Computational Finance

• Replacements

See recent articles

Showing new listings for Friday, 10 July 2026

Replacement submissions (showing 3 of 3 entries)

[1] arXiv:2404.16777 (replaced) [pdf, html, other]

Title: Subset second-order stochastic dominance for enhanced indexation with diversification enforced by sector constraints

Cristiano Arbex Valle, John E Beasley, Nigel Meade

Subjects: Computational Finance (q-fin.CP)

In this paper we apply second-order stochastic dominance (SSD) to the problem of enhanced indexation with asset subset (sector) constraints. The problem we consider is how to construct a portfolio that is designed to outperform a given market index whilst having regard to the proportion of the portfolio invested in distinct market sectors.
In our approach, subset SSD, the portfolio associated with each sector is treated in a SSD manner. In other words in subset SSD we actively try to find sector portfolios that SSD dominate their respective sector indices. However the proportion of the overall portfolio invested in each sector is not pre-specified, rather it is decided via optimisation. Our subset SSD approach involves the numeric solution of a multivariate second-order stochastic dominance problem.
Computational results are given for our approach as applied to the S&P500 over the period 3rd October 2018 to 29th December 2023. This period, over 5 years, includes the Covid pandemic, which had a significant effect on stock prices. The S&P500 data that we have used is made publicly available for the benefit of future researchers. Our computational results indicate that the scaled version of our subset SSD approach outperforms the S&P500. Our approach also outperforms the standard SSD based approach to the problem. Our results show, that for the S&P500 data considered, including sector constraints improves out-of-sample performance, irrespective of the SSD approach adopted. Results are also given for Fama-French data involving 49 industry portfolios and these confirm the effectiveness of our subset SSD approach.

[2] arXiv:2512.22109 (replaced) [pdf, html, other]

Title: Low-Turnover Rebalancing for Sparse Index Tracking

Dimitrios Roxanas

Comments: Rewritten in the language of generalised Bayesian inference and with the main focus on rebalancing and turnover. New case study and protocol

Subjects: Computational Finance (q-fin.CP); Optimization and Control (math.OC); Portfolio Management (q-fin.PM); Applications (stat.AP); Computation (stat.CO)

Sparse index tracking is often evaluated through rolling reconstruction: a sparse portfolio is fitted on an in-sample window, held over the next period, and rebuilt when the window rolls forward. This can achieve low realised tracking error, but it treats rebalancing primarily as repeated construction and can generate large turnover and frequent substitutions in the selected constituents. We propose a new workflow that separates sparse-tracker construction from sparse-tracker maintenance. A hybrid optimisation-plus-sampling framework provides the metrics operating at the decision level for both layers. The initial tracker is built from a calibrated shrinkage model and uncertainty-aware posterior support screening. Subsequent rebalance dates are handled in the self-financing change variable $\Delta w$. The default action is to preserve the existing tracker; local repairs are implemented only when realised tracking deterioration and posterior directional evidence jointly suggest intervention. In a 2020-2025 S&P 500-style case study, we show that the proposed tracker occupies a distinct low-turnover operating region. Moreover, we demonstrate that the proposed $\Delta w$ maintenance layer can be attached to externally constructed trackers, where it gives consistent improvements over simply holding the initial tracker.
Additional diagnostics, sensitivity experiments, and computational details are reported in the companion Supplementary Material. Replication code and logs of several experiments are available at \href{this https URL}{this https URL}.

[3] arXiv:2607.05091 (replaced) [pdf, html, other]

Title: Any Axes Are Allowed: A Characteristic-Axis Integral Diagnosis of Factor Models

Useong Shin

Subjects: General Finance (q-fin.GN); Computational Finance (q-fin.CP); Pricing of Securities (q-fin.PR); Statistical Finance (q-fin.ST)

This paper extends the cap-axis integral diagnostic to general characteristic axes, measuring factor-model pricing errors as bridge-alpha curves. A predetermined characteristic order generates prefix portfolios; subtracting equal-exposure aggregate portfolios yields zero-investment bridges indexed by cutoff p. The null is a zero-curve restriction on the subspace generated by the order, not a pointwise decile test. In 1967-2024 CRSP data, adding a counterpart factor flips the curve's sign on every axis, but only HML and CMA overcorrect enough to be rejected, whereas RMW and UMD flatten their axes. A size-split reconstruction traces the overcorrection to 2x3 factor construction rather than the premium. Axis pricing errors are largely unrelated to maximum-Sharpe gains.