brithistorian: (Default)

Every field has certain works that everyone working the field is expected to be familiar with. In art history, one of those is Walter Benjamin's 1935 essay "The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction."

Every field also has students who make it all the way through their degree program without actually reading those fundamental works. In this case, that would be me. I absorbed the major points of Benjamin's essay from seeing it repeatedly mentioned in other works I read (particularly the idea of the "aura," or as I prefer to call it "the cult of the original") and skipped actually reading it. But when I saw it referenced in Jordan S. Carroll's Hugo Award-winning book Speculative Whiteness: Science Fiction and the Alt-Right (2025, Best Related Work), I decided the time had come to actually read it.

I think it was worth reading. It did have quite a lot on the "aura," which I was already aware of, but it also contained a lot of material on film, surrealism, Dada, Futurism, and the differing ways that art was politicized in fascism and communism. I found the following quote, about the relationship between captions and photographs, and then how this is also related to movies, to be particularly interesting.

[Since the introduction of photography], captions have become obligatory. And it is clear that they have an altogether different character than the title of a painting. The directives which the captions give to those looking at pictures in illustrated magazines soon become even more explicit and more imperative in the film[,] where the meaning of each single picture appears to be prescribed by the sequence of all preceding ones.

ETA: The lines that Carroll was referencing come from the penultimate sentences of Benjamin's essay, where he says "[Mankind's] self-alienation has reached such a degree that it can experience its own destruction as an aesthetic pleasure of the first order. This is the situation of politics which Fascism is rendering aesthetic." The ultimate sentence, which Carroll doesn't mention (or at least hasn't so far) is "Communism responds by politicizing art."

brithistorian: (Default)

Today I finally got around to watching the trailer for the new Fantastic Four movie. I am absolutely jaw-dropped and looking forward to seeing this movie, which I never really expected to be. It's as if someone at Marvel read my post from last year about why previous Fantastic Four movies hadn't really worked well and taken my ideas to heart. I don't think I can ever recall a studio making the movie I wanted them to make!

brithistorian: (Default)
A., L., and I watched Transformers One today, at L.'s request. If you're not familiar with it, it's a 2024 animated Transformers movie that's a prequel/AU to the main run of Transformers movie. Much to my surprise, I thought it was really, really good. The animation looked great. I can't tell too much of the story without utterly spoiling the surprises in it, but I can say that it was really good and particularly relevant to this moment in time. There were a lot of Easter eggs calling back to earlier Transformers movies/shows. Most interesting, in my opinion, there were no humans! The entire thing took plan on/in Cybertron, well before the Transformers became aware of Earth. I thought that was really good and interesting — I'd like to see more SF where humans aren't the center of the universe.
brithistorian: (Default)
Tonight, as part of celebrating Z.'s 30th birthday, we watched 13 Going on 30 (at her request). As the credits were rolling, I happened to glance over just as the song credits started rolling by. Once of the songs used in the movie was Vanilla Ice's "Ice Ice Baby." Because of the sample from "Under Pressure," David Bowie and the members of Queen all got songwriting credits on "Ice Ice Baby." Whoever wrote up the credits for 13 Going on 30 put all the songwriters in alphabetical order, so it reads "Written by David Bowie, John Deacon. . ."

brithistorian: (Default)
Welcome to Write Every Day (WED) day #26!

Today’s historical events included two events that caught my eye this morning. They both have great possibilities as settings for historical fiction. In fact, I know one of them has been, and the other one probably has been, just not so much in English.

The A-side, big name event for today comes from 1881: The Gunfight at the OK Corral. Tombstone is my favorite fictional adaptation of this — Val Kilmer as Doc Holliday just can’t be beat!

The deep cut comes from 1597: During the Imjin War (Japanese invasions of Korea, 1592-1598), at the Battle of Myeongnyang, Korean Admiral Yi Sun-sin manages to defeat the 300 ships of the Japanese navy, despite only having 13 ships on his side. In 2014, it was the basis of the movie The Admiral: Roaring Currents starring Choi Min-sik. (In the US, the movie is available for rental from Amazon Prime Video or Apple TV, or for purchase on Amazon Prime Video, Blu-ray or DVD.

