot for accurate topstitching won't feed the material properly and the machine that would probably do it doesn't have a suitable foot?? you can't be fucking serious, people have made much more involved stays and corsets using machines that are much newer and much less sturdy

(and if i intended to hand sew the damn stuff, the basting that's already in place now would actually only get in the way)

Tuesday, 2 July 2019 11:08 pm
elsewhence: (arkanoid and vaus)
i just learned - and am greatly interested by - the fact that apparently these late 1790s crossover dresses that are my main inspiration were, in fact, considered robes a la turque. even though they don't look very much like earlier robes a la turque. then again, i suppose we don't have a problem with the fact that this and this were both referred to as chemise dresses within their respective eras...

anyway i finally found a good way to baste the bias tape on my stays. use actual basting thread and a relatively short needle (both things i've never bothered with before), press the bias tape in half beforehand, use a short gathering thread in the middle of the bias tape to help ease it around each u-turn. i thought the gathering thread thing would take up a lot of additional time, but compared to the time it takes to get the tape to look halfway neat without them, it's honestly not that bad...

Saturday, 29 June 2019 03:45 am
elsewhence: (Default)
how on earth did i bind the tabs on these (inaccurate) short regency stays i made ages ago? i can only remember thinking "oh that was easy, why do people complain about this so much", whereas right now i'm just thinking "WHY"

Friday, 21 June 2019 10:46 pm
elsewhence: (Default)
straps pinned back to the correct length and worn with the chemise rather than a modern t-shirt, the 1790s stays mockup works even better. it does shape a lower bustline than i intended, more like a modern bra, but after looking at some fashion plates, that's actually correct for the era. you don't get the look where the empire waist - rather than the fullest point of the bust - is halfway between shoulder and elbow until some time into the actual regency, and i suppose it's just not actually possible to do without the longer, more structured lift-and-seperate stays. so i'm really just getting exactly the same thing women got back then

Friday, 21 June 2019 02:53 am
elsewhence: (r2-d2 surprised)
got it. cut the centre front piece of the stays on the true bias and all other pieces on the straight grain, and in combination with a pattern a little smaller than your natural measurements, you get a nice smooth fit. no boning except the pieces next to the lacing edges. the full bust is slightly larger because it's hoisted higher on the ribcage where the back is wider, the underbust is larger because you don't get the sharp break at the underbust level that you get with modern undergarments or later regency stays (so part of the breast tissue is mushed into the underbust) the waist is unchanged. no need to muck about with weird nonstandard grainlines, though i can see why bernhardt did it (partial bias has almost the same properties as true bias but uses less fabric, i believe it was used in 18th century bodices too). i've never worked with the true bias before, but it's my new best friend. and the way it fits isn't anything like what you'd expect from historic support garments, either! honestly it actually feels less restrictive than a modern longline bra!

now i just need to decide whether i really want a centre back lacing. it would look much nicer, but while i was able to lace myself into long regency stays at one point, it is really annoying to do. i also found that laced-on straps are actually functional, but that the reason they're functional means i should possibly plan a gap between the end of the strap and the top edge of the centre front - they've stretched out by more than a centimetre. maybe it's because the mockup fabric is thin and also wasn't prewashed, but i'm still wary...

Wednesday, 19 June 2019 11:14 pm
elsewhence: (Default)
so, a stays mockup with minimal boning creates a nice shape and is quite comfortable, but the fronts cut on the straight grain wrinkle like hell. that's not something different fabric will fix. i would probably need to mess around with the grainlines if i wanted to avoid additional boning...

at least the rest of it looks fine

Wednesday, 19 June 2019 02:14 am
elsewhence: (invent the universe)
the buttonholer's really useful for making eyelets on a mockup, too! i know people usually make lacing strips with grommets for corset mockups, but that kind of only makes sense if you're certain you're going to make more than one. if you aren't, well, twenty machine-sewn eyelets probably take less time to make than a lacing strip....

note to self though, use a brand-name needle and brand-name thread for buttonholes or the friction will cause the thread to break all the time

Monday, 17 June 2019 02:34 pm
elsewhence: (invent the universe)
i do wonder how much boning my stays will actually need. it's not as if i particularly want to sew lots of boning channels, or hand bind edges that i can't machine bind because there's boning in them. there's this, which works fine with almost none at all. i do want to retain the 1780s seam lines and bust shape (without bust gussets), though...

oh, this fits fine with almost no boning too. nice. just two bones next to each row of lacing holes. i guess i should just make a fabric mockup and see

also come to think of it i made regency stays without boning once, just two layers of fabric. some cording next to the seams, but not nearly as much as period examples, so it probably didn't affect the fit much. they worked just fine, though the edge next to the lacing holes buckled a lot when it was laced up, that probably would have worked better with boning...

Profile

elsewhence: (Default)
kay jorin

Most Popular Tags