Have a great day!

Links:


Day 26: [personal profile] badly_knitted, [personal profile] brithistorian, [personal profile] calimac, [personal profile] china_shop, [personal profile] cornerofmadness, [personal profile] lunabee34, [personal profile] luzula, [personal profile] sanguinity, [personal profile] shadaras, [personal profile] stonepicnicking_okapi, [personal profile] sylvanwitch, [personal profile] trobadora, [personal profile] yasaman,

Day 25: [personal profile] badly_knitted, [personal profile] brithistorian, [personal profile] china_shop, [personal profile] calimac, [personal profile] cornerofmadness, [personal profile] lunabee34, [personal profile] luzula, [personal profile] sanguinity, [personal profile] shadaras, [personal profile] stonepicnicking_okapi, [personal profile] sylvanwitch, [personal profile] trobadora, [personal profile] yasaman,

Day 24: [personal profile] badly_knitted, [personal profile] brithistorian, [personal profile] china_shop, [personal profile] cornerofmadness, [personal profile] lunabee34, [personal profile] luzula, [personal profile] sanguinity, [personal profile] shadaras, [personal profile] sylvanwitch, [personal profile] trobadora, [personal profile] yasaman, [personal profile] ysilme

Day 23: [personal profile] badly_knitted, [personal profile] brithistorian, [personal profile] calimac, [personal profile] china_shop, [personal profile] cornerofmadness, [personal profile] lunabee34, [personal profile] luzula, [personal profile] sanguinity, [personal profile] shadaras, [personal profile] sylvanwitch, [personal profile] trobadora, [personal profile] ysilme

Day 22: [personal profile] badly_knitted, [personal profile] brithistorian, [personal profile] calimac, [personal profile] carenejeans, [personal profile] china_shop, [personal profile] cornerofmadness, [personal profile] lunabee34, [personal profile] luzula, [personal profile] sanguinity, [personal profile] shadaras, [personal profile] sylvanwitch, [personal profile] trobadora, [personal profile] yasaman, [personal profile] ysilme

Day 21: [personal profile] badly_knitted, [personal profile] brithistorian, [personal profile] calimac, [personal profile] carenejeans, [personal profile] china_shop, [personal profile] cornerofmadness, [personal profile] lunabee34, [personal profile] luzula, [personal profile] sanguinity, [personal profile] shadaras, [personal profile] stonepicnicking_okapi, [personal profile] sylvanwitch, [personal profile] trobadora, [personal profile] yasaman, [personal profile] ysilme

Days 1-20 behind cut )
brithistorian: (Default)
Welcome to Write Every Day (WED) day #6!

Today’s historical tidbit was rather hard to choose — the events listed for today were all either uninteresting or unpleasant. There were a couple of near-firsts, though I think they would have been more interesting if they could have been actual first, without the weasel words: (emphasis mine) “1600 — Eurydice, the oldest surviving opera, receives its première performance, beginning the Baroque period.” and “1927 – Opening of The Jazz Singer, the first prominent "talkie" movie.” Also, in the list of people born on a day, I was struck by the interesting combination of professions for ”Alice Timander, Swedish dentist and actress” (1915-2007). She sounds like an interesting person, and her entry is fairly brief — you should check it out!

Have a great day!

Links:


Day 6: [personal profile] badly_knitted, [personal profile] brithistorian, [personal profile] calimac, [personal profile] carenejeans, [personal profile] chanter1944, [personal profile] china_shop, [personal profile] cornerofmadness, [personal profile] lunabee34, [personal profile] luzula, [personal profile] sanguinity, [personal profile] shadaras, [personal profile] sylvanwitch, [personal profile] trobadora, [personal profile] yasaman, [personal profile] ysilme

Days 1-5 behind cut )
brithistorian: (Default)
A. and I just finished watching the 2024 Road House remake. We're big fans of the original, so we went into it expecting very little from it and, when all is said and done, it failed to live up to even our extremely low expectations. There were a few brief snippets that showed the potential to be a better movie, and they were all in the trailer. A few of the minor characters were mildly amusing, but none of the major characters had anything even approaching a personality. Seriously, toward the end I realized that I had no way of saying if any of the characters were acting out of character because none of them were cohesive, internally consistent characters.

You can tell that a lot of effort went into making this movie -- if nothing else, the amount of work that Jake Gyllenhaal had to put in to bulk up for this role was impressive -- but in the end it just wasn't a good movie. At all. Fortunately, it was only an hour and a half, so I didn't invest a lot of time in it, but I ended up finishing it just because I was curious to see what sort of ending they managed to end up with.

It wasn't even bad in a "so bad it's good" way. It was just bad. The trailer was good. Go watch the trailer. But don't let it trick you into believing the movie is anywhere as good as the trailer.

At this point, if someone told me that the script for this was what they got when they fed an AI the screenplay of the original movie and told it to write a reboot, I would not have a bit of trouble believing it. (If nothing else, the writers did a really crappy job of keeping track of "what does which character know?", because often two characters would appear on the screen together for the first time and yet somehow they would already know things about each other that they had absolutely no way at all of knowing.)

brithistorian: (Default)
Marvel announces the cast for their latest Fantastic Four movie.

Obviously they didn't ask my opinion. If they had, I would have told them that the reason they keep having problems with Fantastic Four movies isn't because they're choosing the wrong cast or wrong director or wrong writers. The problem is that the Fantastic Four are very much Of Their Time and (IMO) cannot work if transposed to a modern setting. The Fantastic Four debuted in 1961, and the whole series, from concept to execution, relies on that Space Race-era sense of techno-optimism in order to work. Having seen the way the tech industry actually played out, the Fantastic Four seems hopelessly naive and cartoonish, and that's why the movies keep not working right.
brithistorian: (Default)
So I was playing around with my ukulele this morning, and I was like "Wait a second - those chords sound familiar!" And that's when I realized: The Legend of Zelda main theme uses the same chord progression as "Science Fiction Double Feature" from Rocky Horror!
brithistorian: (Default)
Today I ran across an article on Lifehacker "25 of the Most Obscenely Patriotic Movies ever." I was surprised to see that I hadn't seen them all. Of course Rocky IV was on the list. This was one of my favorite movies growing up, and I considered watching it, but I realized there were just a few parts I actually wanted to see. So I watched those bits on YouTube, then decided to post them here, in case any of you hadn't seen the movie - I can save you 72 minutes by showing you the 19 minutes that are worth watching:

The training montage:

The big fight at the end:

And Rocky's speech after the big fight:







brithistorian: (Default)
Tonight A. and  watched Ghosted (2023), available in the US on Apply TV. It starred Ana de Armas, Chris Evans, and Adrian Brody and was really a lot of run. It's a rom-com/spy movie/action film that's a lot of fun so long as you don't take it at all serious. He's a beekeeper, she's a CIA agent. They meet at the farmer's market and after one date, he gets accidentally sucked into her world. Hijinks ensue. Cameos by Tim Blake Nelson, Amy Sedaris, John Cho, Anthony Mackie, Sebastian Stan, and Ryan Reynolds, among others, provide bonus fun.
brithistorian: (Default)
Tonight A. and Z. and I watched a movie together. (L. watched the trailer but decided not to watch the movie.) Afterward, as I was loading and starting the dishwasher and putting away the leftovers and writing when they'd be good until on the pad on the front of the fridge, it occurred to me: I feel like I've finally adapted to not being in school." And my first thought was "About damn time. It took you four months!" And then I thought about it some more, and thought "After spending 5-1/2 years in school, I was able to adapt to such  major change in my life in only 4 months. That's not bad!" (And then as I was writing this, I had to reframe. I had been thinking "It took me this long to learn this!" but then I reframed as "At least I learned it.")

One of the projects I had set aside for "after I graduate" is that I had my old laptop down in the basement and Z. had installed Ubuntu on it for me, but the battery wouldn't hold a charge and the keyboard wouldn't work properly. (As it turns out, being able to type the number 4 is pretty necessary.) Earlier this week, I found it and brought it upstairs (and marveled at how heavy it is compared to my new computer) and started trying to fix it. I was able to get the battery to charge. (All I had to do was remove the battery, hold down the power key for 30 seconds, then put the battery back in and plug it in until it charged. Then I learned how to remove the keyboard. I cleaned it out as best I could and it worked somewhat better, but still not well enough to actually use. But I learned where to buy a new keyboard for it and once it arrives (in about a week), I'll be able to install it and I should have a working Ubuntu laptop!

ETA:
 I just realized someone is probably going to ask what movie we watched. We watched Bros. It was a great gay rom-com. There was one moment where I had to leave the room for a moment because I was getting overwhelmed with secondhand embarrassment for the protagonist, but all in all we really enjoyed it.

ETA2: When I was looking over this post after the last edit, I realized that the title is an inadvertent quote from Queen's "I'm Going Slightly Mad," so enjoy:



brithistorian: (Default)
Earlier this summer, K-pop group Billlie[1] came out a song called "Patbingsu" (video below).



What I want you to have noticed in this video is the scene where a girl is at a party and another girl comes up behind her and puts headphones on her. If you keep up with K-pop videos, either directly or through watching the videos I post here, this scene will likely look very familiar: You will have seen it in Twice's "What Is Love?" video.[2] But the scene originally comes from a 1980 French film called La Boum[3] (released in English as The Party). Apparently that scene is the Korean cultural equivalent of John Cusack playing a boombox outside Ione Skye's window. I don't exactly know how it came to be that this particular French movie became popular enough in Korea that people are still visually quoting it 42 years later, but I think it's awesome. 

[1] That's not a typo - there are actually supposed to be 3 L's in the middle of the name.
[2] And if you're at all a film fan and haven't seen "What Is Love?", go watch it now. You owe it to yourself.
[3] They also named a K-pop group after the movie.
brithistorian: (Default)
A. and I just watched the Hulu original movie The Princess. It was. . . an experience. Here's what I wrote about it in my APAzine:

This is a fun and entertaining movie, but I doubt anyone would call it a good movie. Joey Fisher plays “The Princess” (seriously, that’s the only name she’s ever given), who has been trained in martial arts (because reasons) and now must fight her way through a long string of action-movie tropes (and a veritable army of bad guys) in order to save “The King,” “The Queen,” and her younger sister Violet (apparently the only one in the family with a name) from Julius, who seeks to become king by marrying her, but if that falls through, he’s perfectly willing to attempt to usurp the throne. It takes place in a castle in a medieval-ish kingdom - not any particular kingdom or any particular time in the Middle Ages, mind you: clothes, weapons, and armor are drawn from hundreds of years, multiple continents, and several bad fantasy novels. Worth watching once, so long as you don’t expect too much.
brithistorian: (Default)
A., the kids, and I all watched Turning Red together last night. I loved it. I don't know what's up with animated films bringing me to tears recently, but this one did too. 

As I was watching it, from time to time I'd think about the conservatives to said that the movie was "unrelatable." These people (and I hate dignifying them with that word, but I suppose biologically they're entitled to it) either have a critical failure of empathy or else they're being deliberately obtuse in order to make a political point. (I know where my money is.) Seriously, though: While there might be parts of this movie that hit harder if you're an Asian female, or there might be some small details that would only be meaningful if you're Asian or female or both, there is no way that this movie as a whole is unrelatable to any adult living in America today. Even if you've never experienced these particular things yourself, you'll be familiar enough with them either from the people you know or else from experiences you've seen portrayed in movies or on TV.

As far as I'm concerned, with Turning Red, Pixar has knocked it out of the park again. 

Busiest day

Mar. 4th, 2022 10:39 pm
brithistorian: (Default)
  • Today was the first and longest day of interviews/assessments for the new museum studies professor. I had to be on campus at 10 a.m. for the student interview and back at 3:30 for the teaching demonstration. It was a very interesting process, and I'm looking forward to the rest of it.
  • For lunch I used Google Maps to find the nearest Burger King. I got there only to discover that the dining room was closed, so I had to go through the drive-through and then sit in the parking lot and eat in the van. Looking around while I ate, I figured out that I wasn't in the best part of town when I saw that I was in the parking lot of a shopping center with a tobacco shop and a pawn shop that was across the street from a shopping center with a tobacco shop and a pawn shop.
  • Once I finished eating, I went to the Caribou Coffee across the parking lot, got an iced mocha, and sat down to read for a while before heading back to campus. While I was there, I couldn't help overhearing the staff talking, where I heard this gem that I'm still trying to figure out exactly what she meant and/or why she said it this way: "We used to go there every other two weeks." Is she trying to say every two weeks and just being redundant (maybe witching from "every other week" to "every two weeks" mid-stream) or does she really mean every four weeks (in which case why not say "every four week"?). Language is a funny thing.
  • Speaking of language, I've been thinking about Braille lately. I'm fascinated by the systems of Braille in different languages. Most languages written in the Latin alphabet use a version of Braille based on the international standard, but varying (sometimes greatly) depending on special characters used in the language. Likewise, Cyrillic and Hebrew Braille are based on international standard.[1] Then, there are Chinese, Korean, and Japanese Brailles that have no relation to the international standard. But they all use the same 6-dot Braille matrix.[2] Which got me to thinking: If a blind person was confronted with a Braille document that they didn't know what language it was in, their only chance of figuring out what language it's in is by trying to read it in each Braille they know![3] This is just mind-blowing to me: That there is no Braille equivalent of how a sighted person can often look at a document and recognize what language it's printed in even if they don't speak the language.
  • While driving today, I saw a vacuum cleaner store[4] called "Vac That Thang Up"! ^_^
  • Also while driving today, I saw a car with a bumper sticker that said "People who don't understand sarcasm are great!"
  • Yet another movie remake that nobody asked for: They're remaking White Men Can't Jump. Why?
[1] I think Hebrew is particularly well-suited for Braille because of the way the lines alternate direction, so you're not faced with making sure you've correctly identified the correct next line.
[2] There are also expanded English and Japanese Brailles that use an 8-dot matrix, but we're ignoring those for the moment.
[3] This task would be hard enough on level 1 (fully-written out) Braille, but would then be orders of magnitude harder on level 2 (standard abbreviations) or level 3 (personalized abbreviations) Braille.
[4] I had no idea vacuum cleaner stores were still a thing!
brithistorian: (Default)
L. has been insisting for a while now that A. and I needed to see Coco. We decided tonight would be a good night to watch it. When we started it, I wasn't altogether into the idea of watching a movie tonight, but within 15 minutes I was drawn in and by the end I was crying. What an awesome movie! If you haven't seen it, I highly recommend it. I really can't say anything more about it here, because so much of the movie's effect comes from the discovery process. With that in mind, if you haven't seen it, please don't read the comments to this post, so you don't spoil yourself. 
brithistorian: (Default)
I was at the Disney+ website this morning (trying to find out if their Korean show "Rookie Cops" was going to be released in America - no answer, so I asked them on Twitter), and I noticed that one of the sections of movies of movies was labeled "Rediscover These Classics." I was kind of surprised to see that the first movie in the section was "Caravan of Courage" (AKA "The Ewok Adventure"). I was 11 when this movie came out, and a total Star Wars nut. But I don't think I would have called this movie a "classic" even then! ^_^

In other news, I don't seem to be having an ill effects from my booster yesterday. I might be having some low energy, but that could just as easily be because it's early in the morning and I haven't finished my first cup of coffee. If I'm still feeling down by lunchtime, then I'll chalk it up to side effects. But even if it is, if this is as bad as it gets, then I think I'm getting off pretty easy.

For some music this morning, I give you Bite Me Bambi's cover of The Go-Go's "Our Lips Are Sealed."

brithistorian: (Default)
Right now as I start typing this post it's 10:15 p.m., so an hour and 45 minutes to the start of 2022. But some of are already in 2022, so spoil it for me: Is 2022 better than 2021? Even after having known about time zones since practically forever, it still kind of boggles my mind to think that in Korea it's already after 1:00 tomorrow afternoon!

A. and I just finished watching It's Kind of a Funny Story. A few days ago I got a marketing email highlighting some of the movies that will be leaving Amazon Prime soon, and when I saw this on the list, I remembered that I had wanted to see it when it first came out but hadn't gotten around to it. Since this seemed like as good a time as any, we watched it this evening. The capsule plot summary (a suicidal teen checks into a mental hospital, meets a variety of people, and gains a new perspective on his life) doesn't really do the movie credit. It was really a relatable movie and it left me with a feeling of expansiveness and freedom. Bonus sfnal linkage: The directors (Anna Boden and Ryan Fleck) went on to direct Captain Marvel

In one of my email newsletters this morning I found this link to a list of words that defined 2021 in Korea. It's interesting to see that they're dealing with a lot of the same problems that we are but their descriptions of them seem slightly different. I was kind of amused to see them adopting "gaslighting" as a useful word. One word that I found particularly evocative was "jeongggeul" (영끌), which literally means "to scrape up your soul" and describes the process that Koreans who are trying to become homeowners have to go through of scraping up every asset they possibly can, even resorting to maxing out their credit cards, in order to put a downpayment on a house. I'm so glad I'm not in that situation right now; A. and I wore fortunate in that we bought our house more or less at the bottom of the trough after the 2008 financial crisis."Jeongggeul" was also interesting because it's the first time I've ever seen a Korean romanization with 3 g's in a row!

Well, I've got to go to a couple more things to do in order to finish out 2021. See you all next year!

ETA: A listing of some of the things that enter the public domain (in America) on 01/01/2022 can be found here.

ETA2: It's nice to see that Brian Eno shares my view on the scammy nature of NFTs.
brithistorian: (Default)
Merry Christmas to those of you who celebrate, and Happy Saturday to those of you who don't. Hope you all had a great day today. It was a good day here - we just hung out around the house, reading and playing games.

A. got me the new Weki Meki album, "I Am Me." I had accidentally discovered that she had ordered it for me, thanks to international postal regulations and their requirement to print contents on the outside of packages, but I did my best to pretend I didn't know and she didn't actually let me have it until today. Continuing the Korean music industry's efforts to package albums in something more interesting than a jewel case, the CD was packaged inside a hardcover photobook of the band. It also came with a poster (that will almost certainly never end up on a wall), a photocard, a 4-photo strip card (approximate size and shape of a bookmark), and a sheet of not-terribly-interesting stickers.(A set of file folder tops with the members names, some colored strips, some colored circles, and some colored blobs. If they had punched the place where it said "I Am Me." on the sticker sheet so that that could have been used as a sticker, that would have been an improvement. I almost feel like the album is worse for including the stickers. I mean, I'm still saving them, because I'm a collector like that, but I really could have done without them.) All complaints about the stickers aside, it's a great album, and A. is awesome for ordering it for me. And not only that, but from when it arrived, she must have ordered it early enough that the sale counted in that crucial first week of album sales.

Also, tonight we watched a new (not just new to us, but new as in actually came out in 2021) Christmas movie: Christmas Again. Not to put too fine a point on it, but it's Groundhog Day, if Groundhog Day took place on Christmas and if Bill Murray was a teenage Latina. The first half hour of it, where Christmas day was going badly for her, was kind of hard to watch, but after that it was pretty good. I don't know if it will find a spot in our regular holiday movie rotation, but it was definitely worth seeing once. Also, for those of you who watch Lucifer, the heroine in Christmas Again is played by Scarlett Estevez, who plays Trixie on Lucifer.

And now I'm off to bed. Stay safe, and I'll see you all tomorrow.

Profile

brithistorian: (Default)
brithistorian

January 2026

S M T W T F S
     1 2 3
45678910
1112 13141516 17
1819 2021 222324
25262728293031

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags